Français
Haddock - North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, 2006
Marine Resource  Fact Sheet
SearchSavePrint
Stock status report
Haddock - North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, 2006
Haddock in Sub-area IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat)
Fact Sheet Citation  
Owned byInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)   more>>
Related observationsLocate in inventorydisplay tree map
 
Species:
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
Fao Names :  en - Haddock, fr - Églefin, es - Eglefino
Distribution of Haddock - North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat
 Map legend

Area Details Advanced search
Main Descriptors
Considered a single stock: Yes        Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional
Considered a management unit: Yes
 
 
Habitat and Biology
Depth zone: Shelf    Vertical distribution: Demersal/benthic    

Geographical Distribution
Jurisdictional distribution: Shared between nations

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: Sub-Regional

Geo References
Resource Structure
Considered a single stock: Yes
Exploitation
 

Factors affecting the fisheries and the stock


Haddock are generally caught in mixed fisheries along with cod, Nephrops, and whiting.

Regulations and their effects


EU technical regulations in force are contained in Council Regulation (EC) 850/98 and its amendments. The regulation prescribes the minimum target species composition for different mesh size ranges. In 2001, haddock in the whole of NEAFC region 2 were a legitimate target species for towed gears with a minimum codend mesh size of 100 mm. As part of the cod recovery measures, the EU and Norway introduced additional technical measures from 1 January 2002 (EC 2056/2001). The basic minimum mesh size for towed gears for cod from 2002 was 120 mm, although in a transitional arrangement running until 31 December 2002 vessels were allowed to exploit cod with 110-mm codends, provided that the trawl was fitted with a 90-mm square mesh panel and the catch composition of cod retained on-board was not greater than 30% by weight of the total catch. From 1 January 2003, the basic minimum mesh size for towed gears for cod was 120 mm. The minimum mesh size for vessels targeting haddock in Norwegian waters is also 120 mm.

Effort restrictions in the EC were introduced in 2003 (EC 2341/2002, Annex XVII, amended in EC 671/2003). Effort restriction measures were revised for 2005 (EC 27/2005, Annex IV). Preliminary analysis of fishing effort trends in the major fleets exploiting North Sea cod indicates that fishing effort in those fleets has been decreasing since the mid-1990s due to a combination of decommissioning and days-at-sea regulations. The decrease in effort is most pronounced in the years 2002 and beyond.

The effects of these regulations have not been evaluated by ICES.

Changes in fishing technology and fishing patterns


The change in mesh size might be expected to shift exploitation patterns to older ages and increase the weight-at-age for retained fish from younger age classes. Improvements in the exploitation pattern have not been observed. It was not possible to examine if this is due to confounding effects from other fleet segments. Information presented to ICES noted that the UK large-mesh demersal trawl fleet category (>100 mm, 4A) has been reduced by decommissioning and days-at-sea regulations to 40% of the levels recorded in the EU reference year of 2001. There was a movement into the 70- to 90-mm sector to increase days at sea in 2002 and 2003, but the level of effort stabilized in 2004. From the EU reference year of 2001 the effort of the combined trawl gears has shown a continued decrease of 36% overall.
Assessment
 
Assessment Model
Assessment Model Entry
Data

Scientific basis


Data and methods


The age-based assessment model (XSA) is calibrated with three survey indices.Discards and industrial bycatch were included in the assessment for the North Sea only. Discards were estimated from the Scottish discards sampling programme, raised to the total international fleet.

The 1999–2000 year classes are slow-growing. This has been taken into account in the forecast.

The contributions of various catch components to the catch are shown in Figure 6.4.3.3.

Uncertainties in assessment and forecast


Stock dynamics estimated using several different sources of information were consistent. The assessment and forecast are largely influenced by the strong 1999 year class.
Overall Assessment Results

Exploitation boundaries in relation to high long-term yield, low risk of depletion of production potential and considering ecosystem effects


The current fishing mortality is estimated at 0.49, which is above the management plan target rate expected to lead to high long-term yields (Fmp = 0.3). Fishing at Fmp is expected to lead to landings of 46 600 t in 2008.

Comparison with previous assessment and advice


In the present assessment, the age range has been extended to accommodate the 1999 year class as a true age group. Since conclusions regarding stock status remain similar to the previous assessment, the advice also remains similar.
Graphs 

Figure Haddock in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa (Skagerrak–Kattegat). Stock and recruitment.
Graphs 


Figure Haddock in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa (Skagerrak–Kattegat). Summary plots. The dotted horizontal lines indicate Fpa (top centre plot) and Bpa (bottom left plot), while the solid ones indicate Flim (top centre plot) and Blim (bottom left plot).
Graphs 

Figure 6.4.3.3 Haddock in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa (Skagerrak–Kattegat). Contributions of various catch components to the total catch.

