World Global Tuna Fisheries, 2004|
| | | World Global Tuna Fisheries, 2004 |
| | Owned by | Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) more>> |
|
| Location of World Global Tuna Fisheries
Map tips
- Click on
to turn layers on and off
- Double-click to zoom in
- Drag to pan
- Hold down the shift key and drag to zoom to a particular region
Geographic reference: World Spatial Scale: GlobalGlobal
| Approach: Fishery Resource Harvested ResourceFishery Area: Atlantic, Northwest; Atlantic, Northeast; Atlantic, Western …; Atlantic, Eastern …; more>> Target Species: Albacore; Bigeye tuna; null … more>> Fishery IndicatorsCatch |
|
| History Fisheries: Development and expansion
Tuna fisheries are among the oldest in the world with Phoenician trap fisheries
(Ravier and Fromentin, 2001) for bluefin tuna occurring around 2000 BC. They
are mentioned by Aristotle, Oppian and Pliny the Elder, and they are also recorded
in excavations at prehistoric sites.
Until the second part of the twentieth century, fishing occurred mostly in
coastal areas. In the Atlantic, it included purse seining for bluefin tuna off Norway;
trolling for albacore in the Bay of Biscay; trap fishing near the Strait of Gibraltar
and North African coast; swordfish fishing in the northwestern Atlantic and in the
Mediterranean Sea; bigeye and skipjack fishing near islands; and artisanal fishing
along the African coasts. In the Pacific, various artisanal fisheries operated near
islands in tropical waters (albacore trolling off the West Coast of the United States
of America, baitboat fishing for yellowfin and skipjack off the American coast,
pole and line fishing for skipjack near Japan and many other fisheries for various
tunas along the Japanese coasts). Off South America, coastal fisheries operated
using baitboats and small seines. In the Indian Ocean, skipjack fishing off Sri
Lanka, India and Maldives was carried out. Off Australia, longline fishing was
carried out for southern bluefin tuna. Many other artisanal fisheries for tuna-like
fishes existed in tropical or subtropical areas all over the world.
As a result of increasing demand for canned tuna, industrialized fisheries
started during the 1940s and 1950s. They included Japanese longline and baitboat
fishing in the Pacific and baitboat fishing off California along the Mexican coasts
to Central America, while traditional fisheries continued their activities. After the
Second World War, the fishing areas for the Japanese tuna fishery were limited to
its coast until 1952. However, since then, fishing areas, particularly the longline
ones, have expanded very rapidly. In the late 1950s, they reached as far as the
Atlantic Ocean. Also in the late 1950s, some European pole and line fishing started
off the African coasts from local harbours.
In the 1960s, Spanish and French boats with pole and line and purse seines
started tuna fishing off West Africa. Japanese longliners also expanded their fishing
area all over the world, mostly catching albacore and yellowfin for canning. In the
middle of the 1960s, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China started
large-scale longline fishing to export tuna for canning, learning the techniques
from Japan. At the end of this decade, the Japanese longline industry developed
an extremely cold storage system used for new frozen products for the sashimi
market. Consequently, Japan switched the target species from yellowfin and
albacore to bluefin and bigeye. The United States of America’s pole and line fishing off Central and South America was almost completely replaced by purse
seiners in the 1960s and purse seining of tuna with dolphins was developed.
In the 1970s, the purse seine fisheries of European countries developed quickly
in the east tropical Atlantic and attained the first peak of their catches of yellowfin
and skipjack. Purse seine fisheries developed further in the eastern tropical
Pacific. A strict regulation for the reduction of mortality of dolphins caught
with tuna fishing was implemented in this area. Consequently, the United States
of America’s flag vessels started changing their flags to other Central and South
American countries. Some fishing effort was also shifted to the central and western
Pacific where no dolphin fishing occurred.
