Northeast Atlantic Deep-sea species fisheries, 2009|
| | | Northeast Atlantic Deep-sea species fisheries, 2009 |
| | Data Ownership | | This document provided, maintained and owned by North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) , is part of NEAFC Fishery Management Reports data collection. |
| more>> <<less Overview: The need to conserve vulnerable deep-sea habitats and species has been high on the NEAFC agenda in recent years. During this period NEAFC has requested scientific information and advice on vulnerable deep-sea habitats. This has not been available in a number of instances, pending more research. It is well known that the current science surrounding temperate area closures is uncertain. Consequently NEAFC has moved forward in a precautionary and adaptive manner.
In 2006 NEAFC decided to set up procedures for reporting scientific information on deep-sea fisheries to ICES and has a standing request to ICES for more detailed advice on vulnerable habitats and deep-sea fisheries as more information becomes available. Some deep-water fisheries were regulated by unilateral or internationally agreed TACs in 2003. In 2003 and 2004 Contracting Parties also agreed to freeze effort in the NEAFC Regulatory Area and then reduce it by 30% for 2005 and 2006 and 35 % in 2006. There are no long term management objectives, nor are there any long term management plans in place as the definition of stocks and their status is uncertain.
From 2006 NEAFC has banned all fishery with gillnets in the Regulatory Area below 200 m. This probably stopped gillnet fisheries in the Hatton – Rockall Bank in deep water for sharks, deep water crabs and, on the upper slopes, for monkfish and ling, at its peak employing 50 fishing vessels.1
Information on recent deep-sea fishing activity has been made available through ICES. It should be noted that the term ‘deep-sea fisheries’ covers a heterogeneous group of fishing, fleets, species and areas. NEAFC adopts management measures and allocations for the whole distribution area of the stock for areas inside and beyond the jurisdiction of Contracting Parties.
1- 2004, Deepnet project report: A preliminary Investigation on Shelf Edge and Deepwater Fixed Net Fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank by Nils-Roar Hareide, Maurice Clark, Paul Connolly, Dominic Rihan, Peter Tyndall, Myles Mulligan, Robert Misund, Dag Furevik, Odd Børre Humborstad5 Philip McMullen, Kjartan Hoydal, Tom Blasdale, Andrew Newton.
|
| Harvested Resource Type of production system: Industrial Captured Species Regulated resources under NEAFC scheme: Apristuris spp Fishery Area Climatic zone: Temperate; Polar. Depth zone: Slope (200 m - 1000 m). Horizontal distribution: Oceanic. Vertical distribution: Demersal/Benthic. Geo References for: North East Atlantic  North East Atlantic
| RFB competence | NEAFC - NEAFC area of competence |
More Geo References The following area codes have been found as intersecting the location of Northeast Atlantic Deep-sea species fisheries| FAO Major Fishing Areas | 21 - Atlantic, Northwest | | 27 - Atlantic, Northeast | | Large Marine Ecosystem Areas (LME) | 19 - East Greenland Shelf | | 20 - Barents Sea | | 22 - North Sea | | 24 - Celtic-Biscay Shelf | | 25 - Iberian Coastal | | 59 - East Greenland Shelf/Sea | | 60 - Faroe Plateau | | 64 - Arctic Ocean | | 65 - Arctic Archipelago |
 | A tentative illustration of deep-sea fisheries on the slopes and seamounts in the NEAFC Regulatory Area (2001 NEAFC Annual Meeting summary: NAFO/ICES/SCIRO Symposium on Deep-sea Fisheries, 12-14 September 2001, Varadero Cuba)  | Fleet segment
Fleets involved: Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Russian Federation, Scotland.
