Northern Bluefin tuna - Western Atlantic, 2007|
| Marine Resource Fact Sheet |
| | | | Northern Bluefin tuna - Western Atlantic, 2007 |
| | Northern bluefin tuna in the Western Atlantic |
| |
| | Owned by | International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
more>> |
| | | Main Descriptors | Considered a single stock: Yes
Spatial Scale: Regional Considered a management unit: Yes |
| Considered a single stock: A group of individuals in a species occupying a well defined spatial range independent of other stocks of the same species. It can be affected by random dispersal movements and directed migrations due to seasonal or reproductive activity. |
| Spatial Scale: Spatial scale contains a standard term such as Global, Regional (e.g. for the whole Atlantic), sub-regional (e.g. for a part of the Atlantic), national, local (for sub-national levels). |
| Considered a management unit: An aquatic resource or fishery is
declared as [Fishery] Management Unit if it is
effectively the focus for the application of selected
management methods and measures, within the broader
framework of a management system. According to the FAO
Glossary for Responsible Fishing, "a Fishery Management
Unit (FMU) is a fishery or a portion of a fishery
identified in a Fishery Management Plan (FMP) relevant
to the FMP's management objectives." FMU's may be
organised around fisheries biological, geographic,
economic, technical, social or ecological dimensions ,
and the makeup and attribute of a fishery management
unit depends mainly on the FMP's management
objectives. |
| Jurisdictional distribution: Jurisdictional qualifier (e.g.
"shared", "shared - highly migratory") of the aquatic
resource related with its spatial distribution. |
| Environmental group: Classification of the aquatic
resource according to the environmental group (e.g.
pelagic invertebrate, or demersal fish) to which the
species belong. |
| | | | | | History In response to [Rec. 06-05] and [Rec. 06-06], the SCRS conducted updated assessments of the status of the bluefin tuna resource in the Atlantic, taking into account the most recently available catch and effort data. In the case of the western stock, the available data included catch, effort and size statistics through 2007, while for the eastern stock, data for 2007 were unavailable for analysis during the assessment session. There are considerable data limitations for the eastern stock for the recent period. These include poor temporal and spatial coverage for detailed size and catch-effort statistics for many fisheries, especially in the Mediterranean. Substantial under-reporting of total catches is also evident. Nevertheless, the Committee assessed the stock in 2008 as requested by the Commission. Habitat and Biology Climatic zone: Temperate Vertical distribution: Pelagic Currently, bluefin tuna is assumed to mature at 4 years of age (approximately 25 kg) in the Mediterranean and at 8 years of age (approximately 140 kg) in the Gulf of Mexico. Juvenile and adult bluefin tuna are opportunistic feeders (as are most predators) and their diet can include jellyfish and salps, as well as demersal and sessile species such as, octopus, crabs and sponges. However, in general, juveniles feed on crustaceans, fish and cephalopods, while adults primarily feed on fish such as herring, anchovy, sand lance, sardine, sprat, bluefish and mackerel. Juvenile growth is rapid for a teleost fish (about 30cm/year), but slower than other tuna and billfish species. Fish born in June attain a length of about 30-40cm long and a weight of about 1 kg by October. After one year, fish reach about 4 kg and 60cm long. Growth in length tends to be lower for adults than juveniles, but growth in weight increases. At 10 years old, a bluefin tuna is about 200cm and 150 kg and reaches about 300cm and 400 kg at 20 years. However, there remain large uncertainties about bluefin tuna growth curves. Bluefin tuna is a long lived species, with a lifespan of 20 years or more, as indicated by recent studies from radiocarbon deposition.
In the 2006 stock assessment conducted by the SCRS, a need to integrate recent and anticipated advances in otolith microconstituent analyses, age determination, archival tagging and genetics into the next assessment and management evaluation processes, was noted. While more work needs to be completed, the SCRS has achieved important progress towards that goal. Concerning age determination, the SCRS received new information that presented a novel approach for determining age and area of natal origin from the same otolith, allowing construction of area-specific growth curves. The preliminary results diverge considerably from the age-length relationship used by the SCRS for the western stock, and could have significant impacts for estimates of stock productivity.
