Cunene horse mackerel - Gabon, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Angola|
Fact Sheet Title Fact Sheet |
| | Cunene horse mackerel - Gabon, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Angola |
Chinchard du Cunène (Trachurus trecae) - stock sud (Gabon, Congo, République démocratique du Congo et Angola) |
| Data Ownership | This document provided, maintained and owned by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) , is part of CECAF Stock Status Reports data collection. |
| ident Block | ident Block | | Species List: | Species Ref: en - Cunene horse mackerel, fr - Chinchard du Cunène, es - Jurel de Cunene, ru - Ставрида западноафриканская |
Fishery IndicatorsProduction: Catch |
|
| ident Block Cunene horse mackerel - Gabon, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Angola
Map tips
- Click on to turn layers on and off
- Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
fao Div |
---|
34.3.5 | Central Gulf of Guinea |
---|
34.3.6 | Southern Gulf of Guinea |
---|
47.1.1 | Cape Palmeirinhas |
---|
47.1.2 | Cape Salinas |
---|
47.1.3 | Cunene |
---|
|
|
|
|
| Aq Res | Biological Stock: Yes
Value: Regional Management unit: No
Reference year: 2017
|
Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
Reference Year: The Reference Year is the last year considered in the stock assessment and/or fishery status. |
| | | | Aq Res State Trend Fcur/F0.1: Ratio between the observed fishing mortality coefficient during the last year of the series and F0.1. Fcur/FMSY: Ratio between the observed fishing mortality coefficient during the last year of the series and the coefficient that would give a maximum sustainable yield over the long term. Bcur/B0.1: Ratio between the estimated biomass for the last year and the biomass corresponding to F0.1. Bcur/BMSY: Ratio between the estimated biomass for the last year and the biomass corresponding to FMSY. Unless otherwise indicated, the indicators were based on the Schaefer dynamic production stock assessment model. Habitat Bio Climatic Zone: Tropical. Depth Zone: Coastal (0 m - 50 m); Shelf - Uppershelf (up to 100 m). Horizontal Dist: Neritic. Vertical Dist: Pelagic. Geo Dist Geo Dist: Shared between nations Water Area Overview | Water Area Overview Cunene horse mackerel - Gabon, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Angola
fao Div | 34.3.5: Central Gulf of Guinea | 34.3.6: Southern Gulf of Guinea | 47.1.1: Cape Palmeirinhas | 47.1.2: Cape Salinas | 47.1.3: Cunene |
| | | | Water Area Overview
Exclusive Economic Zone Areas (EEZ) | GAB: Gabon | COG: Congo, Republic of | COD: Congo, Dem. Rep. of the | AGO: Angola |
| | | | Water Area Overview |
Water Area OverviewCunene horse mackerel - Gabon, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Angola Aq Res Struct Biological Stock: Yes The Working Group decided to consider five stocks: the northern stock (Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone) made up of Decapterus spp., Caranx spp., Trachurus trecae and other Carangidae; the western stock (Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Togo) made up of the same species; the central stock (Cameroon and Nigeria), consisting of other Carangidae; the São Tomé stock consisted of Decapterus spp., and Caranx spp. and the southern stock (Angola, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Gabon) consisting of Trachurus trecae, Caranx spp., other Carangidae and Decapterus spp. for the Democratic Republic of the Congo). Exploit TOTAL CATCH: For the group of Trachurus spp. species, most of the reported catches of Trachurus trecae corresponds to countries from the southern region, with an average of about 35 000 tonnes, mostly from the Angolan coast. Catches corresponding to the southern stock decreased from 61 000 tonnes in 1990 to 3 000 tonnes and 3 300 tonnes in 2004 and 2010, respectively, but about 70 000 tonnes in 2013 and more than 90 000 tonnes in 2015. In the northern and western regions (with averaged annual catches of 14 500 tonnes and 6 500 tonnes, respectively), the catches present noticeably annual oscillations. In the northern stock, high values of more than 30 000 tonnes in the were reported for 2016 and 2017, produced by the industrial fisheries off Guinea Bissau. In the case of the western stock, a record value on 23 000 tonnes occurred in 2014 (by the Ghanaian artisanal fishery) and, conversely, a very low value of about 5 000 tonnes was reported for 2017. EFFORT: In Guinea and Sierra Leone these species are mainly fished by encircling gillnets and driftnets in the artisanal fishery. In Benin, Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria and Togo, small carangids are mainly fished by beach seine and purse seine. Most of the industrial fleets’ effort is concentrated in the Guinean EEZ. The large pelagic trawlers that target horse mackerel come from eastern European countries (the Russian Federation and Ukraine). The nominal effort of this fleet (fishing days) decreased overall from more than 600 fishing days in 1996 to about 400 days in 2004, then recovered and increased to 900 days in 2005 before falling again to 600 days in 2007; there was an increase to 5 600 days in 2017 (Table 5.2.2). Some of the countries have reported problems in their fishery data and information collection system, and only six of them have updated the effort time series. São Tomé has not reported new data and the available data needs to be revised because of the establishment of the new database. CPUE: The CPUE, in tonnes per fishing day or positive trip, is calculated for each species or group of species in each stock where data are available (Figure 5.2.2a, figure 5.2.2b, figure 5.2.2c, figure 5.2.2d, table 5.2.2b, table 5.2.2c, table 5.2.2d, and table 5.2.2e). Some of the time series of fishing effort do not have the same units of measurements over the years or between fisheries. Therefore, global CPUEs cannot be considered by stock. For Decapterus rhonchus and Trachurus trecae, the CPUE series is based on the nominal effort of the industrial demersal fleet in Guinea (northern stock). In Angola, Trachurus trecae and T. capensis can be found; thus, in processing the data for Angola together with the other countries, Trachurus spp. was used instead of T. trecae. *Angola catches for T. trecae and T. capensis. Angola Purse seine small pelagic fishery - Angolan watersAngola Artisanal fisheries - Angolan watersAngola Beach seine small pelagic fishery - Angolan watersAngola Seine net small pelagic fishery - Angolan waters Fishery Indicators Type | Measure | Value | Unit | Time period |