Fishing Gear Fishing gear used in deep-sea fisheries (bottom trawl, longline and gillnet) does have bottom contact. Bottom trawlsLonglines (not specified)Gillnets (not specified)Métiers operated
FAO “Worldwide review of bottom fisheries in the high seas”.
 | | Estimated number of vessels in recent years by fishery or fishing area |
Seasonality There is currently no information on seasonality. Catch Analysis of catches of deep-sea species reported to NEAFC under the Scheme of Control and Enforcement shows the following patterns. The species reported have been categorised according to their productivity adapted from the Annex II and III in the FAO report from the Expert Consultation on Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas in Bangkok 21-23 November 2006 (FAO Fisheries Report No. 838 FIEP/R838). Catch By-catch In deep-sea fisheries, by-catches of species not targetted or of no commercial interest are known to occur. Ecosystem Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF FISHERIESThere is no scientific specific advice on the environmental impacts of fisheries in the high seas (NEAFC Regulatory Area) or the North East Atlantic Ocean.
In a response to OSPAR, ICES informs that the effects of fishing in OSPAR Region V (North East Atlantic Ocean) are relatively poorly studied. A number of the deep-water biogenic habitats in the Area are very susceptible to damage from seabed fisheries, particularly trawling, but also to the intense or prolonged use of other gears. Damage has been documented at a number of locations, but there is very likely to have been more damage than that documented.
Fisheries managers have introduced closed areas to protect some of these habitats. Bycatch of birds, marine mammals, and sharks occurs, and in the case of sharks this is probably affecting stocks in an unsustainable manner.
Further scientific surveys are required to identify habitats of particular importance, along with fisheries closures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. Bycatch can be reduced using technical measures, but these require dedicated development, usually best undertaken in association with relevant fishers ( ICES Advice 2008. Book 1).
It is therefore not possible to assess the effects of NEAFC measures and area management, measures reducing allowable effort and banning certain gears. IMPACT OF CATCHESMost deep-sea stocks are data poor and there is scant possibility in the short and medium term to undertake analytical assessments. ICES has in some instances recommended closures of fisheries and in other reduction in effort. The state of exploitation of most species/stocks cannot be assessed with respect to standard criteria. It should be noted that NEAFC defines deep sea fisheries by a species list where ICES uses depth criteria. The following is a summary of the 2008 assessment of ICES: In 2008, WGDEEP assessed the status of deepwater fish stocks in the ICES area (covers the NEAFC Convention Area) and gave advice on their management. Exploratory assessments were carried out for a number of stocks (roundnose grenadier in the Celtic Sea, ling in the Faroes and red sea bream in sub-area IX) but, for most stocks, trends in abundance indicators were used as the basis for assessment. Resources Assessed Black scabbard fish (Aphanopus carbo)In the absence of clear evidence on stock discrimination two units have been considered: northern (Subareas V, VI, VII, and XII) and southern (Subareas VIII and IX).
In the northern area, the state of stock remains uncertain but the available CPUE data indicate a decline in abundance since 1990. Longline cpue in Division IXa has been relatively stable during the past decade.
Assessment results provided by ICES: Black Scabbardfish - Northeast AtlanticGreater silver smelt (Argentina silus)There is insufficient information on which to determine the state of argentine abundance in either of the two areas considered by WGDEEP, subdivision Va and other areas (I, II, IIIa, IV, Vb, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII, and XIV). Catches increased considerably in recent years, but were reduced in 2003 in some areas, partly due to introduction of TAC management in EU waters. In Sub-area VI the frequency of old fish (20+) in the catches declined significantly after a few years of target fisheries. Such changes suggest high exploitation rates. Assessment results provided by ICES: Greater silver smelt or argentine - Northeast AtlanticAlfonsino (Beryx spp.) The stock structure of the alfonsinos is unknown and possible fish movements between areas, (seamounts, coastal areas of the islands and slope continental areas) are also not known. However these species are known to aggregate around the seamounts areas. Areas, north and south of the Azores EEZ are highly exploited with a regime of operation that suggests a sequential depletion of the explored seamounts. Standardized cpue from the Azores longline commercial fishery indicates an overall slowly decreasing trend for Beryx decadactylus. Assessment results provided by ICES: Alfonsino - Northeast AtlanticTusk (Brosme brosme)Based on the recommendations of WGDEEP in 2007, tusk is now assessed under five new stock units; Arctic (sub areas I and II), Iceland (Va and XIV), the Mid Atlantic Ridge (XIIa1), Rockall (VIb), and a combined unit for other areas (IIIa, IVa, Vb, VI, VII, VIII, IX, XII, and XIV).
