Fishery Resources Monitoring System

Français
Tusk - Northeast Atlantic, 2008
Marine Resource  Fact Sheet
ICES Advice 2009
Tusk - Northeast Atlantic, 2008
Fact Sheet Citation  
Tusk (Brosme brosme)
Owned byInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) – More
Related observationsLocate in inventorydisplay tree map
 
Species:
FAO Names: en - Tusk(=Cusk), fr - Brosme, es - Brosmio, ar - بروسمة, zh - 单鳍鳕, ru - Менек (=морской налим)
Geographic extent of Tusk - Northeast Atlantic
Main Descriptors
Considered a single stock: Yes        Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional
Management unit: Yes
 
 
Habitat and Biology
Depth zone: Slope (200 m - 1000 m).   Vertical distribution: Demersal/Benthic.  

Geographical Distribution
Jurisdictional distribution: Straddling between High Seas and EEZ

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional

Geo References
Resource Structure
Considered a single stock: Yes
Assessment
 
Overall Assessment Results

Table 9.4.12.1.
Figure 9.4.12.1. Tusk, total landings by Subareas or Division. Source: ICES estimates.


Management
Management unit: Yes

Management Objectives

Based on the new genetic information that has been analyzed in 2007, ICES presents advice for the following stock units of tusk:

  • Subareas I and II;
  • Division Va and Subarea XIV;
  • the Mid Atlantic Ridge (Division XII excluding XIIb, see Roundnose Grenadier);
  • Subarea VIb (Rockall);
  • Other areas (IIIa, IV, Vb, VIa, VII, VIII, IX, and XIIb). This latter grouping is a combination of isolated fishing grounds and these areas are grouped due to their mutual lack of data.


The new perception of the stock structure is based on considerations of new genetic information in 2007 (ICES, 2007). Studies using recently developed microsatellite primers detected highly significant genetic differentiation in tusk within its North Atlantic range. In particular, tusk around Rockall, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, and off Canada, most likely represent different biological populations that clearly warrant separate management considerations. For the remainder of the North Atlantic this study uncovered limited genetic differentiation, and no firm conclusion can be reached at present regarding the number of populations and assessment units. Samples from Storegga and Tromsøflaket (ICES Area II) are similar and may represent a single population in this area, and likewise for Greenland and Iceland. Tusk from around Faroe Islands differ significantly both from those from Iceland and Tromsøflaket, but the differences are small and it is at present unclear how these differences should be interpreted in terms of management implications. The geographical coverage of this study is insufficient to exclude the possibility of additional genetically differentiated populations of tusk. More samples are required from around Iceland, Faroe Islands, Hatton Bank, and Western Scotland to disentangle potential structure within and among these areas.

Previously, ICES has advised for three management units proposed on the basis of apparent isolation of fishing ground: I and II (Arctic), Va (Iceland), and IIIa, IVa, Vb,VI, VII, VIII, IX, XII, and XIV (other areas).

Tusk is primarily fished in the depth range 200–500 m, though it is also found at shallower depths. Tusk is more vulnerable to overexploitation than ling due to a slower growth rate and higher age at first maturity, but it is still less sensitive than other deep-water species (ICES, 2006, Section 8.2.2).
Biological State and Trend
Exploitation rate: Undefined
Abundance level: Undefined
Source of information
 
ICES.2009.Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2009. ICES Advice, 2009.
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2014
Powered by FIGIS
crawl