Graphs 

Figure 6.4.3.4 Haddock in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa (Skagerrak–Kattegat). Historical performance of the assessments. Note: ages for mean fishing mortality has changed in 2004. Variations in estimated historical SSB since 2001 stem almost entirely from variability in the estimates of the 1999 year class in successive years.

Landings


Table 6.4.3.1 Haddock in Subarea IV and Division IIIa. Nominal catch (‘000 t) 1999–2006, as officially reported to ICES and estimated by ACFM.
Landings 

Table 6.4.3.2 Haddock in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division IIIa.LandingsAnnex 6.4.3 EU and Norway Management plan

“The plan shall consist of the following elements:

Every effort shall be made to maintain a minimum level of Spawning Stock Biomass greater than 100,000 tonnes (Blim).
For 2007 and subsequent years the Parties agreed to restrict their fishing on the basis of a TAC consistent with a fishing mortality rate of no more than 0.3 for appropriate age-groups, when the SSB in the end of the year in which the TAC is applied is estimated above 140,000 tonnes (Bpa).
Where the rule in paragraph 2 would lead to a TAC which deviates by more than 15% from the TAC of the preceding year the Parties shall establish a TAC that is no more than 15% greater or 15% less than the TAC of the preceding year.
Where the SSB referred to in paragraph 2 is estimated to be below Bpa but above Blim the TAC shall not exceed a level which will result in a fishing mortality rate equal to 0.3-0.2*(Bpa-SSB)/(Bpa-Blim). This consideration overrides paragraph 3.
Where the SSB referred to in paragraph 2 is estimated to be below Blim the TAC shall be set at a level corresponding to a total fishing mortality rate of no more than 0.1. This consideration overrides paragraph 3.
In order to reduce discarding and to increase the spawning stock biomass and the yield of haddock, the Parties agreed that the exploitation pattern shall, while recalling that other demersal species are harvested in these fisheries, be improved in the light of new scientific advice from inter alia ICES.
In the event that ICES advices that changes are required to the precautionary reference points Bpa (140 000t) or Blim (100 000t) the parties shall meet to review paragraphs 1-5.
No later than 31 December 2009, the parties shall review the arrangements in paragraphs 1 to 7 in order to ensure that they are consistent with the objective of the plan. This review shall be conducted after obtaining inter alia advice from ICES concerning the performance of the plan in relation to its objective.

This arrangement enters into force on 1 January 2007.”
Reference Point
 
Reference points
Yield and spawning biomass per Recruit F-reference points (from the 2004 assessment):
Reference points
  Fish Mort Yield/R SSB/R
  Ages 3–7    
Average last 3 years 0.37 0.004 0.014
Fmax 0.32 0.004 0.016
F0.1 0.20 0.004 0.024
Fmed 0.50 0.004 0.010


Candidates for reference points which are consistent with high long-term yields and a low risk of depleting the productive potential of the stock are in the range of F0.1–Fmax, and the current target Fy = 0.3 in the management plan is within this range.
Projection

Short-term implications


Outlook for 2008


Basis: TAC constraint on HC fishery, F = 0.38; R07–09 = (average of 5 lowest in 1994–2003) = 6494 million;
SSB(2008) = 317 000 t; HC landings (2007) = 58 000 t; Discards (2007) = 32 900 t; Industrial bycatch (2007) = 0 t.Outlook for 2008Weights in ‘000 t.
Shaded scenarios are considered inconsistent with the precautionary approach.
1 Reduced to allow for industrial bycatch in 2008.

The option table is based on no industrial bycatch in 2007. Such bycatches are mainly taken in the Norway pout fishery which ICES advises should remain closed. If this fishery were to be opened in 2007, it would result in a small haddock bycatch. The forecast assumes that there will be an industrial bycatch in 2008, although this cannot be ascertained at present. However, this would not alter the haddock TAC for 2008 according to the management plan because this is based on the 15% restriction and not on a SSB consideration.
Scientific Advice

Single-stock exploitation boundaries


Exploitation boundaries in relation to existing management plans


At the present SSB level, F should be less or equal to 0.3 to be in accordance with the management plan which also dictates that the TAC change shall be subject to a limit of 15% change. In this case the 15% limit is the determining factor and corresponds to landings of less than 49 300 t in 2008, which is expected to lead to an SSB of 306 000 t in 2009.