In all these areas, the state of the stocks remains uncertain. In the Arctic, CPUE has in recent years been well below historical levels. In Iceland, survey indices show that abundance has been increasing in recent years, although it is still lower than in the mid-1980s. On the Mid-Atlantic ridge catches of tusk are very minor and there is insufficient information on which to assess the state of the stocks. At Rockall, CPUE indices show no apparent trend. In other areas, the cpue series of the main fleet in Divisions IVa, VIa, and VIb suggest that the abundance has remained at a reduced level.
Assessment results provided by ICES: Tusk - Northeast AtlanticTusk - Barents Sea, Norwegian Sea, Spitzbergen and Bear IslandTusk - Iceland and Reykjanes RidgeTusk - Mid-Atlantic RidgeTusk - RockallTusk - Other areas of Northeast AtlanticRoundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris)The drastic increase in exploitation of roundnose grenadier in Division IIIa the years 2003-2005 gave rise for serious concern, even if no clear signs of the increasing fishing pressure were observed in recent years. No directed fishery has taken place since 2007, due to retirement of the fishers. A decrease in mean length of the in the catch from 1987 to 2004 &2005 indicates heavy exploitation on this stock.
The stock status in Vb, VI, VII and XIIb is uncertain but there are some evidences of biomass depletion. The apparent decline in CPUE in the reference area appears inconsistent with the presence of older fish in the current landings. However, this fishery in Vb, VI, VII and XIIb has expanded spatially with time and it is possible that sequential depletion of components of the stock may be occurring. Little is known about migration or mixing within the stock.
The state of the stock on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is uncertain. Soviet data suggest a high stock biomass (400,000-700,000 t) in 1970-1980s but a decreasing trend of the CPUE indicate that the abundance was reduced to a low level in recent years. Moreover, Russian trawl acoustic survey in 2003 showed relatively low biomass of the pelagic component of stock, an increasing depth of the aggregations, and a higher number of small immature fish.
Assessment results provided by ICES: Roundnose grenadier - Northeast AtlanticRoundnose grenadier - Mid-Atlantic RidgeRoundnose grenadier - Other areas of Northeast AtlanticRoundnose grenadier - Rockall, West of Scotland, Irish and Celtic seas, Porcupine Bank, English and Bristol Channels, Faroes grounds and Western Hatton BankRoundnose grenadier - Skagerrak and KattegatKitefin shark (Dalatias licha)Kitefin shark - Northeast AtlanticOrange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus)In Subarea VI orange roughy catches increased rapidly in the in the late 1980s and subsequently dropped to a low level. It is presumed that the aggregations were fished out. Orange roughy fisheries in Subarea VII have exhibited a similar pattern to that in VI. High catches have not been sustained by individual fleets and have dropped to low levels, suggesting sequential depletion. It is not clear if there are unfished aggregations remaining in Subarea VII. Overall, landings have declined to very low levels in each management area (VI, VII and other). Assessment results provided by ICES: Orange roughy - Northeast AtlanticBlue ling (Molva dypterygia)Based on cpue from Iceland trawlers the abundance of blue ling in Va and XIV has steadily declined from 1991 to 2000 and has remained at a low level since then. In Vb, VI, and VII CPUE information suggests that the abundance of blue ling remains at a low level. In other areas (Subdivisions I, II, IIIa, IVa, VIII, IX, and XII) Trends in landings suggest serious stock depletion, at least in Subareas IIa and IIb. Assessment results provided by ICES: Blue Ling - Northeast AtlanticLing (Molva molva)Commercial cpue for Norwegian longliners in sub-areas I and II has in recent years been lower than observed in the 1970s and 80s. There is some evidence of a recent increase but not to previous levels. In division Va, survey biomass index shows increasing abundance since 2000. The levels are currently at a similar high level as in the start of the series and there are indications that fishing mortality may have declined in recent years. In division Vb, abundance indices suggest that the stock is stable at a low level compared with the 1970s and 80s. Catch curve analysis indicates that total mortality on fish 7 years and older is at 0.5. The cpue series of the main fleet in Divisions IVa, VIa, and VIb suggest that the abundance has remained at a reduced level after the decline in the 1970s to 1990s. Assessment results provided by ICES: Ling - Northeast AtlanticRed (blackspot) seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)Available information, particularly genetics and tagging, seems to support the current assumption of three assessment units (VI – VIII, IX and X).