After the development of extremely cold storage, some longliners gradually
changed their target from yellowfin (for canning) to bigeye (for sashimi). This
shift was first seen among Japanese longliners, but it gradually expanded to the
fleets from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China. To catch bigeye,
which has a much deeper habitat than that of tropical tunas, longlines were set
deeper and deeper. This change in fishing strategy implies changes in fishing areas,
leading to modifications in target and bycatch species.
In the 1980s, a new purse seine fishery started in the western Indian Ocean
and many French seiners from the eastern Atlantic moved there. In the Pacific
Ocean, the purse seine fishery expanded its fishing area, particularly in the south,
central and western Pacific. Purse seine fishing efficiency increased with modern
equipment such as bird radar and the use of helicopters. During the 1990s, many
new countries entered into large-scale industrial fishing, mostly purse seining (e.g.
Mexico, Venezuela and Brazil). Small-scale longline fishing operations by coastal
countries in various areas (e.g. Mediterranean countries, the Philippines and
Indonesia) also started. The Japanese longline fleet began to reduce its size in the
1980s. At the same time, Taiwan Province of China longliners and others flying
flags of convenience increased rapidly.
Particularly in the 1980s, management regulatory measures for tuna fisheries
were introduced by tuna fishery bodies, which also affected fishing patterns
and country shares of catches. In the 1990s, more management measures were
introduced, resulting in an increase in illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU)
fishing. IUU fishing became a hazard for the proper management of fish resources.
In general, the tuna fishing capacity increased extensively during the 1990s. Recent
increases in catches sometimes caused oversupply to the market, particularly for
skipjack because of the large purse seine catches.
Starting in the 1980s and increasingly in the 1990s, many coastal states started
new tuna fishing by chartering boats with flags of convenience. This occurred in
all oceans. Some of these chartered vessels changed flags to the coastal states and
this tendency will possibly be intensified in the near future. Partially because of
the development of these new coastal fisheries, the fishing effort by traditional
longline countries started to decline.
Purse seiners started fishing around FADs in the Atlantic in the early 1990s,
and this method expanded to the Indian and Pacific Oceans. FAD fishing is less selective for fish species and size. The fishing efficiency, size of fish taken, species
composition and incidental catch changed drastically with the adoption of this
new practice..
Tuna farming started in the 1990s. This new industry resulted in a better price
being paid to fishers and an increasing demand for specific sizes and species.
Through the farming/fattening process, the relatively small tunas taken by
purse seiners, which used to be sold only for canning, can now be used for the
sashimi market. To date, bluefin tuna is the main species used in farming, but it is
extending to bigeye and yellowfin tuna. The countries involved in bluefin farming
include Australia, Japan, Mexico and several Mediterranean countries (particularly
Croatia, Italy, Malta, Morocco, Spain and Turkey).
At present, on an industrial scale, tuna and tuna-like species are mainly caught
with purse seines, longline and pole and line over wide areas in oceans (Figures 1
and 2). Of these fishing gears, the most catch in terms of weight is taken by purse
seiners. In the Pacific, about 70 percent of the catch of principal market tunas is
taken by purse seiners, 10 percent by pole and line and 8 percent by longlines.
In the Indian Ocean, these values are 45, 15 and 20 percent and in the Atlantic,
55, 21 and 22 percent, respectively. Other gears used are troll lines, handlines,
driftnets, traps and harpoons.
Industrial tuna fisheries are extremely dynamic and fleets, especially distantwater
fishing fleets, can react very quickly to changes in stock size or market
conditions. For example, as already mentioned, in the early 1980s, because of
low catch rates and problems with access to fishing grounds, many French and
Spanish purse seiners from the Atlantic moved to the Indian Ocean, contributing
to the doubling of Indian Ocean catches. Some of these vessels have now moved
back to the Atlantic. Similarly, because of unfavourable oceanographic conditions
(El Niño), the United States of America’s purse seiners moved from the eastern
Pacific to the western part of the ocean in the early 1980s.
