Français
World Global Tuna Fisheries, 2004
Fishery  Fact Sheet
World inventory of fisheries 2007
World Global Tuna Fisheries, 2004
Fact Sheet Citation  
Owned byFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO) more>>

Location of World Global Tuna Fisheries
 

Geographic reference: World
Spatial Scale: GlobalGlobal
Approach: Fishery Resource

Harvested Resource
Fishery Area: Atlantic, Northwest; Atlantic, Northeast; Atlantic, Western …; Atlantic, Eastern …;
more>>


Target Species: Albacore; Bigeye tuna; null …  
more>>

Fishery Indicators
Catch

History
 
Fisheries: Development and expansion

Tuna fisheries are among the oldest in the world with Phoenician trap fisheries (Ravier and Fromentin, 2001) for bluefin tuna occurring around 2000 BC. They are mentioned by Aristotle, Oppian and Pliny the Elder, and they are also recorded in excavations at prehistoric sites.

Until the second part of the twentieth century, fishing occurred mostly in coastal areas. In the Atlantic, it included purse seining for bluefin tuna off Norway; trolling for albacore in the Bay of Biscay; trap fishing near the Strait of Gibraltar and North African coast; swordfish fishing in the northwestern Atlantic and in the Mediterranean Sea; bigeye and skipjack fishing near islands; and artisanal fishing along the African coasts. In the Pacific, various artisanal fisheries operated near islands in tropical waters (albacore trolling off the West Coast of the United States of America, baitboat fishing for yellowfin and skipjack off the American coast, pole and line fishing for skipjack near Japan and many other fisheries for various tunas along the Japanese coasts). Off South America, coastal fisheries operated using baitboats and small seines. In the Indian Ocean, skipjack fishing off Sri Lanka, India and Maldives was carried out. Off Australia, longline fishing was carried out for southern bluefin tuna. Many other artisanal fisheries for tuna-like fishes existed in tropical or subtropical areas all over the world.

As a result of increasing demand for canned tuna, industrialized fisheries started during the 1940s and 1950s. They included Japanese longline and baitboat fishing in the Pacific and baitboat fishing off California along the Mexican coasts to Central America, while traditional fisheries continued their activities. After the Second World War, the fishing areas for the Japanese tuna fishery were limited to its coast until 1952. However, since then, fishing areas, particularly the longline ones, have expanded very rapidly. In the late 1950s, they reached as far as the Atlantic Ocean. Also in the late 1950s, some European pole and line fishing started off the African coasts from local harbours.

In the 1960s, Spanish and French boats with pole and line and purse seines started tuna fishing off West Africa. Japanese longliners also expanded their fishing area all over the world, mostly catching albacore and yellowfin for canning. In the middle of the 1960s, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China started large-scale longline fishing to export tuna for canning, learning the techniques from Japan. At the end of this decade, the Japanese longline industry developed an extremely cold storage system used for new frozen products for the sashimi market. Consequently, Japan switched the target species from yellowfin and albacore to bluefin and bigeye. The United States of America’s pole and line fishing off Central and South America was almost completely replaced by purse seiners in the 1960s and purse seining of tuna with dolphins was developed.

In the 1970s, the purse seine fisheries of European countries developed quickly in the east tropical Atlantic and attained the first peak of their catches of yellowfin and skipjack. Purse seine fisheries developed further in the eastern tropical Pacific. A strict regulation for the reduction of mortality of dolphins caught with tuna fishing was implemented in this area. Consequently, the United States of America’s flag vessels started changing their flags to other Central and South American countries. Some fishing effort was also shifted to the central and western Pacific where no dolphin fishing occurred.

After the development of extremely cold storage, some longliners gradually changed their target from yellowfin (for canning) to bigeye (for sashimi). This shift was first seen among Japanese longliners, but it gradually expanded to the fleets from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China. To catch bigeye, which has a much deeper habitat than that of tropical tunas, longlines were set deeper and deeper. This change in fishing strategy implies changes in fishing areas, leading to modifications in target and bycatch species.