Geographical Distribution Jurisdictional distribution: Highly migratory The geographical distribution of bluefin tuna is wide and covers almost the entire Atlantic Ocean between 65ºN and 40ºS. Geo References  | | Distribution of Northern Bluefin tuna - Western Atlantic
| ICCAT spatial management units - Northern bluefin tuna | BFT_W: West Atlantic |
| | | | | | Intersecting Major FAO areas and LME areas |
The following area codes have been found as intersecting the distribution of Northern Bluefin tuna - Western Atlantic Resource Structure Considered a single stock: Yes
Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) mainly live in the pelagic ecosystem of the entire North Atlantic and its adjacent seas, primarily the Mediterranean Sea. Bluefin tuna has a wide geographical distribution and is one of the only large pelagic fish living permanently in temperate Atlantic waters (Figure 1). Archival tagging and tracking information confirmed that bluefin tuna can sustain cold as well as warm temperatures while maintaining stable internal body temperature. Until recently, it was assumed that bluefin tuna preferentially occupies the surface and subsurface waters of the coastal and open-sea areas, but archival tagging and ultrasonic telemetry data indicate that bluefin tuna frequently dive to depths of 500m to 1,000m. Bluefin tuna is also a highly migratory species that seems to display a homing behavior and spawning site fidelity in both the Mediterranean Sea and Gulf of Mexico, which constitute the two main spawning areas being clearly identified today. Less is known about feeding migrations within the Mediterranean and the North Atlantic, but results from electronic tagging indicated that bluefin tuna movement patterns vary considerably between individuals, years and areas. The appearance and disappearance of important past fisheries further suggest that important changes in the spatial dynamics of bluefin tuna may also have resulted from interactions between biological factors, environmental variations and fishing. Although the Atlantic bluefin tuna population is managed as two stocks, separated by the 45°W meridian, its population structure remains poorly understood and needs to be further investigated. Recent genetic and microchemistry studies as well as work based on historical fisheries tend to indicate that the bluefin tuna population structure is complex.
The information on natal origin derived from otolith microchemistry received by the SCRS indicated that there is an increasing contribution of eastern origin fish to the western fisheries with decreasing average size of the fish in the catch (i.e. up to 62% for fish in the 69-119 cm size class). In contrast, other western fisheries supported by the largest size classes had minimal or no eastern component in the catch. However, there remains considerable uncertainty and therefore additional samples are needed to improve our understanding of the relative contribution of the two populations to the different fisheries over time.
 | Figure1 Distribution of Atlantic bluefin catches by gear for the period 1950-2007.
 |
Exploitation Fishery indicatorsThe total catch for the West Atlantic peaked at nearly 20,000 t in 1964, mostly due to the Japanese longline fishery for large fish off Brazil and the United States purse seine fishery for juvenile fish ( Table1, Figure 2). Catches dropped sharply thereafter with the collapse of the longline fishery off Brazil and decline in purse seine catches, but increased again to average over 5,000 t in the 1970s due to the expansion of the Japanese longline fleet into the northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico and an increase in purse seine effort targeting larger fish for the sashimi market. The total catch for the West Atlantic including discards has generally been relatively stable since 1982 due to the imposition of quotas. However, since a total catch level of 3,319 t in 2002 (the highest since 1981, with all three major fishing nations indicating higher catches), total catch in the West Atlantic has declined steadily reaching 1,624 t in 2007 (Figure 2). This decline is primarily due to considerable reductions in catch levels for United States fisheries. Since 2002, the Canadian annual catches have been relatively stable at about 500-600 t (733 t in 2006); the 2006 catch was the highest recorded since 1977. Japanese catches have generally fluctuated between 300-500 t, with the exception of 2003 (57 t), which was low for regulatory reasons. The overall number of Japanese vessels engaged in bluefin fishing has declined from more than 100 boats in recent years to about 50 boats in 2007, of which about 20 boats operated in the West Atlantic. After reaching 2,014 t in 2002 (the highest level since 1979), the catches (landings and discards) of U.S. vessels fishing in the northwest Atlantic (including the Gulf of Mexico) declined precipitously during 2003-2007. The United States did not catch its quota in 2004-2007 with catches of 1,066, 848, 615, and 849 t, respectively. It was noted that some nations have adopted a fishing year that is different from the calendar year to manage their quota.