The purse seine and pole and line are used to catch fish close to the surface
(e.g. skipjack and relatively small individuals of yellowfin, albacore and bluefin).
Longlines are used for fish at greater depths (e.g. large individuals of bluefin,
bigeye, yellowfin, albacore and billfishes). Most purse seine and pole and line
catches are canned. Longline catches with the exception of those of albacore are
mainly sold on the sashimi market to be consumed raw, traditionally in Japan, but
now also in other countries. The use of pole and line and large-scale longlining
has been generally declining, while purse seining is increasingly used, resulting in
greater catches of skipjack, small to medium yellowfin and small bigeye, while
catches of large yellowfin and the other principal market tunas have remained
relatively stable.
Small-scale longlining for high-quality fish for the sashimi market is
increasingly being used by Taiwan Province of China and mainland China as
well as other developing countries. This contributes to a general trend of rapidly
increasing importance of coastal developing countries (including island countries
of the Indian and Pacific Oceans) in tuna fishing. This increasing importance results from the purchase of purse seiners and from the intensification of artisanal
fisheries. Catches from these fisheries may still be underestimated despite the
fact that the rate of non-reporting of catches in developing countries is being
reduced.
Further information on tuna fisheries can be found in Bayliff,
Leiva Moreno and Majkowski (2005) and in Miyake, Miyabe and Nakano
(2004). For each stock of principal market tunas, a list of the most important
fishing countries can be found in
Table 1 - Catches of principal market tunas in 2004 by stock, fishing gear and country (tonnes) Harvested Resource Target Species Main target species Catch With the exception of the last part, this factsheet concentrates on principal market
tunas (see the list of Target species). The relationship between catches of these species and those of all tuna
and tuna-like species is presented in Figure 1. The latter catches tend to increase
continuously with some fluctuations, reaching their maximum of about 9.5 million
tonnes in 2003.
 | Figure 1 Annual catches of all tuna and tuna-like species, principal tunas, skipjack and yellowfin ('000 tonnes)  |
 | Figure 2 Annual catches of principal tunas other than skipjack and yellowfin ('000 tonnes)  |
History
PRINCIPAL MARKET TUNAS
Historical evolutionThe global production of the principal market tunas increased relatively steadily
from less than 0.2 million tonnes in the early 1950s to a peak of 4.3 million tonnes
in 2003, declining slightly in 2004 (Figure 1). In the early 1950s, most catch (about
80 percent) was taken in the Pacific. Between 1970 and 1978, catches increased
significantly as a result of the expansion of fisheries in the eastern Atlantic and
the development of new offshore fishing grounds in the eastern Pacific. Between
1978 and 1984, many vessels moved to the western Pacific and the western Indian
Ocean, developing new fisheries there. In the mid-1980s, catches of the principal tunas increased to 2.4 million tonnes. By 1994, they had increased to 3.4 million
tonnes with better oceanographic conditions after the transfer of vessels. The
development of FAD fishing also contributed to these increases.
By species
Skipjack, which is used mostly for canning, accounts for the greatest proportion
of the world catches of tuna (Figure 1). Catches tended to increase over the entire
period of its exploitation. In 2003, the skipjack catch was about 2.2 million tonnes
(the highest on record), representing about half of all the principal market tuna
landed. In the early 1980s, catches of skipjack increased steadily as a result of
expansion of fishing effort into the tropical western and central Pacific (Figure 3)
and the western Indian Ocean (Figure 4). These increases continued in the
following years. The development of purse seine fisheries on FADs in the 1990s
contributed to further increases in catches of tropical tuna species including
skipjack. In the Atlantic, catches of skipjack peaked at 0.24 million tonnes in
1991, decreasing to 0.19 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 5) and thus contributing
relatively little to the global catches of the species.
