Overall Assessment Results
Comparison with previous assessment and adviceAs last year, the assessment is indicative of trends only, and this year’s advice is based on the most recent catch.
 |
| Graphs |
Figure 6.4.6.1 Plaice in Division IIIa (Skagerrak–Kattegat). Landings.
 |
| Graphs |
Figure 6.4.6.2 Spatial distribution of recorded landings of plaice.
 |
| Graphs |
Figure 6.4.6.3 Distribution and abundance of plaice from IBTS Q1 (Figure from Casini et al., 2005).
 |
| Graphs |
Figure 6.4.6.4 Plaice IIIa. Retrospective survey-only assessments (SURBA) using all available survey data.
Landing table |
| Landing table |
Reference Point
Reference pointsProjection
Short-term implicationsNo short-term forecasts were performed.
Scientific Advice
Single-stock exploitation boundariesExploitation boundaries in relation to precautionary considerationsThere are indications that the biomass and recruitment has increased in the recent years. There are no indications that the current catch level is detrimental to the stock and therefore the advice for 2008 is not to increase the catches above the most recent catch of 9400 t (2006).
Management considerationsPlaice is taken both in a directed fishery and in a mixed cod-
Nephrops-plaice fishery. The stock area for North Sea cod includes the Skagerrak (Division IIIaN). Both North Sea cod and Kattegat (Division IIIa South) cod are well below B
lim. Thus, monitoring of the mixed fishery in terms of cod bycatch and discarding should be continued, and measures to prevent significant cod bycatch should be considered.
A summary of biological inference on stock entity on plaice in these waters can be summarized as follows: Plaice in Eastern Skagerrak and Kattegat mix and Western Skagerrak plaice might be recruited partly from the North Sea. Kattegat plaice may expand its distribution area to the Belt Sea, but there is evidence of insignificant connection with the Western Baltic plaice stock. In conclusion, the current management area of Division IIIa appears appropriate with regards to the biological identity of the stock. However, most catches are reported at the boundary with the North Sea stock distribution, where their exact stock origin is uncertain. This may affect the appropriateness of the management because the basis for the advice is based on the catch levels and not on the assessment based on survey indices.
The IBTS survey as well as the application of the data should be intensified in Division IIIa.
Ecosystem considerationsThe large-scale circulation pattern in the northern Kattegat depends mainly on the interaction between Baltic runoffs and local variations due to wind stress. Nielsen
et al. (1998) demonstrated that the abundance of settled 0-group plaice along the Danish coast of the Kattegat depends on transport from the Skagerrak. The 0-group abundance measured in July–August was significantly higher in years when wind conditions during the larval development period (March–April) were moderate to strong. This might imply that larval plaice are food-limited in years when calm conditions prevail during the larval drift period (Nielsen
et al., 1998). There are consistent migration patterns of adult fish in the northwestern direction, from South Kattegat to North Kattegat and from North Kattegat to Eastern Skagerrak.