Aq Res State Trend
ICES has established three different management units for this species:
- Areas VI, VII, and VIII;
- Area IX; and
- Area X (Azores region).
This management unit division is supported by information on genetics and tagging.
Red seabream in VI, VII, and VIII appears to be severely depleted based on historical catches.
Red seabream in Subarea IX is depleted and there is no evidence of a significant recovery as a result of the local recovery plan in Spanish waters of the Strait of Gibraltar.
The status in Subarea X is uncertain but there are signs of increases in indices of abundance from surveys. The cpue in the fishery is stable. It is possible that sequential depletion of local populations may occur and this may contribute to the stability of the commercial cpue series.
Habitat Bio
Depth Zone: Slope (200 m - 1000 m). Vertical Dist: Demersal/Benthic.
Geo Dist
Geo Dist: Straddling between High Seas and EEZ
Exploit
Factors affecting the fisheries and the stock Regulations and their effects The TAC for Areas VI, VII, and VIII is currently 298 t. Landings have been below 300 t since 1991, averaging about 200 t over the last decade.
In Subarea IX, there is an EU TAC of 1080 t. This is more than double the total landings of the Subarea and so does not seem a relevant constraint. A Regional Recovery Plan for P. bogaraveo relating to the Spanish fishery in the Strait of Gibraltar area has been implemented by the Regional Government of Andalucía for 2003–2008. Technical measures adopted in this plan include the closure of the fishing season for two-and-half months (15th January–31st March), a minimum landing size (33 cm total length), authorized vessels list, hook size, maximum hooks per line (100), maximum number of lines per boat (30), maximum number of automatic machines for hauling per boat (3), and restricted ports for landing (only Tarifa and Algeciras).
In Subarea X multispecies and multigear fisheries are operating in an area regarded as vulnerable and which is protected by EU regulations banning bottom trawls and bottom gillnets. Local technical regulations are also in force (minimum landing size, hook size regulation, licensing, size restrictions by zone for gears and vessels, and a quota system by islands and vessel).
A TAC for Area X is currently set at 1136 t. Landings are at the level of the TAC.
Changes in fishing technology and fishing patterns In Subareas VI, VII, and VIII red seabream is mostly a bycatch in longline and trawl fisheries.
There are directed handline and longline fisheries in Subarea IX.
Red seabream have been caught in hook and line fisheries off the Azores since the 16th Century. There are now directed artisanal handline as well as longline fisheries in Area Xa2. Historically, improvements in fishing technology have taken place in the directed handline and longline fisheries. These include the introduction of bottom longlines and bigger fishing vessels. The resulting improvement on fishing efficiency has not been quantified.
Bio Assess
Assess Models
Methodology
Scientific basis Data and methods For Subareas VI, VII, and VIII the only information available is landings (Table 9.4.19.2).
In Subarea IX, landings (Table 9.4.19.3) and lpue are available. An exploratory separable VPA was attempted using available catch-at-age data. The spawning-stock biomass (SSB) and fishing mortality (F) estimates appear consistent with the fishery and survey information.
In Subarea X, landings (Table 9.4.19.4), standardized commercial cpue, and longline survey data were used (Figure 9.4.19.3). Figure 9.4.19.4 shows total landings for Area Xa
2 (Azores).
Results
 |
Figure 9.4.19.1. Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo). Long-term trends in landings in the North Atlantic.  |
 |
Figure 9.4.19.2. Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo). Landings by management unit.  |
 |
Figure 9.4.19.3. Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo). Annual standardized cpue in number per thousand hooks and 95% confidence intervals for the Azores bottom longline blackspot seabream (ICES Area Xa2).  |
 |
Figure 9.4.19.4. Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) historical landings from the Azores (ICES Area Xa2).  |
Table 9.4.19.1. Red seabream (working group estimates) landings by management unit (tonnes).