Yellowfin is commercially the second most important species of tuna by
weight. Most yellowfin is used for canning, but more and more of the catches are
being sold in fresh fish markets (and also as frozen fish). Similarly as with skipjack, for the same reasons, catches of yellowfin have tended to increase up to now,
reaching 1.3 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 1). Catches in the Atlantic peaked at
0.19 million tonnes in 1990 and then tended to decrease to 0.12 million tonnes in
2004 (Figure 5). Catches from the Indian Ocean increased to 0.49 million tonnes
in 2004 (Figure 4). Catches of yellowfin from the Pacific reached a peak at 0.86
million tonnes in 2002, decreasing to 0.70 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 3).
Bigeye, the third most important species in terms of landed weight (Figure 2)
is similar in appearance to yellowfin. However, unlike yellowfin, bigeye tunas are
primarily creatures of the deep, spending most of their lives in cold waters below
the upper mixed layer of the ocean where they used to be traditionally captured
mainly by longline gear. Their high fat content (for insulation from the cold water)
makes them desirable for the Japanese sashimi market. The rapid and substantial
increase in catches in the mid-1970s resulted from modifications of longline gear
which enabled it to be used in much deeper water than previously. However, more
recently the longline catches of large bigeye tunas have been declining, while purse
seine catches of smaller bigeye, particularly in association with FADs, increased
rapidly in the 1990s, resulting in continuous large increases of total catches for
the species to a maximum of 493 000 tonnes in 2000, declining slightly from that
level in subsequent years. The increases of bigeye purse seine catches around
FADs resulted in complications for fisheries management and allocations among
participants in the fisheries harvesting bigeye.
World production of albacore, used mostly for canning, increased from 1950
to the late 1960s. It has fluctuated without a clear trend since then with catches
of 220 000 tonnes in 2004 (Figure 2). During the 1980s and early 1990s, driftnet
fisheries made large catches of small albacore on the high seas in the southwestern
and northeastern Pacific. Even with the termination of these fisheries, the total
albacore catch in the Pacific significantly increased from the level before 2001,
peaking at 172 000 tonnes in 2002 (Figure 3).
Atlantic, Pacific and southern bluefin contribute relatively little in terms
of volume to the total catches of principal market tunas (Figure 2), but their
individual value is high because of their use for sashimi. The catch of these species
peaked at about 150 000 tonnes in 1961, following a steep decline in the late 1960s
as a result of decreased catches of southern bluefin.
Catches of Atlantic bluefin tended to decline from the early 1950s to the early
1970s. During the next decade and a half, catches fluctuated without trend. In the
early 1990s, reported catches increased rapidly to 53 000 tonnes in 1996 probably
as a result of improved reporting in the Mediterranean Sea. Catches declined
after 1996 and have stabilized at about 35 000 tonnes in the last period. The
catch reported in 2004 (34 500 tonnes) was slightly over the total allowable catch
(TAC) of 32 000 tonnes, but scientists at the International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) estimated it to be about 50 000 tonnes.
The catch of Pacific bluefin peaked at 32 000 tonnes in 1966 and 1981. The
smallest catch was 8 000 tonnes in the early 1990s. Catches have fluctuated
upwards since then, in the order of 29 000 tonnes in 2000, but decreasing to 22 000
tonnes in 2004.
Catches of southern bluefin increased steeply from 800 tonnes in 1952 to
81 000 tonnes in 1961. They fluctuated without a trend between 41 000 tonnes
and 66 000 tonnes until 1974. Catches of the species decreased steeply and steadily
from 45 000 tonnes in 1980 to 13 700 tonnes in 1991. The reported catches have
remained between 13 000 tonnes and 20 000 tonnes since then, with 13 500 tonnes
reported in 2004. Recently, a possibility of substantial under-reporting of southern
bluefin catches over the last ten to 20 years was identified.
