|
| Marine Resource Fact Sheet |
| |
| | Herring - Gulf of Riga, 2005 |
| | |
| | Owned by | International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
more>> |
|
|
| Main Descriptors | Considered a single stock: Yes
Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional Considered a management unit: Yes |
| Considered a single stock: A group of individuals in a species occupying a well defined spatial range independent of other stocks of the same species. It can be affected by random dispersal movements and directed migrations due to seasonal or reproductive activity. |
| Spatial Scale: Spatial scale contains a standard term such as Global, Regional (e.g. for the whole Atlantic), sub-regional (e.g. for a part of the Atlantic), national, local (for sub-national levels). |
| Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
| Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
| Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
| | | | | | Habitat and Biology Depth zone: Shelf Vertical distribution: Pelagic Geographical Distribution Jurisdictional distribution: National Water Area Overview Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional Geo References  | | Distribution of Herring - Gulf of Riga
| FAO Fishing Statistical Subdivision Areas | 27.3.d.28: Atlantic, Northeast / 27.3.d.28 | | 27.3.d.29: Atlantic, Northeast / 27.3.d.29 |
| | | | | | Intersecting Major FAO areas and LME areas |
The following area codes have been found as intersecting the distribution of Herring - Gulf of Riga Resource Structure Considered a single stock: Yes Exploitation Factors affecting the fisheries and the stockThe Gulf of Riga is a separate semi-enclosed ecosystem of the Baltic Sea characterised by low salinity that restricts the occurrence of marine species. Therefore, herring is the dominant species in the Gulf, unlike the Baltic Proper. The bycatch of sprat in this fishery has recently been about 10% of the total catch. There is also a lack of abundant predators in the Gulf since cod is found in the Gulf of Riga only in the periods when the cod stock is very high (last time in the early 1980s). The environmentThe year-class strength of Gulf of Riga herring depends strongly on the severity of the winter. Recruitment predictions are based on average water temperature in April, when the spawning starts and the abundance of zooplankton in May, when the hatching of larvae begins. The period since the end of the 1980s, when the majority of winters have been mild, has been favourable for the reproduction of Gulf of Riga herring. Assessment Assessment Model Assessment Model Entry Data Scientific basisData and methodsThe assessment is based on catch data, a commercial cpue index, and an acoustic index. Recruitment predictions are based on two environmental indices. Overall Assessment Results Comparison with previous assessment and adviceThe current assessment has revised the value of SSB in 2004 downwards by 9% and fishing mortality in 2004 upwards by 14%.  | | Graphs |
 | | Graphs |
 | | Graphs |
 | | Graphs |
 | | Graphs |
 | | Graphs | Landing tableHerring catches in the Gulf of Riga by country. Landing table
|
Year
|
Estonia
|
Latvia
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
landings
|
|
|
1991
|
7420
|
13481
|
-
|
20901
|
|
1992
|
9742
|
14204
|
-
|
23946
|
|
1993
|
9537
|
13554
|
3446
|
26537
|
|
1994
|
9636
|
14050
|
3512
|
27198
|
|
1995
|
16008
|
17016
|
3401
|
36425
|
|
1996
|
11788
|
17362
|
3473
|
32623
|
|
1997
|
15819
|
21116
|
4223
|
41158
|
|
1998
|
11313
|
16125
|
3225
|
30663
|
|
1999
|
10245
|
20511
|
3077
|
33833
|
|
2000
|
12514
|
21624
|
3244
|
37382
|
|
2001
|
14311
|
22775
|
3416
|
40502
|
|
2002
|
16962
|
22441
|
3366
|
42769
|
|
2003
|
19647
|
21780
|
3267
|
44694
|
|
2004
|
18218
|
20903
|
3136
|
42257
|
|
2005
|
11213
|
19741
|
2961
|
33915
|
Herring in the Gulf of Riga. Stock summary
|
Year
|
Recruitment
|
SSB
|
Landings
|
Mean F
|
|
-
|
Age 1
|
-
|
-
|
Ages 3-7
|
|
|
thousands
|
tonnes
|
tonnes
|
|
|
1977
|
943316
|
54524
|
24186
|
0.6902