 | Figure2 Historical catches of western bluefin tuna: (a) by gear type (LL=longline, TP=trap, PS=purse seine, HL/RR= hand line/rod and reel) and (b) in comparison to TAC levels agreed by the Commission.
 |
Assessment Assessment Model An updated assessment was conducted this year, including information up to 2007. This assessment is consistent with previous analyses in that spawning stock biomass (SSB) declined steadily between the early 1970s and 1992. Since then, SSB has fluctuated between 18% and 27% of the 1975 level (Figure 3). The stock has experienced different levels of fishing mortality (F) over time, depending on the size of fish targeted by various fleets (Figure 3). Fishing mortality on spawners (ages 8 and older) declined markedly between 2002 and 2007.
Estimates of recruitment were very high in the early 1970s (Figure 3), and additional analyses involving longer catch and index series suggest that recruitment was also high during the 1960s. Since 1977, recruitment has varied from year to year without trend. The Committee noted that a key factor in estimating MSY-related benchmarks is the highest level of recruitment that can be achieved in the long term. Assuming that average recruitment cannot reach the high levels from the early 1970s, recent F (2004-2006) is about 30% higher than the MSY level and SSB is about half of the MSY level (Figure ). Estimates of stock status are more pessimistic if a high recruitment scenario is considered (F/FMSY=2.1, B/BMSY=0.14).
One important factor in the recent decline of fishing mortality on large bluefin is that the TAC has not been taken during this time period, due primarily to a shortfall by the United States fisheries that target large bluefin. Two plausible explanations for the shortfall were put forward previously by the Committee: (1) that availability of fish to the United States fishery has been abnormally low, and/or (2) the overall size of the population in the Western Atlantic declined substantially from the level of recent years. While there is no overwhelming evidence to favor either explanation over the other, the base case assessment implicitly favors the first hypothesis (regional changes in availability) because a large recent reduction in SSB is not estimated. Nevertheless, the Committee notes that there remains substantial uncertainty on this issue and more research needs to be done.
The SCRS cautions that the conclusions of this assessment do not capture the full degree of uncertainty in the assessments and projections. An important factor contributing to uncertainty is mixing between fish of eastern and western origin. Limited analyses were conducted of the two stocks with mixing. Depending on the types of data used to estimate mixing (conventional tagging or isotope signature samples) and modeling assumptions made, the estimates of stock status varied considerably. However, these analyses are preliminary and more research needs to be done before mixing models can be used operationally for management advice. Another important source of uncertainty is recruitment, both in terms of recent levels (which are estimated with low precision in the assessment), and potential future levels (the "low" vs "high" recruitment hypotheses which affect management benchmarks). Finally, the growth curve assumed in the analyses may be revised based on new information that is being collected. If the curve changes substantially, it may impact the assessment results as well as management benchmarks.
 | Figure 3 Median estimates of spawning biomass (age 8+), fishing mortality on spawners, apical fishing mortality (F on the most vulnerable age class) and recruitment for the base VPA model. The 80% confidence intervals are indicated with dotted lines.
 |
 | Figure 4 Estimated status of stock relative to the Convention objectives (MSY) by year (1970 to 2007). The lines give the time series of point estimates for each recruitment scenario and the clouds of white symbols depict the corresponding bootstrap estimates of uncertainty for the most recent year.