Catches from individual
stocks of the principal market tunas are shown and discussed in the context of the
status of these stocks (see the Tuna and tuna-like species - Global factsheet).
 | Figure 3 Catches of principal market tunas in the Pacific (‘000 tonnes)  |
 | Figure 4 Catches of principal market tunas in the Indian Ocean ('000 tonnes)  |
 | Figure 5 Catches of principal market tunas in the Atlantic ('000 tonnes)  |
By oceanHistorically, the largest proportion of principal market tunas has always been
taken from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 6). Between 1998 and 2002, the annual catch
of these species in the ocean remained quite stable at about 2.5 million tonnes. This
represents approximately 65 percent of global annual catch of the principal market
tunas. Skipjack and yellowfin contribute about 86 percent of the total catch in the
Pacific.
Until the mid-1980s, catches of the principal market species in the Atlantic and
the Mediterranean Sea were greater than those in the Indian Ocean but around the
mid-1980s, the Atlantic catches became smaller than those in the Indian Ocean. The transfer of some vessels from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean contributed
to this change. Catches in the Atlantic continued to increase until 1994 when the
maximum annual catch of 0.63 million tonnes was taken, representing almost
18 percent of global landings of the principal market tunas. In 2004, Atlantic
landings were 428 000 tonnes. Bigeye, skipjack and yellowfin contribute about
70 percent of the total catches of principal market species there.
Prior to the 1980s, the catch from the Indian Ocean accounted for less than
about 8 percent of world production of the principal market tunas. As a result
of the expansion of tuna fishing operations in the ocean, catches of skipjack and
yellowfin increased rapidly in the 1980s. Consequently, catches of the principal
market tunas in the Indian Ocean surpassed those in the Atlantic Ocean,
accounting for about 26 percent of global landings of the principal market tunas in
2004 (i.e. around 1.1 million tonnes). At present, skipjack and yellowfin contribute
about 86 percent of the total catches of the principal market tunas from the Indian
Ocean.
 | Figure 6 Catches of principal market tunas by ocean (‘000 tonnes)  | By country/entityThe principal market tuna catches of Japan and Taiwan Province of China are now
the largest (more than 0.5 and 0.4 million tonnes caught in 2004, respectively) of
all countries (Figure 7). Other important tuna fishing countries include Indonesia
(341 948 tonnes), the Philippines (278 000 tonnes), Spain (268 585 tonnes),
Republic of Korea (231 320 tonnes), Papua New Guinea (206 678 tonnes), France
(165 767 tonnes), Ecuador (157 293 tonnes), Mexico (141 871 tonnes), Maldives
(135 919 tonnes), Islamic Republic of Iran (105 247 tonnes), United States of
America (99 917 tonnes), Seychelles (87 990 tonnes), Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela (81 432 tonnes), Sri Lanka (73 910 tonnes), Colombia (69 068 tonnes),
China (64 410 tonnes), Vanuatu (63 439 tonnes), Panama (59 291 tonnes) and
Ghana (55 681 tonnes). Particularly off Southeast Asia, in both the Indian and Pacific Oceans, tuna
fisheries are growing, including the artisanal sector catching mostly small tunas,
skipjack and yellowfin. This sector’s growth has also been significant in the
entire Indian Ocean. Further information on fishing countries/entities is given in
Table 1 - Catches of principal market tunas in 2004 by stock, fishing gear and country (tonnes) | Figure 7 Catches of principal market tunas by ocean (‘000 tonnes)  |
OTHER TUNA AND TUNA-LIKE SPECIES
The catches of tuna and tuna-like species other than the principal market tunas
also significantly increased from about 0.5 million tonnes in the early 1970s to
nearly 5.2 million tonnes in 2004, fluctuating significantly since the late 1980s.