In the 1980s, a new purse seine fishery started in the western Indian Ocean and many French seiners from the eastern Atlantic moved there. In the Pacific Ocean, the purse seine fishery expanded its fishing area, particularly in the south, central and western Pacific. Purse seine fishing efficiency increased with modern equipment such as bird radar and the use of helicopters. During the 1990s, many new countries entered into large-scale industrial fishing, mostly purse seining (e.g. Mexico, Venezuela and Brazil). Small-scale longline fishing operations by coastal countries in various areas (e.g. Mediterranean countries, the Philippines and Indonesia) also started. The Japanese longline fleet began to reduce its size in the 1980s. At the same time, Taiwan Province of China longliners and others flying flags of convenience increased rapidly.

Particularly in the 1980s, management regulatory measures for tuna fisheries were introduced by tuna fishery bodies, which also affected fishing patterns and country shares of catches. In the 1990s, more management measures were introduced, resulting in an increase in illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. IUU fishing became a hazard for the proper management of fish resources. In general, the tuna fishing capacity increased extensively during the 1990s. Recent increases in catches sometimes caused oversupply to the market, particularly for skipjack because of the large purse seine catches.

Starting in the 1980s and increasingly in the 1990s, many coastal states started new tuna fishing by chartering boats with flags of convenience. This occurred in all oceans. Some of these chartered vessels changed flags to the coastal states and this tendency will possibly be intensified in the near future. Partially because of the development of these new coastal fisheries, the fishing effort by traditional longline countries started to decline.

Purse seiners started fishing around FADs in the Atlantic in the early 1990s, and this method expanded to the Indian and Pacific Oceans. FAD fishing is less selective for fish species and size. The fishing efficiency, size of fish taken, species composition and incidental catch changed drastically with the adoption of this new practice..

Tuna farming started in the 1990s. This new industry resulted in a better price being paid to fishers and an increasing demand for specific sizes and species. Through the farming/fattening process, the relatively small tunas taken by purse seiners, which used to be sold only for canning, can now be used for the sashimi market. To date, bluefin tuna is the main species used in farming, but it is extending to bigeye and yellowfin tuna. The countries involved in bluefin farming include Australia, Japan, Mexico and several Mediterranean countries (particularly Croatia, Italy, Malta, Morocco, Spain and Turkey).

At present, on an industrial scale, tuna and tuna-like species are mainly caught with purse seines, longline and pole and line over wide areas in oceans (Figures 1 and 2). Of these fishing gears, the most catch in terms of weight is taken by purse seiners. In the Pacific, about 70 percent of the catch of principal market tunas is taken by purse seiners, 10 percent by pole and line and 8 percent by longlines. In the Indian Ocean, these values are 45, 15 and 20 percent and in the Atlantic, 55, 21 and 22 percent, respectively. Other gears used are troll lines, handlines, driftnets, traps and harpoons.

Industrial tuna fisheries are extremely dynamic and fleets, especially distantwater fishing fleets, can react very quickly to changes in stock size or market conditions. For example, as already mentioned, in the early 1980s, because of low catch rates and problems with access to fishing grounds, many French and Spanish purse seiners from the Atlantic moved to the Indian Ocean, contributing to the doubling of Indian Ocean catches. Some of these vessels have now moved back to the Atlantic. Similarly, because of unfavourable oceanographic conditions (El Niño), the United States of America’s purse seiners moved from the eastern Pacific to the western part of the ocean in the early 1980s.

The purse seine and pole and line are used to catch fish close to the surface (e.g. skipjack and relatively small individuals of yellowfin, albacore and bluefin). Longlines are used for fish at greater depths (e.g. large individuals of bluefin, bigeye, yellowfin, albacore and billfishes). Most purse seine and pole and line catches are canned. Longline catches with the exception of those of albacore are mainly sold on the sashimi market to be consumed raw, traditionally in Japan, but now also in other countries. The use of pole and line and large-scale longlining has been generally declining, while purse seining is increasingly used, resulting in greater catches of skipjack, small to medium yellowfin and small bigeye, while catches of large yellowfin and the other principal market tunas have remained relatively stable.

Small-scale longlining for high-quality fish for the sashimi market is increasingly being used by Taiwan Province of China and mainland China as well as other developing countries. This contributes to a general trend of rapidly increasing importance of coastal developing countries (including island countries of the Indian and Pacific Oceans) in tuna fishing. This increasing importance results from the purchase of purse seiners and from the intensification of artisanal fisheries. Catches from these fisheries may still be underestimated despite the fact that the rate of non-reporting of catches in developing countries is being reduced.

