|
Fact Sheet Title Fact Sheet |
| |
Longtail tuna - Indian Ocean |
Longtail tuna Indian Ocean |
| Data Ownership | This document provided, maintained and owned by Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) , is part of IOTC Stock Status Reports data collection. |
|
ident Block | ident Block | | Species List: | Species Ref: en - Longtail tuna, fr - Thon mignon, es - Atún tongol |
Fishery IndicatorsProduction: Catch |
|
| ident Block Longtail tuna - Indian Ocean
Map tips
- Click on to turn layers on and off
- Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
fao Major |
---|
51 | Indian Ocean, Western |
---|
57 | Indian Ocean, Eastern |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Aq Res | Biological Stock: Yes
Management unit: Yes Reference year: 2019 |
Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
Reference Year: The Reference Year is the last year considered in the stock assessment and/or fishery status. |
| | | | Habitat Bio Climatic Zone: Temperate; Tropical. Horizontal Dist: Oceanic. Vertical Dist: Pelagic. Geo Dist Geo Dist: Highly migratory Geo Dist | Geo Dist Longtail tuna - Indian Ocean
fao Major | 51: Indian Ocean, Western | 57: Indian Ocean, Eastern |
| | | | Geo Dist |
Geo DistLongtail tuna - Indian Ocean fao Major | 51:
Indian Ocean, Western | 57:
Indian Ocean, Eastern | Large Marine Ecosystem Areas (LME) | 30: Agulhas Current | 31: Somali Coastal Current | 32: Arabian Sea | 33: Red Sea | 34: Bay of Bengal | 38: Indonesian Sea | 39: North Australian Shelf | 42: Southeast Australian Shelf | 43: Southwest Australian Shelf | 44: West-Central Australian Shelf | 45: Northwest Australian Shelf |
Aq Res Struct Biological Stock: Yes No information is available on the stock structure of longtail tuna in the Indian Ocean. The IOTC coordinated Stock Structure Project, which commenced in early-2015, aims to supplement gaps in the existing knowledge on biological data, and in particular provide an insight on whether neritic tuna and tuna like species should be considered as a single Indian Ocean stock. Exploit Fishery Indicators Type | Measure | Value | Unit | Time period |
---|
Production | Catch | 3564 | tonnes | Average 1950 - 1959 | Catch | 7230 | tonnes | Average 1960 - 1969 | Catch | 12681 | tonnes | Average 1970 - 1979 | Catch | 35901 | tonnes | Average 1980 - 1989 | Catch | 58852 | tonnes | Average 1990 - 1999 | Catch | 96029 | tonnes | Average 2000 - 2009 | Catch | 147223 | tonnes | Average 2010 - 2019 | Catch | 171633 | tonnes | 2011 | Catch | 176724 | tonnes | 2012 | Catch | 158193 | tonnes | 2013 | Catch | 148661 | tonnes | 2014 | Catch | 140008 | tonnes | 2015 | Catch | 141352 | tonnes | 2016 | Catch | 144970 | tonnes | 2017 | Catch | 136154 | tonnes | 2018 | Catch | 112914 | tonnes | 2019 | Catch | 132529 | tonnes | 2020 |
Bio Assess No new assessment was conducted for longtail tuna in 2021 and so the results are based on the assessment carried out in 2020 using the Optimised Catch-Only Method (OCOM). Analysis using the OCOM indicates that the stock is being exploited at a rate that exceeded FMSY in recent years and that the stock appears to be below BMSY and above FMSY (76% of plausible models runs) (Fig. 2). Catches were above MSY between 2010 and 2018 but steadily declined from 2012 to were less than 113,000 t in 2019, below the estimated MSY (Fig. 1). The F2018/FMSY ratio is slightly higher than previous estimates. The estimate of the B2018 /BMSY ratio (0.69) was lower than in previous years, reflecting declining abundance. An assessment using a biomass dynamic model incorporating gillnet CPUE indices was also undertaken in 2020 and results were consistent with OCOM in terms of status. Therefore, based on the weight-of-evidence currently available, the stock is considered to be both overfished and subject to overfishing (Table 1; Fig. 2). Assess Models Type: Biomass-aggregated Optimised Catch Only Method (OCOM) Sci Advice The catch in 2019 was below the estimated MSY but the exploitation rate has been increasing over the last few years, as a result of the declining abundance. Despite the substantial uncertainties, this suggests that the stock is very close to being fished at MSY levels and that higher catches may not be sustained. A precautionary approach to management is recommended. Management Management unit: Yes Sources IOTC–SC23 2020. Report of the 23rd Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee. Seychelles, 7 – 11 December 2020. IOTC–2020–SC23–R[E]: 211pp. https://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2021/06/IOTC-2020-SC23-RE_Rev1.pdf Bibliography All references to figures, tables and bibliography in the text are found within the source of information. |
|
| |
|