Historical trends of catches of these species divided into billfishes, bonitos,
mackerels, seerfishes and small tunas (tunas other than the principal market tunas)
are presented in Figure 8. Less than 10 percent of these catches are composed of billfishes, taken
mainly in the Pacific and Atlantic. In terms of weight (catches in 2004), the most
important species of tunas and tuna-like species other than the principal market tunas are chub mackerel (2 017 276 tonnes), Atlantic mackerel (708 710 tonnes),
Indian mackerel not specified (498 124 tonnes), Japanese Spanish mackerel
(427 990 tonnes), frigate and bullet tunas (295 385 tonnes), Indian mackerel
(218 676 tonnes), narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (196 483 tonnes), longtail tuna
(143 329 tonnes), kawakawa (133 903 tonnes) and swordfish (109 622 tonnes).
 | Figure 8 Catches of billfishes, bonitos, mackerels, seerfishes and smll tunas (other than the principal market tunas) (‘000 tonnes)  |
Fishery Area Geo References for World Global Tuna Fisheries  | FAO Major Fishing Area | 21: Atlantic, Northwest | | 27: Atlantic, Northeast | | 31: Atlantic, Western Central | | 34: Atlantic, Eastern Central | | 37: Mediterranean and Black Sea | | 41: Atlantic, Southwest | | 47: Atlantic, Southeast | | 48: Atlantic, Antarctic | | 51: Indian Ocean, Western | | 57: Indian Ocean, Eastern | | 58: Indian Ocean, Antarctic | | 61: Pacific, Northwest | | 67: Pacific, Northeast | | 71: Pacific, Western Central | | 77: Pacific, Eastern Central | | 81: Pacific, Southwest | | 87: Pacific, Southeast |
More Geo References The following area codes have been found as intersecting the location of World Global Tuna Fisheries| FAO Major Fishing Area | 21:
Atlantic, Northwest | | 27:
Atlantic, Northeast | | 31:
Atlantic, Western Central | | 34:
Atlantic, Eastern Central | | 37:
Mediterranean and Black Sea | | 41:
Atlantic, Southwest | | 47:
Atlantic, Southeast | | 48:
Atlantic, Antarctic | | 51:
Indian Ocean, Western | | 57:
Indian Ocean, Eastern | | 58:
Indian Ocean, Antarctic | | 61:
Pacific, Northwest | | 67:
Pacific, Northeast | | 71:
Pacific, Western Central | | 77:
Pacific, Eastern Central | | 81:
Pacific, Southwest | | 87:
Pacific, Southeast | | (LME) Large Marine Ecosystem Areas | 1: Eastern Bering Sea | | 2: Gulf of Alaska | | 3: California Current | | 4: Gulf of California | | 5: Gulf of Mexico | | 6: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf | | 7: Northeast U.S. Continental Sh | | 8: Scotian Shelf | | 9: Newfoundland-Labrador Shelf | | 10: Insular Pacific-Hawaiien | | 11: Pacific Central American Coast | | 12: Caribbean Sea | | 13: Humboldt Current | | 14: Patagonian Shelf | | 15: South Brazil Shelf | | 16: East Brazil Shelf | | 17: North Brazil Shelf | | 18: West Greenland Shelf | | 19: East Greenland Shelf | | 20: Barents Sea | | 22: North Sea | | 23: Baltic Sea | | 24: Celtic-Biscay Shelf | | 25: Iberian Coastal | | 26: Mediterranean Sea | | 28: Guinea Current | | 29: Benguela Current | | 30: Agulhas Current | | 32: Arabian Sea | | 33: Red Sea | | 35: Gulf of Thailand | | 36: South China Sea | | 38: Indonesian Sea | | 39: North Australian Shelf | | 40: Northeast Australian Shelf/Great Barrier Reef | | 42: Southeast Australian Shelf | | 43: Southwest Australian Shelf | | 44: West-Central Australian Shelf | | 45: Northwest Australian Shelf | | 46: New Zealand Shelf | | 49: Kuroshio Current | | 50: Sea of Japan | | 52: Sea of Okhotsk | | 53: West Bering Sea | | 54: Chukchi Sea | | 59: East Greenland Shelf/Sea | | 60: Faroe Plateau | | 62: Black Sea | | 63: Hudson Bay | | 64: Arctic Ocean | | 65: Arctic Archipelago | | 66: Baffin Bay/Davis Straight |
Management
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION IN FISHERIES RESEARCH
REGIONAL FRAMEWORK
Countries/entities fishing tuna and tuna-like species cooperate in fisheries research
(including stock assessment) within several international frameworks (FAO, 1994;
Marashi, 1996; Beckett 1998). Jurisdictional framework With the exception of ISC and SPC, the below-mentioned institutions are the
Regional Fishery Management Organization (RFMO) and therefore, they also
have conservation and fisheries management responsibilities. All the tuna RFMOs, excepted CCSBT, deal with all the principal
market tuna species, billfishes and other tuna-like species in their specific areas of
competence. They also deal with the associated bycatch species to some extent. CCSBT is responsible for only one species of the principal market tunas in all areas of its distribution.
