Fisheries and Resources Monitoring System

EspañolFrançais
Norway lobster - Noup
Fact Sheet Title  Fact Sheet
ICES Advice 2009
Norway lobster - Noup
Fact Sheet Citation  
Nephrops in Noup (FU 10)
Owned byInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) – ownership
ident Blockident Blockdisplay tree map
 
Species List:
Species Ref: en - Norway lobster, fr - Langoustine, es - Cigala
ident Block Norway lobster - Noup
Aq Res
Biological Stock: Yes         Value: Sub-Regional
Management unit: Yes        Reference year: 2008
 
 
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State TrendUndefinedUncertain/Not assessed
Aq Res State TrendUndefinedUncertain/Not assessed


Spawning biomass in relation to precautionary limits Fishing mortality in relation to precautionary limits Fishing mortality in relation to high long-term yield

Fishing mortality in relation to

agreed target

Comment

Unknown Unknown Unknown N/a


Habitat Bio
Depth Zone: Shelf (50 m - 200 m).   Vertical Dist: Demersal/Benthic.  

Geo Dist
Geo Dist: National

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional

Water Area Overview
Aq Res Struct
Biological Stock: Yes
Bio Assess
 
Sci Advice

Single-stock exploitation boundaries

The advice for 2009 is biannual and valid for 2009 and 2010 (see ICES, 2008).


Table 6.4.14.6.1 Nephrops, Noup (FU 10). Single-stock exploitation boundaries (advice), management, and landings.
Year ICES advice

Recommended

landings

Noup

(FU10)

Recommended landings FU9+FU10

ICES

Landings

FU101)

1987 0.04
1988 0.08
1989 0.08
1990 0.22
1991 0.19
1992 ~2.4 0.19
1993 2.4 0.38
1994 2.4 0.50
1995 2.4 0.28
1996 Status quo TAC 2.4 0.34
1997 Status quo TAC 2.4 0.32
1998 2.4 0.25
1999 2.4 0.28
2000 1.85 0.28
2001 1.85 0.18
2002 Catches to be maintained at the 2000 level 2.0 0.40
2003 Catches to be maintained at the 2000 level 2.0 0.34
2004 Catches to be maintained at the 2000 level 2.0 0.23
2005 Catches to be maintained at the 2000 level 2.0 0.17
2006 No increase in effort - 0.13
2007 No increase in effort, and recent average landings 0.24 2.64 0.15
2008 No new advice, same as for 2007 0.24 2.64 2) 0.17
2009 No increase in effort, and average landings 2003–2005 < 0.24
2010 No new advice, same as for 2009 < 0.24 --3)

Weights in ‘000 t.

1) Does not include discards.

2) Based on a 15% harvest rate applied to UWTV survey abundance data. Includes Moray Firth (FU 9).

3) It is not advised to manage these stocks as a single unit.

Management
Management unit: Yes
Sources
 
ICES.2009.Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2009. ICES Advice, 2009.
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2024
Powered by FIGIS
crawl