Further information on tuna fisheries can be found in Bayliff, Leiva Moreno and Majkowski (2005) and in Miyake, Miyabe and Nakano (2004). For each stock of principal market tunas, a list of the most important fishing countries can be found in Table 1 - Catches of principal market tunas in 2004 by stock, fishing gear and country (tonnes)
Harvested Resource
 
Catch
With the exception of the last part, this factsheet concentrates on principal market tunas (see the list of Target species). The relationship between catches of these species and those of all tuna and tuna-like species is presented in Figure 1. The latter catches tend to increase continuously with some fluctuations, reaching their maximum of about 9.5 million tonnes in 2003.


Figure 1 Annual catches of all tuna and tuna-like species, principal tunas, skipjack and yellowfin ('000 tonnes)
Figure 2 Annual catches of principal tunas other than skipjack and yellowfin ('000 tonnes)
History
PRINCIPAL MARKET TUNAS

Historical evolution
The global production of the principal market tunas increased relatively steadily from less than 0.2 million tonnes in the early 1950s to a peak of 4.3 million tonnes in 2003, declining slightly in 2004 (Figure 1). In the early 1950s, most catch (about 80 percent) was taken in the Pacific. Between 1970 and 1978, catches increased significantly as a result of the expansion of fisheries in the eastern Atlantic and the development of new offshore fishing grounds in the eastern Pacific. Between 1978 and 1984, many vessels moved to the western Pacific and the western Indian Ocean, developing new fisheries there. In the mid-1980s, catches of the principal tunas increased to 2.4 million tonnes. By 1994, they had increased to 3.4 million tonnes with better oceanographic conditions after the transfer of vessels. The development of FAD fishing also contributed to these increases.

By species
Skipjack, which is used mostly for canning, accounts for the greatest proportion of the world catches of tuna (Figure 1). Catches tended to increase over the entire period of its exploitation. In 2003, the skipjack catch was about 2.2 million tonnes (the highest on record), representing about half of all the principal market tuna landed. In the early 1980s, catches of skipjack increased steadily as a result of expansion of fishing effort into the tropical western and central Pacific (Figure 3) and the western Indian Ocean (Figure 4). These increases continued in the following years. The development of purse seine fisheries on FADs in the 1990s contributed to further increases in catches of tropical tuna species including skipjack. In the Atlantic, catches of skipjack peaked at 0.24 million tonnes in 1991, decreasing to 0.19 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 5) and thus contributing relatively little to the global catches of the species.

Yellowfin is commercially the second most important species of tuna by weight. Most yellowfin is used for canning, but more and more of the catches are being sold in fresh fish markets (and also as frozen fish). Similarly as with skipjack, for the same reasons, catches of yellowfin have tended to increase up to now, reaching 1.3 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 1). Catches in the Atlantic peaked at 0.19 million tonnes in 1990 and then tended to decrease to 0.12 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 5). Catches from the Indian Ocean increased to 0.49 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 4). Catches of yellowfin from the Pacific reached a peak at 0.86 million tonnes in 2002, decreasing to 0.70 million tonnes in 2004 (Figure 3).

Bigeye, the third most important species in terms of landed weight (Figure 2) is similar in appearance to yellowfin. However, unlike yellowfin, bigeye tunas are primarily creatures of the deep, spending most of their lives in cold waters below the upper mixed layer of the ocean where they used to be traditionally captured mainly by longline gear. Their high fat content (for insulation from the cold water) makes them desirable for the Japanese sashimi market. The rapid and substantial increase in catches in the mid-1970s resulted from modifications of longline gear which enabled it to be used in much deeper water than previously. However, more recently the longline catches of large bigeye tunas have been declining, while purse seine catches of smaller bigeye, particularly in association with FADs, increased rapidly in the 1990s, resulting in continuous large increases of total catches for the species to a maximum of 493 000 tonnes in 2000, declining slightly from that level in subsequent years. The increases of bigeye purse seine catches around FADs resulted in complications for fisheries management and allocations among participants in the fisheries harvesting bigeye.

