Sandeel - North Sea|
Marine Resource Fact Sheet |
| | | Data Ownership | This document provided, maintained and owned by International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) , is part of ICES Advice data collection. |
| Related observations | Locate in inventory | | Species: | FAO Names: en - Sandeels(=Sandlances) nei, fr - Lançons nca, es - Lanzones nep, ru - Песчанковые |
|
|
| Geographic extent of Sandeel - North Sea
Map tips
- Click on
to turn layers on and off
- Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
FAO Fishing Statistical Division Areas |
---|
27.4.a | Northern North Sea (Division 27.4.a) |
---|
27.4.b | Central North Sea (Division 27.4.b) |
---|
27.4.c | Southern North Sea (Division 27.4.c) |
---|
|
|
|
|
| Main Descriptors | Considered a single stock: Yes
Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional Management unit: Yes
Reference year: 2008
|
Considered a single stock: A group of individuals in a species occupying a well defined spatial range independent of other stocks of the same species. It can be affected by random dispersal movements and directed migrations due to seasonal or reproductive activity. |
Spatial Scale: Spatial scale contains a standard term such as Global, Regional (e.g. for the whole Atlantic), sub-regional (e.g. for a part of the Atlantic), national, local (for sub-national levels). |
Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
Reference Year: The Reference Year is the last year considered in the stock assessment and/or fishery status. |
| | | | Biological State and Trend
Spawning biomass in relation to precautionary limits |
Fishing mortality in relation to precautionary limits |
Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield |
Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target |
Comment |
Increased risk |
Undefined |
Undefined |
Undefined |
|
According to the most recent estimate of SSB (2009), ICES classifies the stock as being at risk of reduced reproductive capacity. Fishing mortality decreased between 2001 and 2007 and increased in 2008 and 2009, but the present absolute level is uncertain. In the absence of an F reference point, the state of the stock cannot be evaluated with regard to sustainable harvest Habitat and Biology Depth zone: Shelf (50 m - 200 m). Vertical distribution: Demersal/Benthic. Geographical Distribution Jurisdictional distribution: Shared between nations Water Area Overview Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional Geo References  | Geographic extent of Sandeel - North Sea
FAO Fishing Statistical Division Areas | 27.4.a: Northern North Sea (Division 27.4.a) | 27.4.b: Central North Sea (Division 27.4.b) | 27.4.c: Southern North Sea (Division 27.4.c) |
| | | | Intersecting Major FAO areas and LME areas |
The following area codes have been found as intersecting the distribution of Sandeel - North Sea FAO Major Fishing Areas | 27:
Atlantic, Northeast | Large Marine Ecosystem Areas (LME) | 22: North Sea | 24: Celtic-Biscay Shelf |
Resource Structure Considered a single stock: Yes Exploitation Factors affecting the fisheries and the stockRegulations and their effectsRegulation of the catch by the sandeel fishery has since 2004 been based on the abundance of 1-group sandeels, estimated from an exploratory fishing in the beginning of the fishing season.The number of Danish vessels has declined from 200 vessels in 2004 to 84 in 2009, and a 43% reduction in total kilowatt days for the same period. In 2007, the Danish industrial vessels were given individual tradable quotas (ITQ) on sandeel and this caused a change towards fewer and larger vessels. The Norwegian fleet fishing for sandeel declined from 90 to 33 vessels between 2002 and 2009. In May 2009, ICES suggested a TAC of 400 000 tonnes on the basis of the real-time monitoring in April. The resulting TAC was not fully taken, recorded landings totalled 350 000 t. Impacts of the environment on the fish stockThere are indications that the egg production in prey copepod species Calanus finmarchicus supports the survival of sandeel larvae, and that climate-generated shifts in the Calanus species composition lead to a mismatch in timing between food availability and the early life history of lesser sandeels (van Deurs et al., 2009). Changes in fishing technology and fishing patternsSandeel is taken by trawlers using small-mesh gear. The fishery is seasonal, taking place mostly in the spring and summer. There used to be a targeted 0-group fishery in autumn (3rd quarter), but this ceased in 2004. Most of the catch consists of Ammodytes marinus, but other sandeel species are caught as well. There is a low percentage bycatch of other fish species, including species for which a TAC has been set (ICES, 2003). Sandeel are largely stationary after settlement and there is a complex of local (sub-)stocks in the North Sea. Recruitment to individual fishing banks may not only be related to the local (sub-)stock, as some interchange between (sub-)stocks may take place during the early phases of life before settlement. The Shetland sandeel stock is assessed as a separate unit. Concurrent with the increase in the total stock size, some areas especially in the northern North Sea with recent very low abundance have been repopulated in 2006 and 2008. Evidence however suggests that abundance following fisheries in 2008 in these areas is now again at a low level, and no sandeel fishery was allowed in the Norwegian EEZ in 2009 Assessment Assessment Model Methodology Scientific basisData and methodsThe assessment of sandeel is carried out without fisheries-independent indices of abundance. At present no scientific surveys time-series are available that can be used for the assessment. The assessment method used is Seasonal XSA (SXSA), which allows the use of semi-annual data. As in previous assessments, effort data from the commercial fishery in the northern and southern North Sea are treated as two independent tuning fleets, separated into half-years. Uncertainties in assessment and forecastThe major elements of recent recruitment and stock development are being captured in the assessment, but details in recent years are uncertain due to: - the assumption that there is a single North Sea stock;
- lack of fisheries-independent tuning data;
- large changes in fishing pattern in recent years; and
- possible large changes in catch efficiency in recent years.
