Fishery Resources Monitoring System

Français
Bigeye tuna - Indian Ocean, 2008
Marine Resource  Fact Sheet
Stock status report 2009
Bigeye tuna - Indian Ocean, 2008
Fact Sheet Citation  
Bigeye tuna Indian Ocean
Owned byIndian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) – More
Related observationsLocate in inventorydisplay tree map
 
Species:
FAO Names :  en - Bigeye tuna, fr - Thon obèse(=Patudo), es - Patudo, ru - Тунец большеглазый
Geographic extent of Bigeye tuna - Indian Ocean
Main Descriptors
Considered a single stock: Yes        Spatial Scale: Regional
 
 
Habitat and Biology
Depth zone: Unspecified.   Horizontal distribution: Oceanic.   Vertical distribution: Pelagic.  


Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) inhabit the tropical and subtropical waters of the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans in waters down to around 300 m. Juveniles frequently school at the surface underneath floating objects with yellowfin and skipjack tunas. Association with floating objects appears less common as bigeye grow older.

The tag recoveries from the RTTP-IO provide evidence of rapid and large scale movements of juvenile bigeye in the Indian Ocean, thus supporting the current assumption of a single stock for the Indian Ocean. The new information on the apparent movements of tagged bigeye is presented in Figure 1. The average minimum distance between juvenile bigeye release and recapture positions is estimated at 525 nautical. miles. The range of the stock (as indicated by the distribution of catches) includes tropical areas, where reproduction occurs, and temperate waters which are believed to be feeding grounds. Of the three tropical tuna species, bigeye tuna lives the longest (probably more than 15 years) and that makes it the species most vulnerable, in relative terms, to over-exploitation. Bigeye have been reported to grow to 200 cm (fork length) long and over 200 kg and start reproducing when they are approximately three years old, at a length of about 100 cm.

The analyses of tag/recovery data from the RTTP-IO widely support the hypothesis of a multi-stanza growth pattern for bigeye tuna, with slow growing juveniles. This pattern is similar to the multi-stanza growth pattern now estimated for yellowfin.
Geographical Distribution
Jurisdictional distribution: Highly migratory

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: Regional

Geo References
Resource Structure
Considered a single stock: Yes


By contrast with yellowfin and skipjack tunas, for which the major catches take place in the western Indian Ocean, bigeye tuna is also exploited in the eastern Indian Ocean (Figures 2). The relative increase in catches in the eastern Indian Ocean in the late 1990’s was mostly due to increased activity of small longliners fishing for fresh tuna. This fleet started operating around 1985. In the western Indian Ocean, the catches of bigeye are mostly the result of the activity of large longliners and purse seiners.
Exploitation
 

Fisheries
Bigeye tuna is mainly caught by industrial fisheries and appears only occasionally in the catches of artisanal fisheries. Total annual catches have increased steadily since the start of the fishery, reaching the 100,000 t level in 1993 and peaking at 150,000 t in 1999. Total annual catches averaged 121,700 t over the period 2004 to 2008. Bigeye tunas have been caught by industrial longline fleets since the early 1950's, but before 1970 they only represented an incidental catch. After 1970, the introduction of fishing practices that improved the access to the bigeye resource and the emergence of a sashimi market made bigeye tuna a target species for the main industrial longline fleets. Total catch of bigeye by longliners in the Indian Ocean increased steadily from the 1950's to reaching 100,000 t in 1993 and around 140,000–150,000 t for a short period from 1997-1999. (Figure 1). The average annual catch by longliners for the period from 2004 to 2008 was 94,400t. Taiwan,China is the major longline fleet fishing for bigeye and it currently takes just under 50% of the total catch. Large bigeye tuna (averaging just above 40 kg) are primarily caught by longlines, and in particular deep longliners. Since the early 1990’s, bigeye tuna has been caught by purse seine vessels fishing on tunas aggregated on floating objects. Total catch of bigeye by purse seiners in the Indian Ocean reached 40,700 t in 1999, but the average annual catch for the period from 2004 to 2008 was 25,300 t. Forty to sixty boats have operated in this fishery since 1984. Purse seiners mainly take small juvenile bigeye (averaging around 5 kg) whereas longliners much larger and heavier fish, and while purse seiners take much lower tonnages of bigeye compared to longliners , they take larger numbers of individual fish.


Figure 1 Yearly catches (thousand of metric tonnes) of bigeye tuna by gear from 1959 to 2008. Data as of October 2009.