World production of albacore, used mostly for canning, increased from 1950 to the late 1960s. It has fluctuated without a clear trend since then with catches of 220 000 tonnes in 2004 (Figure 2). During the 1980s and early 1990s, driftnet fisheries made large catches of small albacore on the high seas in the southwestern and northeastern Pacific. Even with the termination of these fisheries, the total albacore catch in the Pacific significantly increased from the level before 2001, peaking at 172 000 tonnes in 2002 (Figure 3).

Atlantic, Pacific and southern bluefin contribute relatively little in terms of volume to the total catches of principal market tunas (Figure 2), but their individual value is high because of their use for sashimi. The catch of these species peaked at about 150 000 tonnes in 1961, following a steep decline in the late 1960s as a result of decreased catches of southern bluefin.

Catches of Atlantic bluefin tended to decline from the early 1950s to the early 1970s. During the next decade and a half, catches fluctuated without trend. In the early 1990s, reported catches increased rapidly to 53 000 tonnes in 1996 probably as a result of improved reporting in the Mediterranean Sea. Catches declined after 1996 and have stabilized at about 35 000 tonnes in the last period. The catch reported in 2004 (34 500 tonnes) was slightly over the total allowable catch (TAC) of 32 000 tonnes, but scientists at the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) estimated it to be about 50 000 tonnes.

The catch of Pacific bluefin peaked at 32 000 tonnes in 1966 and 1981. The smallest catch was 8 000 tonnes in the early 1990s. Catches have fluctuated upwards since then, in the order of 29 000 tonnes in 2000, but decreasing to 22 000 tonnes in 2004.

Catches of southern bluefin increased steeply from 800 tonnes in 1952 to 81 000 tonnes in 1961. They fluctuated without a trend between 41 000 tonnes and 66 000 tonnes until 1974. Catches of the species decreased steeply and steadily from 45 000 tonnes in 1980 to 13 700 tonnes in 1991. The reported catches have remained between 13 000 tonnes and 20 000 tonnes since then, with 13 500 tonnes reported in 2004. Recently, a possibility of substantial under-reporting of southern bluefin catches over the last ten to 20 years was identified.

Catches from individual stocks of the principal market tunas are shown and discussed in the context of the status of these stocks (see the Tuna and tuna-like species - Global factsheet).


Figure 3 Catches of principal market tunas in the Pacific (‘000 tonnes)
Figure 4 Catches of principal market tunas in the Indian Ocean ('000 tonnes)
Figure 5 Catches of principal market tunas in the Atlantic ('000 tonnes)

By ocean
Historically, the largest proportion of principal market tunas has always been taken from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 6). Between 1998 and 2002, the annual catch of these species in the ocean remained quite stable at about 2.5 million tonnes. This represents approximately 65 percent of global annual catch of the principal market tunas. Skipjack and yellowfin contribute about 86 percent of the total catch in the Pacific.

Until the mid-1980s, catches of the principal market species in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea were greater than those in the Indian Ocean but around the mid-1980s, the Atlantic catches became smaller than those in the Indian Ocean. The transfer of some vessels from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean contributed to this change. Catches in the Atlantic continued to increase until 1994 when the maximum annual catch of 0.63 million tonnes was taken, representing almost 18 percent of global landings of the principal market tunas. In 2004, Atlantic landings were 428 000 tonnes. Bigeye, skipjack and yellowfin contribute about 70 percent of the total catches of principal market species there.

Prior to the 1980s, the catch from the Indian Ocean accounted for less than about 8 percent of world production of the principal market tunas. As a result of the expansion of tuna fishing operations in the ocean, catches of skipjack and yellowfin increased rapidly in the 1980s. Consequently, catches of the principal market tunas in the Indian Ocean surpassed those in the Atlantic Ocean, accounting for about 26 percent of global landings of the principal market tunas in 2004 (i.e. around 1.1 million tonnes). At present, skipjack and yellowfin contribute about 86 percent of the total catches of the principal market tunas from the Indian Ocean.