The assessment used to provide the stock status assumes equal weight for fleets fishing in the north and south of the North Sea. However in recent years, a decreasing proportion of the effort has been located within the north due to closures in the Norwegian EEZ. The assessment estimates are sensitive to the distribution of effort and exploratory assessments have highlighted that the most recent dynamics of SSB and F are sensitive to these assumptions. The resulting range of biomass estimates in 2009 spans B lim to above B pa. The advice is based on the assessment procedure as used in previous years. A further evaluation of the assessment approach is needed to remedy these uncertainties. Recruitment time-series estimates from surveys are not yet available, but the time-series are being developed. A first review of some of these data by ICES concludes that the surveys have the potential to provide indices of recruitment on both local and subarea scale. Recruitment estimates are presently based exclusively on commercial catch-at-age data. Comparison with previous assessment and adviceThe historical comparison of the advice shows a tendency to overestimate SSB and underestimate F. The advice is similar to last year’s advice. Overall Assessment Results  | Figure 6.4.22.1 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Stock summary.  |  | Figuer 6.4.22.2 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Stock–recruitment plot and precautionary approach plot.  |  | Figure 6.4.22.3 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Comparison of historical performance of assessments.  |  | Figure 6.4.22.3 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Data sampling areas.  |  | Table 6.4.22.2 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Official landings (tonnes) by country and Subdivisions reported to ICES.  |  | Table 6.4.22.3 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Landings (‘000 t) per country as provided by Working Group members.  |  | Table 6.4.22.4 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Monthly landings (tonnes) by Denmark, Norway, and Scotland only, from the areas defined in Figure 6.4.22.4. Data provided by Working Group members.  | Table 6.4.22.5 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Assessment summary.
Year
|
Recruitment
Age 0
Millions
|
SSB
tonnes
|
Landings*
tonnes
|
Mean F
Ages 1-2
|
1983 |
878848 |
1236745 |
530641 |
0.471 |
1984 |
225599 |
754271 |
750040 |
0.340 |
1985 |
1199288 |
1169916 |
707105 |
0.925 |
1986 |
622401 |
489853 |
685949 |
0.566 |
1987 |
198475 |
1638389 |
791050 |
0.440 |
1988 |
716146 |
1495275 |
1007303 |
0.799 |
1989 |
324068 |
493162 |
826836 |
0.704 |
1990 |
632191 |
648117 |
584912 |
0.820 |
1991 |
799404 |
455214 |
898959 |
0.773 |
1992 |
316352 |
671540 |
820140 |
0.514 |
1993 |
618012 |
1076253 |
576932 |
0.377 |
1994 |
865131 |
789593 |
770746 |
0.560 |
1995 |
355327 |
1027068 |
915042 |
0.439 |
1996 |
1893077 |
1075400 |
776126 |
0.483 |
1997 |
321517 |
649068 |
1114044 |
0.377 |
1998 |
382990 |
1675811 |
1000376 |
0.630 |
1999 |
488704 |
843271 |
718667 |
0.617 |
2000 |
484686 |
463992 |
692499 |
0.950 |
2001 |
851253 |
314486 |
858619 |
1.016 |
2002 |
74343 |
327895 |
806921 |
0.785 |
2003 |
274977 |
402129 |
309724 |
0.710 |
2004 |
145349 |
173288 |
359362 |
0.790 |
2005 |
289127 |
152014 |
171790 |
0.732 |
2006 |
191141 |
155050 |
286751 |
0.563 |
2007 |
299138 |
313998 |
203392 |
0.426 |
2008 |
310412 |
389009 |
322738 |
0.547 |
2009 |
|
455164 |
336897 |
0.687 |
2010 |
|
456000** |
|
|
* landings do not include 0-group in the first half-year
** preliminary results at the end of the fishing season
|
Reference Point
|
Type |
Value |
Technical basis |
Precautionary approach |
Blim |
430 000 t |
The lowest observed biomass in the period 1976–1998. |
|
Bpa |
600 000 t |
Bpa =1.4 * Blim. |
|
Flim |
Not defined. |
|
|
Fpa |
Not defined. |
|
Targets |
Fy |
Not defined. |
|
(unchanged since 1999) |
Scientific Advice Single-stock exploitation boundariesConsidering the options below, ICES advises on the basis of exploitation boundaries in relation to precautionary limits that fishing grounds that are known to be commercially depleted should be closed to fishing while at non-depleted fishing grounds fishing should only be allowed in 2010 if analysis of real-time monitoring indicates that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2011Exploitation boundaries in relation to high long-term yield, low risk of depletion of production potential and considering ecosystem effectsThe management of sandeel fisheries should implement measures to prevent depletion of local aggregations, particularly in areas where predators congregate. Exploitation boundaries in relation to precautionary limitsICES recommends that fishing grounds that are known to be commercially depleted should be closed to fishing until there is evidence from monitoring programmes that local populations have recovered. On other fishing grounds, a fishery should only be allowed in 2010 if analysis of real-time monitoring indicates that the stock can be rebuilt to B pa by 2011. Table 6.4.22.1 Sandeel in Subarea IV. Single stock exploitation boundaries (advice), management and catch.