Exploitation boundaries in relation to precautionary considerations


The fishing mortality in 2008 should be at or below Fpa, corresponding to human consumption catches of no more than 96 100 t in 2008.

Conclusion on exploitation boundaries


The agreed management plan can be provisionally accepted as precautionary and ICES therefore advises according to this plan. This implies a TAC of 49 300 t in 2008, which should include industrial bycatch..

Management considerations


Information on fishing effort indicates significant reductions in the fleet sectors taking the largest proportion of haddock. In addition , the minimum mesh size has been increased in recent years and gear selectivity measures have been introduced to allow for the release of small fish. The reduction in effort and the technical measures may have led to the significant reduction in fishing mortality in the recent past. However, discarding still occurs and is substantial (29% by weight, average 2002–2005), particularly as is currently the case when larger year classes recruit to the fishery.

The stock and fishery are presently dominated by the strong 1999 year class, followed by a sequence of poor recruitment through 2004. Nevertheless, it is expected that the spawning stock will remain stable in 2007 and 2008 because of the remaining 1999 year class and the recruitment of the moderately-sized 2005 year class.

The advice on landings assumes that the industrial fishery bycatch will be 0 t in 2007 and that the fraction of the catch-at-age that is discarded remains stable. For 2007, that would imply discards of 32 900 t.

Reducing discards would improve landing opportunities.

The June advice includes information on several North Sea stocks, advice that previously has only been available in October. This change is intended to allow more time for stakeholder consultations. ICES has introduced this change on an experimental basis and will evaluate the implications in the autumn. Changing the timing of the advice will also have effects on the workplans in the scientific laboratories and in the expert groups. The yield projections are based on data including the 1st quarter of 2007 (e.g. 1st quarter IBTS). For stocks like cod, haddock, plaice, and sole there will be new recruitment information from the 3rd quarter surveys. ICES will only issue an updated advice if these surveys provide a very different perspective on the short-term developments.

Management plan evaluations


The evaluations of the management plan have been carried out using a recruitment model which is thought to capture the sporadic nature of haddock recruitment. On this basis, a target F = 0.3 with TAC constraint ±15% leads to a low risk of <12% in any year, and a mean risk of 5% over all years of B < Blim over the next 20 years. Lower Fs lead to lower risks.

Although the management plan has not been fully tested (e.g. at lower fishing mortalities), ICES concludes that the management plan can be provisionally accepted as precautionary and be used as the basis for advice.
Management
Considered a management unit: Yes

Management Objectives

In 1999 the EU and Norway agreed to implement a long-term management plan for the haddock stock, which is consistent with the precautionary approach and is intended to constrain harvesting within safe biological limits (SSB>Blim) and designed to provide for sustainable fisheries and greater potential yield (F = 0.3). The management plan is copied at the end of this section (Annex 6.4.3).
ICES considers that the agreed reference points in the management plan are consistent with the precautionary approach, provided they are used as lower boundaries on SSB, and not as targets. ICES has evaluated the management plan and concluded that the target F = 0.3 with TAC constraint ±15% leads on average to a <5% risk of B < Blim within the next 20 years. Increasing the target F increases the risk. Although the management plan has not been fully tested (e.g. at lower fishing mortalities), ICES concludes that the management plan can provisionally be accepted as precautionary and be used as the basis for advice.

Catch and TACs


Subarea IVCatch and TACs Weights in ‘000 t. 1Only pertaining to the North Sea. 2 For the whole stock (IIIa and IV). 3 Including industrial bycatch. * Single-stock boundary and the exploitation of this stock should be conducted in the context of mixed fisheries protecting stocks outside safe biological limits.Division IIIaCatch and TACs Weights in ‘000 t. n/a = not available.
Biological State and Trend
Exploitation rate:   Harvested sustainably                   
Abundance level:   Full reproductive capacity    

State of the stock
Based on the most recent estimate of SSB and fishing mortality, ICES classifies the stock as having full reproductive capacity and being harvested sustainably. SSB in 2006 is estimated at 238 000 t. SSB is above the Bpa. The stock is still dominated by the strong 1999 year class and the 2005 year class is also estimated to be above average. Fishing mortality in 2006 is estimated at 0.49, which is below Fpa.
Source of information
 

Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak, 1–8 May 2007 (ICES CM 2007/ACFM:18).
ICES Click to open.
powered by FIGIS   © FAO, 2000-2008
crawl