Figure 6 Catches of principal market tunas by ocean (‘000 tonnes)

By country/entity
The principal market tuna catches of Japan and Taiwan Province of China are now the largest (more than 0.5 and 0.4 million tonnes caught in 2004, respectively) of all countries (Figure 7). Other important tuna fishing countries include Indonesia (341 948 tonnes), the Philippines (278 000 tonnes), Spain (268 585 tonnes), Republic of Korea (231 320 tonnes), Papua New Guinea (206 678 tonnes), France (165 767 tonnes), Ecuador (157 293 tonnes), Mexico (141 871 tonnes), Maldives (135 919 tonnes), Islamic Republic of Iran (105 247 tonnes), United States of America (99 917 tonnes), Seychelles (87 990 tonnes), Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (81 432 tonnes), Sri Lanka (73 910 tonnes), Colombia (69 068 tonnes), China (64 410 tonnes), Vanuatu (63 439 tonnes), Panama (59 291 tonnes) and Ghana (55 681 tonnes).

Particularly off Southeast Asia, in both the Indian and Pacific Oceans, tuna fisheries are growing, including the artisanal sector catching mostly small tunas, skipjack and yellowfin. This sector’s growth has also been significant in the entire Indian Ocean. Further information on fishing countries/entities is given in Table 1 - Catches of principal market tunas in 2004 by stock, fishing gear and country (tonnes)
Figure 7 Catches of principal market tunas by ocean (‘000 tonnes)

OTHER TUNA AND TUNA-LIKE SPECIES

The catches of tuna and tuna-like species other than the principal market tunas also significantly increased from about 0.5 million tonnes in the early 1970s to nearly 5.2 million tonnes in 2004, fluctuating significantly since the late 1980s. Historical trends of catches of these species divided into billfishes, bonitos, mackerels, seerfishes and small tunas (tunas other than the principal market tunas) are presented in Figure 8.

Less than 10 percent of these catches are composed of billfishes, taken mainly in the Pacific and Atlantic. In terms of weight (catches in 2004), the most important species of tunas and tuna-like species other than the principal market tunas are chub mackerel (2 017 276 tonnes), Atlantic mackerel (708 710 tonnes), Indian mackerel not specified (498 124 tonnes), Japanese Spanish mackerel (427 990 tonnes), frigate and bullet tunas (295 385 tonnes), Indian mackerel (218 676 tonnes), narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (196 483 tonnes), longtail tuna (143 329 tonnes), kawakawa (133 903 tonnes) and swordfish (109 622 tonnes).


Figure 8 Catches of billfishes, bonitos, mackerels, seerfishes and smll tunas (other than the principal market tunas) (‘000 tonnes)
Fishery Area

Geo References for World Global Tuna Fisheries
Management
 
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION IN FISHERIES RESEARCH
REGIONAL FRAMEWORK
Countries/entities fishing tuna and tuna-like species cooperate in fisheries research (including stock assessment) within several international frameworks (FAO, 1994; Marashi, 1996; Beckett 1998).

Jurisdictional framework
With the exception of ISC and SPC, the below-mentioned institutions are the Regional Fishery Management Organization (RFMO) and therefore, they also have conservation and fisheries management responsibilities.

All the tuna RFMOs, excepted CCSBT, deal with all the principal market tuna species, billfishes and other tuna-like species in their specific areas of competence. They also deal with the associated bycatch species to some extent. CCSBT is responsible for only one species of the principal market tunas in all areas of its distribution.

In addition to their responsibilities in conservation and fisheries management, CCSBT, GFCM, IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC and WCPFC facilitate and/or coordinate the data collection/collation, processing and dissemination, stock assessment and other fisheries research in their areas of competence. IATTC, which has a significant research capacity, carries out intensive research, while the roles of CCSBT, GFCM, ICCAT, IOTC and WCPFC in research are mostly limited to the coordination of activities of their member countries/entities. All these organizations regularly carry out or facilitate stock assessments of tuna and tuna-like species in their areas of competence, results of which are reviewed at various scientific meetings (mostly of scientific committees and their working groups).