|
|
1978
|
1076601
|
49359
|
16728
|
0.3751
|
|
1979
|
977120
|
46743
|
17142
|
0.4309
|
|
1980
|
1110553
|
46720
|
14998
|
0.3498
|
|
1981
|
909000
|
47232
|
16769
|
0.4524
|
|
1982
|
1690925
|
42776
|
12777
|
0.4196
|
|
1983
|
1253087
|
50902
|
15541
|
0.4675
|
|
1984
|
2049739
|
39946
|
15843
|
0.7058
|
|
1985
|
1235975
|
52247
|
15575
|
0.5370
|
|
1986
|
1038622
|
62517
|
16927
|
0.5071
|
|
1987
|
3605778
|
49094
|
12884
|
0.4243
|
|
1988
|
525759
|
89607
|
16791
|
0.5298
|
|
1989
|
1230387
|
57524
|
16783
|
0.3867
|
|
1990
|
3428267
|
69320
|
14931
|
0.2677
|
|
1991
|
3650100
|
77418
|
14791
|
0.3148
|
|
1992
|
4253070
|
96815
|
20000
|
0.3274
|
|
1993
|
3277176
|
112923
|
22200
|
0.2732
|
|
1994
|
2875114
|
119547
|
24300
|
0.2631
|
|
1995
|
3556283
|
113921
|
32656
|
0.3729
|
|
1996
|
4891918
|
104359
|
32584
|
0.3908
|
|
1997
|
1627463
|
106453
|
39843
|
0.4867
|
|
1998
|
2895800
|
85704
|
29443
|
0.4210
|
|
1999
|
2973446
|
90529
|
31403
|
0.3767
|
|
2000
|
2752461
|
92029
|
34069
|
0.3861
|
|
2001
|
6749079
|
87416
|
38785
|
0.4457
|
|
2002
|
2266018
|
115788
|
39701
|
0.3822
|
|
2003
|
7924983
|
99107
|
40803
|
0.4355
|
|
2004
|
1532340
|
111549
|
39115
|
0.4490
|
|
2005
|
4422505
|
96707
|
32225
|
0.3733
|
|
2006*
|
3213330
|
-
|
|
|
|
Average
|
2664541
|
79170
|
24131
|
0.4221
|
* RCT3 estimate. Reference Point Reference pointsYield and spawning biomass per Recruit F-reference points Reference points
|
|
Fish Mort
|
Yield/R
|
SSB/R
|
|
|
Ages 3–7
|
|
|
|
Average last 3 years
|
0.419
|
0.009
|
0.026
|
|
F
max
|
0.835
|
0.010
|
0.014
|
|
F
0.1
|
0.264
|
0.009
|
0.036
|
|
F
med
|
0.297
|
0.009
|
0.033
|
Technical basis Reference pointsProjection Short term implicationsOutlook for 2007Basis: F(2006) = Fsq = 0.42; Landings(2006) = 39.5; SSB(2006) = 106.4. Outlook for 2007
|
Rationale
|
TAC
(2007)
|
F
(2007)
|
Basis
|
SSB
(2007)
|
SSB
(2008)
|
%SSB change
|
%TAC change
|
|
Zero catch
|
0
|
0.0
|
F=0
|
106.4
|
132.1
|
24%
|
-100%
|
|
Status quo
|
35.4
|
0.42
|
F
sq
|
98.7
|
89.7
|
-9%
|
-12%
|
|
Precautionary limits
|
3.9
|
0.04
|
F
pa
* 0.1
|
105.6
|
127.2
|
20%
|
-90%
|
|
9.6
|
0.10
|
F
pa
* 0.25
|
104.5
|
120.3
|
15%
|
-76%
|
|
18.4
|
0.20
|
F
pa
* 0.5
|
102.6
|
109.6
|
7%
|
-54%
|
|
26.0
|
0.30
|
F
pa
* 0.75
|
100.8
|
100.0
|
-1%
|
-34%
|
|
31.1
|
0.36
|
F
pa
* 0.9
|
99.8
|
94.7
|
-5%
|
-22%
|
|
34.0
|
0.40
|
F
pa
|
99.0
|
91.3
|
-8%
|
-15%
|
|
36.8
|
0.44
|
F
pa
* 1.1
|
98.3
|
88.1
|
-10%
|
-8%
|
|
40.9
|
0.50
|
F
pa
* 1.25
|
97.3
|
83.5
|
-14%
|
2%
|
Weights in ‘000 t. Shaded scenarios are not considered consistent with the Precautionary Approach. Scientific Advice Single stock exploitation boundariesExploitation boundaries in relation to precautionary limitsFishing in 2006 below Fpa (= 0.4) corresponds to landings of at most 33 900 t in 2007. Management considerationsThe assessment is based on landings of the Gulf of Riga herring taken both in and outside the Gulf. The TAC is applied only to herring caught in the Gulf of Riga, which includes some small percentage of open-sea herring, but not to Gulf of Riga herring taken outside the Gulf of Riga. Fishing at Fpa (0.4) is expected to reduce the SSB slightly in the short term. However, SSB will remain well above Bpa. Management Considered a management unit: Yes Management Objectives There are no explicit management objectives for this stock. Catch and TACSCatch and TACSWeights in ‘000 t. * The possible catch of open-sea herring is not included. ** The possible catch of open-sea herring is included. Biological State and Trend State of the stockBased on the most recent estimates of SSB and fishing mortality, ICES classifies the stock as having full reproductive capacity and as being harvested sustainably. Based on high recruitment, SSB increased in the beginning of the 1990s and has remained high thereafter. Source of information Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2006. ICES  . Bibliography Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group. Rostock, 18 – 27 April 2006, ICES CM 2006/ACFM:24. |
|
| |
|