| VI,VII,VIII | IX | X |
1988 | 389 | 689 | 637 |
1989 | 461 | 676 | 924 |
1990 | 446 | 594 | 889 |
1991 | 257 | 532 | 874 |
1992 | 164 | 797 | 1090 |
1993 | 197 | 1000 | 830 |
1994 | 141 | 1004 | 989 |
1995 | 121 | 829 | 1115 |
1996 | 52 | 978 | 1052 |
1997 | 81 | 1011 | 1012 |
1998 | 121 | 877 | 1119 |
1999 | 150 | 543 | 1222 |
2000 | 237 | 421 | 924 |
2001 | 237 | 374 | 1034 |
2002 | 181 | 359 | 1193 |
2003 | 148 | 471 | 1068 |
2004 | 252 | 480 | 1075 |
2005 | 220 | 494 | 1113 |
2006 | 195 | 544 | 958 |
2007 | 298 | 586 | 1070 |
Table 9.4.19.2. Red seabream (working group estimates) landings in VI, VII, and VIII (tonnes). RED (=BLACKSPOT) SEABREAM (Pagellus bogaraveo) VI and VII
Year | France* | Ireland | Spain | E & W | Ch. Islands | TOTAL |
1988 | 52 | 0 | 47 | 153 | 0 | 252 |
1989 | 44 | 0 | 69 | 76 | 0 | 189 |
1990 | 22 | 3 | 73 | 36 | 0 | 134 |
1991 | 13 | 10 | 30 | 56 | 14 | 123 |
1992 | 6 | 16 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
1993 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
1994 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
1995 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
1996 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 29 |
1997 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 36 | | 56 |
1998 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 6 | | 17 |
1999 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 15 | | 27 |
2000 | 8 | n.a. | 3 | 13 | | 24 |
2001 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 37 | | 53 |
2002 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 13 | | 30 |
2003 | 26 | 0 | 7 | 20 | | 53 |
2004 | 64 | | 4 | 18 | | 86 |
2005 | 59 | | 4 | 7 | | 70 |
2006 | 72 | 0 | 8 | 19 | | 98 |
2007 | 73 | 0 | 8 | 57 | | 138 |
RED (=BLACKSPOT) SEABREAM (Pagellus bogaraveo) VIII Year | France* | Spain | England (1) | TOTAL |
1988 | 37 | 91 | 9 | 137 |
1989 | 31 | 234 | 7 | 272 |
1990 | 15 | 280 | 17 | 312 |
1991 | 10 | 124 | 0 | 134 |
1992 | 5 | 119 | 0 | 124 |
1993 | 3 | 172 | 0 | 175 |
1994 | 0 | 131 | 0 | 131 |
1995 | 0 | 110 | 0 | 110 |
1996 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
1997 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 25 |
1998 | 18 | 86 | 0 | 104 |
1999 | 40 | 84 | 0 | 124 |
2000 | 24 | 189 | 0 | 213 |
2001 | 16 | 168 | 0 | 184 |
2002 | 41 | 111 | 0 | 152 |
2003 | 12 | 83 | 0 | 95 |
2004 | 75 | 82 | 8 | 166 |
2005 | 60 | 90 | 0 | 150 |
2006 | 40 | 57 | 0 | 97 |
2007 | 66 | 94 | 0 | 160 |
(1) in 2005 England & Wales.* updated since 1999. |
RED (=BLACKSPOT) SEABREAM (Pagellus bogaraveo) in VI, VII, VIII, XII ICES Subareas and CECAF Year | VI+VII* | VIII* | TOTAL |
1988 | 252 | 137 | 389 |
1989 | 189 | 272 | 461 |
1990 | 134 | 312 | 446 |
1991 | 123 | 134 | 257 |
1992 | 40 | 124 | 164 |
1993 | 22 | 175 | 197 |
1994 | 10 | 131 | 141 |
1995 | 11 | 110 | 121 |
1996 | 29 | 23 | 52 |
1997 | 56 | 25 | 81 |
1998 | 17 | 104 | 121 |
1999 | 27 | 124 | 150 |
2000 | 24 | 213 | 237 |
2001 | 53 | 184 | 237 |
2002 | 30 | 152 | 181 |
2003 | 53 | 95 | 148 |
2004 | 86 | 166 | 252 |
2005 | 70 | 150 | 220 |
2006 | 98 | 97 | 195 |
2007 | 138 | 160 | 298 |
* updated since 1999. |