In addition to their responsibilities in conservation and fisheries management,
CCSBT, GFCM, IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC and WCPFC facilitate and/or coordinate
the data collection/collation, processing and dissemination, stock assessment
and other fisheries research in their areas of competence. IATTC, which has a
significant research capacity, carries out intensive research, while the roles of
CCSBT, GFCM, ICCAT, IOTC and WCPFC in research are mostly limited
to the coordination of activities of their member countries/entities. All these
organizations regularly carry out or facilitate stock assessments of tuna and tuna-like
species in their areas of competence, results of which are reviewed at various
scientific meetings (mostly of scientific committees and their working groups).
IATTC is the oldest tuna RFMO, while WCPFC is the youngest. Experiences
of those RFMOs created before the establishment of Article 64 of the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) were used in formulating
the Article, which mandates states to cooperate directly through appropriate
organizations to ensure the conservation of highly migratory species. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. A significant number of countries fishing for tuna in the Mediterranean Sea
(which is included in the area of competence of ICCAT) originally were not
members of ICCAT, but of GFCM only. Therefore, ICCAT collaborates closely
with GFCM regarding tuna and tuna-like species. The latter body endorses
and implements all the management measures introduced by ICCAT for the
Mediterranean Sea. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. GFCM is a fishery body of the Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations (FAO) which deals with all fish species including tuna and tuna-like species in the
Mediterranean Sea. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. IOTC is a fishery body of the Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations (FAO). Before the creation of IOTC, the FAO/United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Indo-Pacific Tuna Programme
(IPTP) coordinated and carried out tuna research in the Indian Ocean and in the
Pacific off Southeast Asia. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. CCSBT deals with only one target species (southern bluefin
tuna) on a global scale. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management. SPC, and more specifically its Oceanic Fisheries Programme (OFP), has a
significant research capacity in the stock assessment of tuna and tuna-like species.
It has been carrying out research required for the actual assessment of stocks of
the principal market tuna species and billfishes in the western and central Pacific.
Before the creation of the Scientific Committee (SC) of WCPFC in 2005, the
results of this research were reviewed at meetings of its Standing Committee on
Tuna and Billfish (SCTB). That function of SCTB has been replaced by that of the
SC of WCPFC, but SPC continues to carry out stock assessments of the principal
market tuna species and billfishes in the western and central Pacific. Mandate: Scientific Advice; Monitoring. ISC relies on the capacities of its member countries/entities in fisheries
research on North Pacific albacore, marlins and swordfish, Pacific bluefin and
the associated bycatch species. The collaboration between ISC and the Northern
Committee of WCPFC is being formally established. Mandate: Scientific Advice. GLOBAL COOPERATIONCooperation in tuna fisheries research extends beyond the scale of single oceans
for various reasons. As mentioned before, industrial tuna fleets are highly mobile
and capable of moving between oceans. The principal market tunas are intensively
traded on the global scale. In addition, many tuna fisheries research, conservation
and management problems are similar in all oceans. Therefore, there is a need for
exchange of information, cooperation and collaboration on the global scale.
