|
Marine Resource Fact Sheet |
| |
Indo-Pacific sailfish - Indian Ocean |
Indo-Pacific Sailfish Indian Ocean |
| Data Ownership | This document provided, maintained and owned by Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) , is part of IOTC Stock Status Reports data collection. |
|
Related observations | Locate in inventory | | Species: | FAO Names: en - Indo-Pacific sailfish, fr - Voilier indo-pacifique, es - Pez vela del Indo-Pacífico, ru - Парусник индо-тихоокеанский |
Fishery IndicatorsProduction: Catch |
|
| Geographic extent of Indo-Pacific sailfish - Indian Ocean
Map tips
- Click on
to turn layers on and off
- Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
FAO Major Fishing Areas |
---|
51 | Indian Ocean, Western |
---|
57 | Indian Ocean, Eastern |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Descriptors | Considered a single stock: Yes
Management unit: Yes Reference year: 2017 |
Considered a single stock: A group of individuals in a species occupying a well defined spatial range independent of other stocks of the same species. It can be affected by random dispersal movements and directed migrations due to seasonal or reproductive activity. |
Spatial Scale: Spatial scale contains a standard term such as Global, Regional (e.g. for the whole Atlantic), sub-regional (e.g. for a part of the Atlantic), national, local (for sub-national levels). |
Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
Reference Year: The Reference Year is the last year considered in the stock assessment and/or fishery status. |
| | | | Biological State and Trend Habitat and Biology Climatic zone: Temperate; Tropical. Horizontal distribution: Oceanic. Vertical distribution: Pelagic. Geographical Distribution Jurisdictional distribution: Highly migratory Geo References  | Geographic extent of Indo-Pacific sailfish - Indian Ocean
FAO Major Fishing Areas | 51: Indian Ocean, Western | 57: Indian Ocean, Eastern |
| | | | Intersecting Major FAO areas and LME areas |
The following area codes have been found as intersecting the distribution of Indo-Pacific sailfish - Indian Ocean FAO Major Fishing Areas | 51:
Indian Ocean, Western | 57:
Indian Ocean, Eastern | Large Marine Ecosystem Areas (LME) | 30: Agulhas Current | 31: Somali Coastal Current | 32: Arabian Sea | 33: Red Sea | 34: Bay of Bengal | 38: Indonesian Sea | 39: North Australian Shelf | 42: Southeast Australian Shelf | 43: Southwest Australian Shelf | 44: West-Central Australian Shelf | 45: Northwest Australian Shelf |
Resource Structure Considered a single stock: Yes The stock structure of Indo-Pacific sailfish in the Indian Ocean is uncertain: apparently there are local reproductively isolated stocks. At least one stock was reported in the Persian Gulf with no or very little intermixing with open Indian Ocean stocks. However outside of the Gulf no stock differentiation has been determined; thus for the purposes of assessment, one pan-ocean stock is assumed. However, spatial heterogeneity in stock indicators (catch– per–unit–effort trends) for other billfish species indicates that there is potential for localised depletion. Exploitation Fishery Indicators Type | Measure | Value | Unit | Time period |
---|
Production | Catch | 633 | tonnes | Average 1950 - 1959 | Catch | 1197 | tonnes | Average 1960 - 1969 | Catch | 1348 | tonnes | Average 1970 - 1979 | Catch | 3826 | tonnes | Average 1980 - 1989 | Catch | 11195 | tonnes | Average 1990 - 1999 | Catch | 17940 | tonnes | Average 2000 - 2009 | Catch | 27834 | tonnes | Average 2010 - 2019 | Catch | 23171 | tonnes | 2011 | Catch | 23697 | tonnes | 2012 | Catch | 27137 | tonnes | 2013 | Catch | 27160 | tonnes | 2014 | Catch | 28339 | tonnes | 2015 | Catch | 26919 | tonnes | 2016 | Catch | 32213 | tonnes | 2017 | Catch | 33825 | tonnes | 2018 | Catch | 29635 | tonnes | 2019 | Catch | 26887 | tonnes | 2020 |
Assessment Level of uncertainty: High No new stock assessment for Indo-Pacific sailfish was carried out in 2021, thus, the stock status is determined on the basis of the 2019 assessment using the C-MSY model. The data poor stock assessment techniques indicated that F was above FMSY (F/FMSY=1.22) and B is above BMSY (B/BMSY=1.14). Another alternative model using the Stock Reduction Analysis (SRA) techniques produced similar results. The stock appears to show a continued increase in catches which is a cause of concern (Fig. 1), indicating that fishing mortality levels may be becoming too high (Fig. 2). However, both assessment models rely on catch data only, and the catch series is highly uncertain. In addition, aspects of the biology, productivity and fisheries for this species, combined with the data poor status on which to base a more formal assessment, are also a cause for concern. On the weight-of-evidence available in 2019, the stock status cannot be assessed and is determined to be uncertain. Assessment Model Type: Biomass-aggregated Scientific Advice The catch limits as stipulated in Resolution 18/05 have been exceeded. The Commission should provide mechanisms to ensure that catch limits are not exceeded by all concerned fisheries. Research emphasis on further developing possible CPUE indicators from gillnet fisheries, and further exploration of stock assessment approaches for data poor fisheries are warranted. Given the limited data being reported for coastal gillnet fisheries, and the importance of sports fisheries for this species, efforts must be made to rectify these information gaps. The lack of catch records in the Persian Gulf should also be examined to evaluate the degree of localised depletion in Indian Ocean coastal areas. Management Management unit: Yes Source of information IOTC–SC23 2020. Report of the 23rd Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee. Seychelles, 7 – 11 December 2020. IOTC–2020–SC23–R[E]: 211pp. https://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2021/06/IOTC-2020-SC23-RE_Rev1.pdf Bibliography All references to figures, tables and bibliography in the text are found within the source of information. |
|
| |
|