Year |
Single-stock exploitation boundaries / from 2004 onwards ICES
Advice
|
Catch corresponding to exploitation boundaries / advice |
TAC 3 |
ICES
Catch
|
1987 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
825 |
1988 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
893 |
1989 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
1039 |
1990 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
591 |
1991 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
843 |
1992 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
855 |
1993 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
579 |
1994 |
No advice1; No advice2 |
|
|
786 |
1995 |
Can sustain current F1; No advice2 |
|
|
918 |
1996 |
Can sustain current F |
|
|
777 |
1997 |
Can sustain current F |
|
|
1138 |
1998 |
Can sustain current F |
|
1000 |
1004 |
1999 |
Can sustain current F |
|
1000 |
735 |
2000 |
Can sustain current F |
|
1020 |
699 |
2001 |
Can sustain current F |
|
1020 |
862 |
2002 |
Can sustain current F |
|
1020 |
811 |
2003 |
No increase in F |
|
918 |
326 |
2004 |
Exploitation to be kept below level of 2003. Adjustment to be made conditional on the abundance of the 2003 year class |
- |
826 |
362 |
2005 |
Exploitation to be kept below level of 2003. Adjustment to be made conditional on the abundance of the 2004 year class |
- |
661 |
172 |
2006 |
The fishery should remain closed until information is available which assures that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2007. |
- |
300 |
288 |
2007 |
The fishery should remain closed until information is available which assures that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2008. |
- |
1734 |
206 |
2008 |
The fishery should only be allowed if monitoring information is available and shows that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2009.
|
- |
4005 |
335 |
2009 |
The fishery should only be allowed if monitoring information is available and shows that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2010 |
- |
400 |
|
2010 |
The fishery should only be allowed if monitoring information is available and shows that the stock can be rebuilt to Bpa by 2011 |
- |
|
|
Weights in ‘000 t.
1 Southern stock component.
2 Northern stock component.
3 Set for zone IIIa, EC waters of Division IIa and Subarea IV.
4 EU and Norway, set at 30 June 2007.
5 EU and Norway, set at 23 July 2008.
|
Management Management unit: Yes Management Objectives There are no explicit management objectives for this stock. Management Advice Management considerationsThe high natural mortality of sandeel and the few year classes in the fishery make the stock size and catch opportunities largely dependent on the size of the incoming year classes. If a real-time management using an escapement strategy is applied in 2010, the escapement target should be defined so that the SSB reaches at least B pa in 2011. Fishing grounds that are known to be commercially depleted should be closed to fishing until there is evidence that local populations have recovered. ICES recommends that future management should take account of the spatial structure of sandeels. Sandeel management in the North Sea is based on the assumption that there is a single stock when there is strong evidence of a number of spatially distinct (sub-)stocks. The full stock structure of sandeel in the North Sea, however, remains unclear. It is known that (sub-)stocks on the Viking/Bergen Banks, in the western North Sea off Scotland, and the (separately-managed) Shetland stock are all distinct. The present knowledge on defining (sub-)stocks off south-western Norway and in the southern North Sea is too limited to recommend specific management measures for 2010 which can take the full stock structure into account. Impacts of fisheries on the ecosystemsLocal depletion of sandeel aggregations at a distance less than 100 km from seabird colonies may affect some species of birds, especially black-legged kittiwake ( Rissa tridactyla) and sandwich tern ( Sterna sandvicensis), whereas the more mobile marine mammals and fish may be less vulnerable to local sandeel depletion. In the light of studies linking low sandeel availability to poor breeding success of kittiwake, all commercial fishing in the Firth of Forth area has been prohibited since 2000, except for a short-term fishery in May and June of each year for stock monitoring purposes. A major function of sandeels in the North Sea ecosystem is the provision of food to predators, including fish, marine mammals, and seabirds. The management objectives should ensure that the stock remains high enough to provide food for predator species and prevent depletion of local aggregations, particularly in areas of predator concentration. The sandeel fishery in the area off the Scottish coast that was closed to sandeel fishery in 2000, should continue to be closed in 2010 in view of the current low productivity of the sandeel (sub-)stock in this area and to provide, as far as possible, a food supply to dependent predators. In other areas of the North Sea, avoidance of depletion at a local scale will help take account of the function of sandeels in the ecosystem. Source of information ICES.2009.Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2009. ICES Advice, 2009. |
|
| |
|
|