Based on historical catches, the stock in VI, VII, and VIII appears to be severely depleted. The stock in sub-area IX is depleted and there is no evidence of a significant recovery of the stock resulting from the local recovery plan. The status in Subarea X is uncertain but there are signs of increases in indices of abundance from surveys and stable CPUE from the fishery. It is possible that sequential depletion of local populations may be occurring and this may be contributing to the stability of observed commercial CPUE series. Assessment results provided by ICES: Red Seabream - Northeast AtlanticGreater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides)There is no information available that allows for evaluation of the stock trends. The state of the stock is unknown. Assessment results provided by ICES: Greater forkbeard - Northeast AtlanticGreenland halibut (Rheinhardtius hippoglossoides)Greenland halibut - Barents and Norwegian SeasGreenland halibut - Denmark Strait Management Management unit: Yes The fishery is regulated under NEAFC jurisdictional framework / management regime. History Some deep-water fisheries were regulated by unilateral or internationally agreed TACs in 2003. In 2003 and 2004 Contracting Parties also agreed to freeze effort in the NEAFC Regulatory Area and then reduce it by 30% for 2005 and 2006. Jurisdictional framework Mandate: Management; Monitoring; Control and surveillance. Area of Competence: NEAFC area of competence Maritime Area: High seas. The NEAFC Regulatory Area is the areas beyond national jurisdiction in the NEAFC Convention Area.  | NEAFC Regulatory Area. Based on NEAFC VMS database. This maps shows positions of all fishing vessels in the NEAFC Regulatory Area irrespective of fishery and gear type. Prepared by Dr Jason Hall-Spencer.  |
Management system This fishery is managed as part of the management system described in Northeast Atlantic NEAFC high seas fisheries. Status of Management Management Resolutions These resolutions took into consideration the resource assessments provided by ICES, as presented in the Ecosystem assessment section In 2005 NEAFC Contracting Parties reported as follows (NEAFC Deep-sea Working Group 27-28 April 2005)
| Contracting Party |
Implementation Method
|
Reference period for effort limit |
Definition of authorisation |
Measure of reduction in effort |
|
The EU
Estonia
Poland
|
Limit on fleet capacity and effort, kilo-watt days, in Convention Area. TACs for main commercial species. |
1998-2000; vessels having caught over 10t/year for old member states. 2000-2002 for new member states |
Any vessel with more than 100Kg of deep-sea species on board |
10 % reduction compared with 2003 in kilowatt days for vessels licensed to deep-sea fishing, no increase in the number of vessels and aggregate power and volume compared to 1998-2000. 2000-2002 for new member states |
| Denmark (in respect of the Faroe Islands) |
Limit on fleet size |
1995-2000 under consideration |
The number of vessels are permitted to fish for deep-sea species frozen at 1995 level. |
In one month the basic effort data from logbook data will have been processed and will form the basis for reducing effort 30 %. The reference period will stretch back to the mid 1990s. A level of 300 fishing days for 2005 is indicated. |
| Denmark (in respect of Greenland) |
Not presently fishing in the NRA |
No track record |
N/A |
The lack of track record should not exclude vessels from participating in this fisheries in the future |
| Iceland |
TACs for main commercial species |
1999-2000 under consideration |
National system of authorisation
|
As of April no application for licence for the year 2005 has been received |
| Norway |
Days-at-sea for a limited fleet in the NRA |
1998-2002; vessels having caught over 5t/year (RP). |
A licence system allowing vessels to catch any quantity of deep-sea species listed in Annex 1B of the Scheme |
Fishing days for 17 Norwegian long line vessels allowed to fish for deep-sea species had been reduced by 30 % to 547 fishing days in 2005 |
| Russian Federation |
Days-at-sea for a limited fleet in the NRA |
1970-2003 |
A licence system allowing vessels to catch any quantity of deep-sea species listed in Annex 1B of the Scheme |
30 % reduction in directed effort of the highest level in the reference period leading to 641 fishing day for roundnose grenadier, 67 for alfonsinos and 175 for blue ling in 2005 |
In 2009, NEAFC decided to close 330,000 square kilometres to fisheries with gear that is likely to contact the seafloor during the normal course of fishing on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (see Map A) to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. In addition, fisheries using gillnets, entangling nets and trammel nets are prohibited below 200 meters.