Figure 2 Average annual bigeye catches by gear during the periods 1990-1999 and 2000-2008. LL = longline, PS = purse seine, SU = pole and line. Data as of October 2009.
Assessment
 
Assessment Model

In 2009, four stock assessment models were applied to the Indian Ocean bigeye tuna stock using an agreed list of input parameters.
Overall Assessment Results

From the range of MSY estimates, the SC chose the value of 110,000 t. This was the MSY estimated by the ASPM and it was reported ahead of the estimates from the other methods because ASPM results have been reported in previous executive summaries; and the WPTT noted that several of the other assessment approaches used in 2009 needed further exploration and development. Given that the mean annual catch for the period 2003-2008 was 123,000 t, it appears that the stock is being exploited at around its maximum level. Results from the ASPIC analysis plotting the annual catches as a function of fishing mortality illustrate the MSY and its uncertainty. Despite the broad agreement of the models in estimating MSY, they produced quite different estimates of absolute levels of virgin and current biomass, and thus in the ratios of current levels of F and SSB to MSY. This was probably due to how the variations in CPUE were interpreted by each model. While acknowledging the value of assessing the status of bigeye from a wide range of modelling perspectives, the WPTT recommended that the results of the ASPM would be used in the Bigeye Executive Summary in 2009. The ASPM results indicate that the 2008 catch is close to the MSY. Furthermore, spawning stock biomass appears to be above the level that would produce MSY, and the fishing mortality in 2008 appears to below the MSY level. Biomass trajectories indicate that the spawning stock biomass is currently just above the MSY level, but it has been declining since the late 1970’s. Similarly, the current fishing mortality is estimated be to just above the MSY level, but fishing mortality has been increasing steadily since the 1980’s.

Despite the progress made in the 2009 assessments, uncertainties in the results and projections still exist. These uncertainties relate to:

  • Uncertainties concerning the available indices of abundance.
  • How well the model structures used in the assessments approximate the true dynamics of the population, and about the quality of the estimation of some of the model key parameters.
  • Insufficient size information for the catches of longline fisheries, especially in recent years.
  • Uncertainties associated with estimating catch-at-size and catch-at-age.
  • Uncertainty about the natural mortality at various life stages, including uncertainty about the functional form of its dependency with age.


Uncertainty about the changes in catchability of the different fisheries involved, especially in the purse-seine fishery. Future consideration of an increase in efficiency could result in a more pessimistic appraisal of the stock status. For example, it is possible that the fishing mortality that would result in the MSY has already been

Notes about exploitation patterns

The exploitation patterns observed in 2003 and 2004 could be considered anomalous, and heavily influenced by the high abundances of yellowfin tuna, which concentrated the activity of the surface fleets. The decrease in the fishing pressure on bigeye currently observed is likely to be temporal, as the fleets appeared to come back to their previous pattern of activity by the second half of 2006.

Two other factors could also influence the short term evolution of the fishery. Rising fuel costs appear to be having an effect on the operating procedures of the surface fleets. Distances travelled at night, and consequently the number of FADs visited, are being reduced to save on fuel costs. The effect of this change could be however reduced by the increasing use of supply vessels, tasked with visiting FADs and informing purse seiners of the abundance of fish around them. The second factor is the limitation on the activity of all fishing fleets on the coast and EEZ of Somalia, due to the increase in the activity of pirates in the area. Some purse seine fleets have received indications from their governments not to venture into those waters. An important fishery on FADs has traditionally taken place in this area on the last quarter of the year, with significant catches of juvenile bigeye. Because of piracy acts off Somalia, the fishery has shifted into the South of the Arabian Sea, north of 10°N – an area where there are relatively few bigeye and where juvenile bigeye is not taken at FADs.

Another factor to consider when analysing the possible futures trends in SSB is the increasing trend in effective fishing power observed in the fleets.

Current status

The results of the stock assessments conducted in 2009 were broadly similar to previous work. The preliminary estimate of catches in 2008 (107,000 t) is below the current estimate of MSY (110,000 t), catches in the past (1997-1999) have significantly exceeded MSY. Estimated values of fishing mortality and SSB for 2008 are also close to MSY-related values, indicating a fully exploited stock.

Outlook

Recent changes in the areas fished by purse seiners do not appear to have had an effect on mortality for juvenile bigeye, despite the decrease in effort in the Somali basin where fishing on FADs usually caught the majority of juvenile bigeye.
Scientific Advice

The indices of abundance from two longline fleets available for this stock present divergent trends over the last few years, the differences observed in targeting are not fully explained.

The SC recommended that catches of bigeye tuna should not exceed the estimated MSY of 110,000t.
Biological State and Trend
 Exploitation state: Fully exploitedExploitation rate: High fishing mortality
Abundance level: Intermediate abundance, Close to overfished

Stock size and fishing pressure are considered to be close to their value at MSY.
Source of information
 
IOTC-CTOI . Indian Ocean Tuna Commission - Commission des Thons de l'Océan Indien. 2009 Click to openhttp://www.iotc.org/files/proceedings/2009/sc/IOTC-2009-SC-R%5BE%5D.pdf
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2013
Powered by FIGIS
crawl