|
| Marine Resource Fact Sheet |
| |
| Indo-Pacific king mackerel - Indian Ocean |
| Indo-Pacific king mackerel Indian Ocean |
| | Data Ownership | | This document provided, maintained and owned by Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) , is part of IOTC Stock Status Reports data collection. |
|
| Related observations | Locate in inventory | | | | Species: | | FAO Names: en - Indo-Pacific king mackerel, fr - Thazard ponctué indo-pacifique, es - Carite del Indo-Pacífico |
Fishery IndicatorsProduction: Catch |
|
| Geographic extent of Indo-Pacific king mackerel - Indian Ocean Map tips - Click on
to turn layers on and off - Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
| FAO Major Fishing Areas |
|---|
| 51 | Indian Ocean, Western |
|---|
| 57 | Indian Ocean, Eastern |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Main Descriptors | Considered a single stock: Yes Management unit: Yes Reference year: 2014 |
| Considered a single stock: A group of individuals in a species occupying a well defined spatial range independent of other stocks of the same species. It can be affected by random dispersal movements and directed migrations due to seasonal or reproductive activity. |
| Spatial Scale: Spatial scale contains a standard term such as Global, Regional (e.g. for the whole Atlantic), sub-regional (e.g. for a part of the Atlantic), national, local (for sub-national levels). |
| Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is effectively the focus for the application of selected management methods and measures, within the broader framework of a management system. According to the FAO Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be organised around fisheries biological, geographic, economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions , and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management unit depends mainly on the FMP's management objectives. |
| Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g. "shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic resource related with its spatial distribution. |
| Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic resource according to the environmental group (e.g. pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the species belong. |
| Reference Year: The Reference Year is the last year considered in the stock assessment and/or fishery status. |
| | | | | | Biological State and Trend Habitat and Biology Climatic zone: Temperate; Tropical. Horizontal distribution: Oceanic. Vertical distribution: Pelagic. Geographical Distribution Jurisdictional distribution: Highly migratory Geo References  | | Geographic extent of Indo-Pacific king mackerel - Indian Ocean
| FAO Major Fishing Areas | 51: Indian Ocean, Western | | 57: Indian Ocean, Eastern |
| | | | | | Intersecting Major FAO areas and LME areas |
The following area codes have been found as intersecting the distribution of Indo-Pacific king mackerel - Indian Ocean | FAO Major Fishing Areas | 51: Indian Ocean, Western | | 57: Indian Ocean, Eastern | | Large Marine Ecosystem Areas (LME) | 30: Agulhas Current | | 31: Somali Coastal Current | | 32: Arabian Sea | | 33: Red Sea | | 34: Bay of Bengal | | 38: Indonesian Sea | | 39: North Australian Shelf | | 42: Southeast Australian Shelf | | 43: Southwest Australian Shelf | | 44: West-Central Australian Shelf | | 45: Northwest Australian Shelf |
Resource Structure Considered a single stock: Yes No information is available on the stock structure of Indo-Pacific king mackerel stock structure in Indian Ocean. The IOTC coordinated Stock Structure Project, which commenced in early-2015, aims to supplement gaps in the existing knowledge on biological data, and in particular provide an insight on whether neritic tuna and tuna like species should be considered as a single Indian Ocean stock. Exploitation Fishery Indicators | Type | Measure | Value | Unit | Time period |
|---|
| Production | Catch | 4630 | tonnes | Average 1950 - 1959 | | Catch | 7274 | tonnes | Average 1960 - 1969 | | Catch | 14798 | tonnes | Average 1970 - 1979 | | Catch | 22893 | tonnes | Average 1980 - 1989 | | Catch | 29415 | tonnes | Average 1990 - 1999 | | Catch | 36428 | tonnes | Average 2000 - 2009 | | Catch | 47880 | tonnes | 2008 | | Catch | 53448 | tonnes | 2009 | | Catch | 42260 | tonnes | 2010 | | Catch | 44653 | tonnes | 2011 | | Catch | 42492 | tonnes | 2012 | | Catch | 46305 | tonnes | 2013 | | Catch | 49465 | tonnes | 2014 | | Catch | 47541 | tonnes | 2015 | | Catch | 46603 | tonnes | 2016 | | Catch | 52555 | tonnes | 2017 |
Assessment Following a first data-poor assessment in 2015, Indo-Pacific king mackerel was again assessed using SRA techniques (Catch-MSY and OCOM) in 2016. The OCOM model, considered the more robust of the two SRA models applied in terms of assumptions and treatment of priors, indicates that overfishing is not occurring and the stock is not overfished (Fig. 1; Table 1). Moreover, the average catches (c. 45,000 t) over the last 5 years have been within the estimated MSY range (43,000 – 46,000 t). However, catches have increased in the last 2 years and in 2014 exceeded this MSY range. The continuing low levels of catch reporting for this species, coupled with the highly variable and uncertain estimates of growth parameters used to estimate model priors, prompted the WPNT to exercise caution in interpreting model results for king mackerel. Consequently, and similar to 2015, the WPNT considered that stock status in relation to the Commission’s BMSY and FMSY target reference points remains uncertain (Table 1), indicating that a precautionary approach to the management of Indo-Pacific king mackerel should be adopted. Assessment Model Type: Biomass-aggregated Optimised Catch Only Method (OCOM) Scientific Advice A precautionary approach to the management of Indo-Pacific king mackerel should be considered by the Commission, by ensuring that catches are reduced to levels below the current estimated range of MSY. The stock should be closely monitored. Mechanisms need to be developed by the Commission to improve current statistics by encouraging CPCs [Contracting parties and cooperating non-contracting parties] to comply with their recording and reporting requirement, so as to better inform scientific advice. Management Management unit: Yes Source of information IOTC–SC21 2018. Report of the 21st Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee. Seychelles, 3 – 7 December 2018. IOTC–2018–SC21–R[E]: 250 pp. https://iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019/02/IOTC-2018-SC21-RE_FINAL_DO_NOT_MODIFY_Rev1.pdf Bibliography All references to figures, tables and bibliography in the text are found within the source of information. |
|
| |
|