Table 9.4.19.3. Red seabream (working group estimates) landings in Area IX (tonnes). RED (=BLACKSPOT) SEABREAM (Pagellus bogaraveo) IX
Year | Portugal | Spain | TOTAL |
1988 | 370 | 319 | 689 |
1989 | 260 | 416 | 676 |
1990 | 166 | 428 | 594 |
1991 | 109 | 423 | 532 |
1992 | 166 | 631 | 797 |
1993 | 235 | 765 | 1000 |
1994 | 150 | 854 | 1004 |
1995 | 204 | 625 | 829 |
1996 | 209 | 769 | 978 |
1997 | 203 | 808 | 1011 |
1998 | 357 | 520 | 877 |
1999 | 265 | 278 | 543 |
2000 | 83 | 338 | 421 |
2001 | 97 | 277 | 374 |
2002 | 111 | 248 | 359 |
2003 | 142 | 329 | 471 |
2004 | 183 | 297 | 480 |
2005 | 129 | 365 | 494 |
2006 | 104 | 440 | 544 |
2007 | 185 | 401 | 586 |
* Preliminary. |
Table 9.4.19.4. Red seabream (Working Group estimates) landings in Area X (tonnes). RED (=BLACKSPOT) SEABREAM (Pagellus bogaraveo) X
Year | Azores (Xa2) | Total |
1988 | 637 | 637 |
1989 | 924 | 924 |
1990 | 889 | 889 |
1991 | 874 | 874 |
1992 | 1090 | 1090 |
1993 | 830 | 830 |
1994 | 989 | 989 |
1995 | 1115 | 1115 |
1996 | 1052 | 1052 |
1997 | 1012 | 1012 |
1998 | 1119 | 1119 |
1999 | 1222 | 1222 |
2000 | 924 | 924 |
2001 | 1034 | 1034 |
2002 | 1193 | 1193 |
2003 | 1068 | 1068 |
2004 | 1075 | 1075 |
2005 | 1113 | 1113 |
2006 | 958 | 958 |
2007 | 1070 | 1070 |
Ref Point
No reference points have been defined for red seabream.
Sci Advice
Single-stock exploitation boundaries Catches in Subareas VI, VII, and VIII have been very low for the last 20 years and ICES recommends that the fishery should not be allowed to expand unless it can be shown that it is sustainable.
ICES recommends that catches in Areas IXa and Xa should be constrained to recent average catches (2003–2007) of 500 t in Area IXa and 1050 t in Area Xa and to collect information that can be used to evaluate a long-term sustainable level of exploitation.
Management
Management unit: Yes
Objectives
A local recovery plan is in force in the Strait of Gibraltar (IXa). There are no management objectives for red seabream in any of the other management units.
Advice
Management considerations Red seabream have a low productivity and they change sex as they age, starting as males and becoming females between ages 4 and 6. Hermaphroditic species are particularly susceptible to overexploitation. Measures to ensure balanced exploitation between younger fish (males) and older fish (females) are essential. Minimum landing sizes in all areas should be set to 35 cm to conserve the proportion of males in the populations. If a minimum landing size for this species is to be effective in reducing mortality on males, this would imply that either the gear or the spatial distribution of the fishery needs to be adapted so that small (male) fish are not caught. If these adaptations cannot be made to avoid the capture of small fish, then the effect of a minimum landing size would depend on the survivorship of discarded fish. This survivorship of red seabream discards is unknown.
In Subarea X, more detailed information of the spatial and temporal distribution of catches is required so that areas which may show evidence of sequential depletion can be better protected.
Sources
ICES. 2009. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2009. ICES Advice, 2009.