 |
Overall Assessment Results OutlookA medium-term (12-year) outlook evaluation of changes in spawning stock size and yield over the remaining rebuilding period under various management options was conducted. Future recruitment was assumed to fluctuate around two alternative scenarios: (i) average levels observed for 1976-2004 (70,000 recruits, the low recruitment scenario) and (ii) levels that increase as the stock rebuilds (MSY level of 160,000 recruits, the high recruitment scenario). The Committee has no strong evidence to favor either scenario over the other and notes that both are reasonable (but not extreme) lower and upper bounds on rebuilding potential.
The outlook for bluefin tuna in the West Atlantic with the low recruitment scenario (Figure 5) is similar to that from the 2006 assessment (Anon. 2007a). A total catch of 2,100 t is predicted to have at least a 50% chance of achieving the convention objectives of preventing overfishing and rebuilding the stock to MSY levels by 2019, the target rebuilding time. The outlook under the high recruitment scenario (Figure 5) is more pessimistic since the rebuilding target would be higher; a total catch of less than 1,500 t is predicted to stop overfishing in 2009, but the stock would not be expected to rebuild by 2019 even with no fishing.
Table 2. summarizes the estimated chance that various constant catch policies will allow rebuilding under the high and low recruitment scenarios for the base-case. The low recruitment scenario suggests that catch levels of 2,400 t will have about a 50% chance of rebuilding the stock by 2019 and catches of 2,000 t or lower will have greater than a 75% chance of rebuilding. If the high recruitment scenario is correct, then the western stock will not rebuild by 2019 even with no catch, although catches of 1,500 t or less are expected to immediately end overfishing (50% chance) and initiate rebuilding (
Table 3).
Among the alternative models examined by the Committee, the option that excluded the Canadian Gulf of St. Lawrence index was examined further, due to the considerations of possible resource re-distribution, and the observation that the recent high values were difficult to reconcile with other available fisheries data, and could reflect the impact of a single or a limited number of strong year-classes. The levels of catch that lead to rebuilding with that alternative model are lower; 1,800 t will have about a 50% chance and 1,500 t will have a 75% chance.
The Committee notes that considerable uncertainties remain for the outlook of the western stock, including the effects of mixing and management measures on the eastern stock.
 | Figure 5 Projections of spawning stock biomass (SSB) for the Base Case assessment under low recruitment (top panels) and high recruitment (bottom panels) and various levels of constant catch. The labels “50%” and “75%” refer to the probability that the SSB will be greater than or equal to the values indicated by each curve. Note that curves are arranged sequentially in the same order as the legends. The dashed horizontal lines represent the median (50%) level of SSB at MSY.
 |
Management Considered a management unit: Yes Effects of current regulations
Catches of western bluefin have been below the TAC since 2003, although that was not always the case prior to then (Figure 1). The estimated percentage of fish less than 115cm in the catch has been less than 8% of the TAC from 1992 to 2006, although this percentage increased in 2007 to about 11% of TAC.
The Committee previously noted that Recommendation 06-06 was expected to result in a rebuilding of the stock towards the convention objective, but also noted that there has not yet been enough time to detect with confidence the population response to the measure.
Management Advice In 1998, the Commission initiated a 20-year rebuilding plan designed to achieve Bmsy with at least 50% probability. The current assessment indicates that the stock has not yet rebuilt as projected under the plan initially. The 2007 SSB is estimated to be 7% below the level of the Plan’s first year.
