Habitat and Biology
Depth zone: Shelf (50 m - 200 m). Vertical distribution: Demersal/Benthic.
Flounder (Platichthys flesus
) is the most widely distributed among all flatfish species in the Baltic Sea. Flounder occurs in all parts of the Baltic except for the eastern part of Gulf of Finland (Subdivision 32) and the Bothnian Bay (Subdivision 31).
Based on egg buoyancy, there are two spawning groups of flounder in the Baltic: Shallow water spawners with the eggs developing in contact to the bottom, and deep-water spawners with eggs floating freely and developing in the water column. In total, there are indications of eleven flounder populations in the Baltic Sea. Deep-sea spawners (five populations) are located in the western and central parts of the Baltic Sea, while shallow water spawners (six populations) are found in the central and northern parts of the Baltic Sea.
Flounder spawning takes place from March to June. Nursery areas are located in shallow coastal waters where juveniles spend their first 2–3 years.
Jurisdictional distribution: Shared between nations
Considered a single stock: No
Flounder is taken as bycatch in demersal fisheries and, to a minor extent, in a directed fishery. Discard data were not available for all fleets, but preliminary analyses of Swedish bycatch and discard data shows that the amount discarded in the demersal trawling for cod can be very high and variable. Estimated discards of flounder may be five to ten times greater than the amounts of landed bycatches of flounder in the cod trawl fishery.
|Catch distribution ||No information on total catch (2011): 15 kt landings (mainly trawl fishery), high percentage of discards, mainly bycatch, no information on unaccounted removals. |
Based on the ICES approach for data-limited stocks, ICES advises that catches should be no more than 15 100 tonnes.
This is the first year that ICES is providing quantitative advice for data-limited stocks (see Quality considerations).
Overall Assessment Results
|Figure 126.96.36.199 Flounder in Subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea). Official landings in Subdivisions (SD) 24, 25, and the remaining subdivisions of the Baltic Sea (in tonnes, upper left panel). Combined 1st and 4th quarters cpue (no./hr) (weighted average per depth stratum area), of fish equal to or larger than 20 cm, from the BITS in SDs 22–28 (upper right), SD 22 (middle left), SD 24–25 (middle right), SD 26 (lower left), and SD 28 (lower right). Survey data from ICES DATRAS database. |
Assessment ModelQuality consideration
The uncertainty of the discard estimates is of concern. Discarding practices are controlled by factors such as market price and cod catches. The high variability in the discard ratios makes it extremely expensive and difficult to provide an accurate estimate of discards.
The advice is based on a combined abundance index from two surveys, used as an indicator of stock size. The uncertainty associated with the index values is not available.
The methods applied to derive quantitative advice for data-limited stocks are expected to evolve as they are further developed and validated. The harvest control rules are expected to stabilize stock size, but they may not be suitable if the stock size is low and/or overfishedScientific basis
|Assessment type ||Survey trends and preliminary XSA and difference models. |
| Input data ||Commercial landings and survey data from the Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS-Q1+Q4). |
|Discards and bycatch ||Information incomplete and not used in assessment. |
|Indicators ||None. |
|Other information ||None. |
|Working group report ||WGBFAS |
Management unit: YesManagement plans
No specific management objectives are known to ICES
Biological State and Trend
|Figure 188.8.131.52 |
Source of information
The above excerpts are from the first two pages of the ICES advice, the supporting information to this advice can be read in full at the following reference:
ICES. Flounder in Subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2012. ICES Advice, June 2012. http://www.ices.dk/committe/acom/comwork/report/2012/2012/fle-2232.pdf