---|
Production | Catch | 64928 | tonnes | 1990 | Catch | 34573 | tonnes | 1991 | Catch | 31475 | tonnes | 1992 | Catch | 43970 | tonnes | 1993 | Catch | 29459 | tonnes | 1994 | Catch | 21839 | tonnes | 1995 | Catch | 48042 | tonnes | 1996 | Catch | 54135 | tonnes | 1997 | Catch | 43480 | tonnes | 1998 | Catch | 26284 | tonnes | 1999 | Catch | 40246 | tonnes | 2000 | Catch | 46347 | tonnes | 2001 | Catch | 38731 | tonnes | 2002 | Catch | 34419 | tonnes | 2003 | Catch | 3013 | tonnes | 2004 | Catch | 5707 | tonnes | 2005 | Catch | 15822 | tonnes | 2006 | Catch | 15056 | tonnes | 2007 | Catch | 44453 | tonnes | 2008 | Catch | 16492 | tonnes | 2009 | Catch | 3354 | tonnes | 2010 | Catch | 6400 | tonnes | 2011 | Catch | 40050 | tonnes | 2012 | Catch | 69569 | tonnes | 2013 | Catch | 48531 | tonnes | 2014 | Catch | 90276 | tonnes | 2015 | Catch | 48006 | tonnes | 2016 | Catch | 48000 | tonnes | 2017 |
Bio Assess Assessment year: 2018 The CECAF Working Groups have adopted the following Biological Reference Points (BRPs): - Limit Reference points: BMSY and FMSY - Target Reference Points: B0.1 and F0.1 Stock status is assigned based on current estimates of fishing mortality (Fcur) and biomass (Bcur) relative to these target and limit reference points (Bcur/BMSY, Fcur/FMSY, Bcur/B0.1, Fcur/F0.1). The results from the stock assessment of this stock are found under the “Biological state and trend section”. Data The input data were the total catch data on Trachurus trecae for the period 2007–2017 for three countries in the southern subregion. The following data were used to estimate the total catch: the artisanal fisheries in Gabon (2007–17), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (2007–2012), as well as artisanal (2007, 2008, 2012, and 2017), purse seiners with the exception of 2016 (2007-2017), pelagic trawlers (2015 and 2017) and demersal trawlers (1998–2016) with an exception of 2012 for Angola. The CPUE used was the acoustic surveys’ abundance index estimated by R/V Dr Fridtjof Nansen (2007–2017) in Angola (Winter surveys). The initial parameters were: Trachurus trecae southern stock: r = 0.45/year, K = 400 000 tonnes and BI/K = 60 percent. Assess Models Type: Biomass-aggregated Schaefer dynamic production model The Schaefer dynamic production model on an Excel spreadsheet was used (model described in FAO, 2013). The model requires a time series of total catch and abundance indices of the stock. The estimates of total catch obtained by summing catches from different fleets from different countries were used by region/stock. Results RESULTS: The model provides an acceptable fit to the data available. The results of the assessment indicate that the current biomass level Bcur of the stock is 78 percent of the biomass at B0.1, and the ratio between current fishing mortality and F0.1 is 135 percent. DISCUSSION: The model shows that the stock is overexploited. However, the total catches of this species are not available, as data for Congo was unavailable as well as some years for some Angolan fisheries fleets. Survey data show a general decreasing trend over the time series until 2011, followed by an increase in biomass for 2012 and 2013, and a decreasing trend for the reminder years with the exception of 2015. Currently, the fishing mortality is higher than what would produce a sustainable yield at the current biomass level. Sci Advice Catch levels should decrease (FAO, 2020). Management Management unit: No Sources FAO. 2019. Report of the FAO/CECAF Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish – Subgroup South. Elmina, Ghana, 12-20 September 2018. Rapport du Groupe de travail FAO/COPACE sur l’évaluation des petits poissons pélagiques – Sous-groupe Sud. Elmina, Ghana, 12-20 septembre 2018. CECAF/ECAF Series/COPACE/PACE Séries No. 19/81. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca5402b/ca5402b.pdfFAO. 2019. Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Report of the eighth session of the Scientific Sub-Committee, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 23–26 October 2018 / Comité des pêches pour l’Atlantique Centre-Est Rapport de la huitième session du Sous-Comité scientifique, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 23–26 octobre 2018. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report / FAO Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture No. 1265. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca5623b/ca5623b.pdfFAO. 2020. Report of the Twenty-Second Session of the Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Libreville, Gabon, 17–19 September 2019. Rapport de la vingt-deuxième session du comité des pêches pour l’Atlantique centre-est, Libreville, Gabon, 17–19 septembre 2019. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report / FAO, Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture No. 1303. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca8000b/CA8000B.pdf Bibliography All references to figures, tables and bibliography in the text are found within the source of information. |
|
| |
|
|