Based on a strict interpretation of the base case projections and the Western Atlantic Rebuilding Plan [Rec. 98-07], the Commission is faced with TAC options that range between 2,400 t and zero depending on its choice of recruitment scenarios and choice of the probability of rebuilding. The Committee notes that making decisions based on the low recruitment scenario when in fact the high recruitment scenario is true, could be riskier in terms of stock rebuilding. In light of the uncertainty about recruitment and other uncertainties not taken into account in the projections, the Committee strongly advises against an increase in TAC. Analyses conducted during the Joint ICCAT-Canada Precautionary workshop as well as two subsequent analyses reviewed by the Committee (SCRS/2008/089, SCRS/2008/175) suggested that the projections made during past assessments were too optimistic. This is reinforced by the observation that, halfway through the rebuilding program, biomass is still below what it was at the beginning. The Committee notes that there is a provision of the rebuilding plan to adopt harvest levels that provides a 50% or greater chance of meeting rebuilding targets. Given this possibility and the lack of progress on rebuilding, the Committee recommends that the Commission adopt more conservative catch levels that will result in a higher probability (for example, 75% chance) that BMSY is achieved by the beginning of 2019. Under the more optimistic "low recruitment" scenario, this target could be achieved with a TAC of 2,000 t. However, if the assessment and estimates of future yield are positively biased or if there is implementation error (both of which have occurred in the past), the TAC should be lower (for instance, based on the assessment results without the Gulf of St. Lawrence CPUE index, the TAC would need to be reduced to less than 1,500 t in order to achieve Bmsy by 2019 with 75% probability).
As noted previously by the Committee, both the productivity of western Atlantic bluefin and western Atlantic bluefin fisheries are linked to the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean stock. Therefore, management actions taken in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean are likely to influence the recovery in the western Atlantic, because even small rates of mixing from East to West can have significant effects on the West due to the fact that Eastern plus Mediterranean resource is much larger than that of the West.
WEST ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA SUMMARY
(Catches and Biomass in t) |
Current (2007) Catch (including discards) |
1,624 t |
Assuming Low Potential Recruitment |
Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY|R1) |
2,852 (2,680-3,032)2 |
Relative Spawning Stock Biomass: |
|
B2007/B1975 |
0.25 (0.16-0.38)2 |
B2007/BMSY|R |
0.57 (0.46-0.70)2 |
Relative Fishing Mortality3: |
|
F2004-2006/FMSY|R |
1.27 (1.04-1.53)2 |
F2004-2006 /F0.1 |
2.23 (1.82-2.72)2 |
F2004-2006 /Fmax |
1.27 (1.04-1.53)2 |
Assuming High Potential Recruitment |
Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) |
6,201 (4,887-9,142)2 |
Relative Spawning Stock Biomass: |
|
B2007/B1975 |
0.25 (0.16-0.38)2 |
B2007/BMSY|R |
0.14 (0.08-0.21)2 |
Relative Fishing Mortality3: |
|
F2004-2006 /FMSY|R |
2.18 (1.74-2.64)2 |
F2004-2006 /F0.1 |
2.23 (1.82-2.72)2 |
F2004-2006 /Fmax |
1.27 (1.04-1.53)2 |
Management Measures:
|
[Rec. 06-06] TAC of 2,100 t which began in 2007, including dead discards |
1 MSY calculated conditional that recruitment remains at recent (1976-2004) levels.
2 Median and approximate 80% confidence interval from bootstrapping from the assessment.
3 2004-2006 refers to the geometric mean of the estimates for 2004-2006 (a proxy for recent F levels).
Biological State and Trend Exploitation rate: F2007/FMSY|R = 0.14 (0.08-0.21) Abundance level: SSB2007/SSBMSY|R = 2.18 (1.74-2.64) The assessment conducted in 2008 is consistent with previous analyses in that spawning stock biomass (SSB) declined steadily between the early 1970s and 1992. Since then, SSB has fluctuated between 18% and 27% of the 1975 level. Fishing mortality on spawners (ages 8 and older) declined markedly between 2002 and 2007. Source of information
Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS) .
“Bluefin, Executive Summary.” Madrid, Spain September 29 - October 3, 2008.
 . |
|
| |
|
|