Consequently, for a long time, representatives of the tuna RFMOs and SPC
have participated, as observers, in important technical meetings on tuna and tuna-like species outside their areas of competence. Since relatively recently,
usually once a year, representatives of secretariats of the tuna RFMOs, Pacific
Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) and SPC have organized short meetings
in conjunction with other prominent global fisheries meetings to discuss matters
of mutual interest. They have also created the Network of Tuna Agencies and
Programs. More recently, the tuna RFMOs have created a joint Web site (http://
www.tuna-org.org/) to share their information.
An important example of global collaboration including tuna and tuna-like
species is the formulation, in 1995, of the Agreement for the Implementation of
the Provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December
1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks
and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (sometimes referred to as the Fish Stocks
Agreement). The United Nations facilitated the conclusion of this Agreement and
FAO actively assisted, from a technical point of view, in reaching the Agreement
(Doulman, 1995; Mahon 1996).
FAO has been involved in the consideration of many other global issues
involving tuna and tuna-like species. One of these issues is bioeconomic
interactions among fisheries, which need to be scientifically addressed for
the resolution of fisheries management problems. Coordinated effort in this
direction was initiated by FAO’s Trust Fund project: “Cooperative Research on
Interactions of Pacific Tuna Fisheries” (Shomura, Majkowski and Langi, 1993a,
1993b; Shomura, Majkowski and Harman, 1995, 1996). With the completion of
the project, this effort is continued by regional and national institutions.
In March 2000, FAO coorganized, jointly with CCSBT, IATTC, ICCAT,
IOTC and SPC, a global Expert Consultation on Implications of the Precautionary
Approach for Tuna Biological and Technological Research in Thailand (FAO,
2001).
Another issue is that tuna fleets on the global scale have a greater capacity
to catch tuna than is required for their sustainable exploitation. For many tuna
fishing fleets, there is insufficient control of their capacity, fishing effort and
catches. All tuna RFMOs recognize the seriousness of the overcapacity problem.
As a result of such concerns (Joseph, 2003), FAO formulated and implemented
a technical, multidisciplinary Trust Fund project on the “Management of Tuna
Fishing Capacity: Conservation and Socio-economics”. Its objectives are to
provide necessary information and identify, consider and resolve technical
problems associated with the management of tuna fishing capacity on a global
scale, taking into account conservation and socio-economic issues. The Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) for the project is composed of experts affiliated with
CCSBT, FFA, IATTC, ICCAT, INFOFISH (http://www. infofish.org/), IOTC,
SPC, Japan’s National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (NRIFSF) and
international associations of tuna longliners and purse seiners (Organization for
the Promotion of Responsible Tuna Fisheries [OPRT] and the World Tuna Purse
Seine Organization [WTPO]). The project’s activities involved global studies,
meetings of the TAC (Rome, Italy, 14 to 16 April 2004 and Madrid, Spain, 15 to 18 March 2005) and the Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna
Fishing Capacity (La Jolla, California, United States of America, 8 to 12 May
2006).
Moreover, FAO collates data on nominal catches of all fish species including
tunas and, separately, specifically of principal market tunas (see the Sources of catch
data and other information in the Introduction). The first data set for all species is
based mainly on official national statistics; it does not distinguish among different
fishing gears and stocks. The second data set specifically for the principal tunas is
able to do this, since it is based mainly on statistics of international organizations
involved in tuna fisheries research (FAO, 2002). Both sets are handled through FAO’s Fisheries Global Information System (FIGIS) and can be accessed from
the Fisheries and Aquaculture Department website. FAO also
collates data on the geographic distribution of catches of tunas and billfishes on
a global scale. These data and information on tuna resources, fisheries and their
management are incorporated in FIGIS. Source of information Jacek Majkowski . Fishery Resources Officer.
“Global fishery resources of tuna and tuna-like species” .
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 483. Rome, FAO. 2007. 54p.
 . Bibliography The bibliographic references are available through the hyperlink displayed in "Source of Information". |
|
|