A further spatially important aspect of bottom fishing regulations in NEAFC is the distinction between new and existing fishing areas. NEAFC recently analysed the extent of its closed areas in relation to fishable areas in its regulatory area and arrived at the rough estimates listed below in Table 1 and 2 (for further information please contact the NEAFC Secretariat).
More detailed information is available on the NEAFC website. North East Atlantic Fisheries CommissionTable 1 - Percentage of fishing areas and closures by type and location in NEAFC
|
Area of NEAFC Reg. Area
|
Effective Fishing Existing Area
|
New Fishing Area
|
Closures
|
|
square km
|
sq km %
|
sq km %
|
sq km %
|
|
South of Iceland
|
4 900 000
|
42 500
|
0.9
|
4 502 200
|
91.9
|
355 300
|
7.3
|
|
Norwegian Sea
|
326 000
|
|
|
326 000
|
100
|
|
|
|
Barents Sea
|
71 000
|
71 000
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Ocean
|
275 000
|
|
|
275 000
|
100
|
|
|
Table 2 - Total percentage of fishable areas and closures in NEAFC
|
Fishable Area and Closures
|
|
|
square km
|
%
|
|
Fishable Area South of Iceland
|
655 000
|
|
|
All closures
|
355 300
|
54
|
 | | Map A - Closed areas on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge |
Management Regime Management Objectives There are no long term management objectives, nor are there any long term management plans in place. Management Methods CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
- BINDING
- Effort control: Effort has to be reduced at least 35 % relative to a reference period some years ago. It is not expected that fishing mortality on individual stocks can be controlled by TACs.
- Ban of gillnets: From 2006 NEAFC has banned all fishery with gillnets in the Regulatory Area below 200 m. This probably stopped gillnet fisheries in the Hatton – Rockall Bank in deep water for sharks, deep water crabs and, on the upper slopes, for monkfish and ling, at its peak employing 50 fishing vessels.
[2004, Deepnet project report: A preliminary Investigation on Shelf Edge and Deepwater Fixed Net Fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank by Nils-Roar Hareide, Maurice Clark, Paul Connolly, Dominic Rihan, Peter Tyndall, Myles Mulligan, Robert Misund, Dag Furevik, Odd Børre Humborstad, Philip McMullen, Kjartan Hoydal, Tom Blasdale, Andrew Newton.]
- Area closure: The NEAFC Regulatory Area includes area closures to bottom trawling and other static gears. On Hatton and Rockall Banks, six areas are closed to bottom fishing to protect juvenile fish and coldwater corals (see Map B).
The amendments to the NEAFC Convention and the London Declaration in 2006 created the formal basis for taking action, but already in 2002 NEAFC closed an area in the Rockall Area to protect juvenile fish and in 2004 NEAFC adopted an interim ban on bottom fishing in a large area on the Reykjanes Ridge (the northern part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge) and four seamounts adjacent to the Ridge. In 2007 NEAFC closed five areas in the Rockall – Hatton Bank area to bottom fishing to protect deep-water corals. These closures will be reviewed not later than November 2009. The NEAFC Permanent Committee on Management and Science, PECMAS, has adopted procedures to consider proposals for area closures. An important element is the scientific evaluation of proposals by NEAFC’s provider of scientific advice, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, ICES.
 | | Map B - Closed areas on Hatton and Rockall Banks | COMPLIANCE MEASURES Negotiation Process Coastal States - NEAFC |
|
|