IATTC is the oldest tuna RFMO, while WCPFC is the youngest. Experiences of those RFMOs created before the establishment of Article 64 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) were used in formulating the Article, which mandates states to cooperate directly through appropriate organizations to ensure the conservation of highly migratory species.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  

A significant number of countries fishing for tuna in the Mediterranean Sea (which is included in the area of competence of ICCAT) originally were not members of ICCAT, but of GFCM only. Therefore, ICCAT collaborates closely with GFCM regarding tuna and tuna-like species. The latter body endorses and implements all the management measures introduced by ICCAT for the Mediterranean Sea.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  

GFCM is a fishery body of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) which deals with all fish species including tuna and tuna-like species in the Mediterranean Sea.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  
Management Body/Authority: Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)

IOTC is a fishery body of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Before the creation of IOTC, the FAO/United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Indo-Pacific Tuna Programme (IPTP) coordinated and carried out tuna research in the Indian Ocean and in the Pacific off Southeast Asia.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  

CCSBT deals with only one target species (southern bluefin tuna) on a global scale.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  
Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  


Mandate: Scientific Advice; Management.  



SPC, and more specifically its Oceanic Fisheries Programme (OFP), has a significant research capacity in the stock assessment of tuna and tuna-like species. It has been carrying out research required for the actual assessment of stocks of the principal market tuna species and billfishes in the western and central Pacific.

Before the creation of the Scientific Committee (SC) of WCPFC in 2005, the results of this research were reviewed at meetings of its Standing Committee on Tuna and Billfish (SCTB). That function of SCTB has been replaced by that of the SC of WCPFC, but SPC continues to carry out stock assessments of the principal market tuna species and billfishes in the western and central Pacific.

Mandate: Scientific Advice; Monitoring.  

ISC relies on the capacities of its member countries/entities in fisheries research on North Pacific albacore, marlins and swordfish, Pacific bluefin and the associated bycatch species. The collaboration between ISC and the Northern Committee of WCPFC is being formally established.

Mandate: Scientific Advice.  

GLOBAL COOPERATION
Cooperation in tuna fisheries research extends beyond the scale of single oceans for various reasons. As mentioned before, industrial tuna fleets are highly mobile and capable of moving between oceans. The principal market tunas are intensively traded on the global scale. In addition, many tuna fisheries research, conservation and management problems are similar in all oceans. Therefore, there is a need for exchange of information, cooperation and collaboration on the global scale.

Consequently, for a long time, representatives of the tuna RFMOs and SPC have participated, as observers, in important technical meetings on tuna and tuna-like species outside their areas of competence. Since relatively recently, usually once a year, representatives of secretariats of the tuna RFMOs, Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) and SPC have organized short meetings in conjunction with other prominent global fisheries meetings to discuss matters of mutual interest. They have also created the Network of Tuna Agencies and Programs. More recently, the tuna RFMOs have created a joint Web site (http:// www.tuna-org.org/) to share their information.

An important example of global collaboration including tuna and tuna-like species is the formulation, in 1995, of the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (sometimes referred to as the Fish Stocks Agreement). The United Nations facilitated the conclusion of this Agreement and FAO actively assisted, from a technical point of view, in reaching the Agreement (Doulman, 1995; Mahon 1996).

FAO has been involved in the consideration of many other global issues involving tuna and tuna-like species. One of these issues is bioeconomic interactions among fisheries, which need to be scientifically addressed for the resolution of fisheries management problems. Coordinated effort in this direction was initiated by FAO’s Trust Fund project: “Cooperative Research on Interactions of Pacific Tuna Fisheries” (Shomura, Majkowski and Langi, 1993a, 1993b; Shomura, Majkowski and Harman, 1995, 1996). With the completion of the project, this effort is continued by regional and national institutions.

In March 2000, FAO coorganized, jointly with CCSBT, IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC and SPC, a global Expert Consultation on Implications of the Precautionary Approach for Tuna Biological and Technological Research in Thailand (FAO, 2001).

Another issue is that tuna fleets on the global scale have a greater capacity to catch tuna than is required for their sustainable exploitation. For many tuna fishing fleets, there is insufficient control of their capacity, fishing effort and catches. All tuna RFMOs recognize the seriousness of the overcapacity problem. As a result of such concerns (Joseph, 2003), FAO formulated and implemented a technical, multidisciplinary Trust Fund project on the “Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity: Conservation and Socio-economics”. Its objectives are to provide necessary information and identify, consider and resolve technical problems associated with the management of tuna fishing capacity on a global scale, taking into account conservation and socio-economic issues. The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the project is composed of experts affiliated with CCSBT, FFA, IATTC, ICCAT, INFOFISH (http://www. infofish.org/), IOTC, SPC, Japan’s National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (NRIFSF) and international associations of tuna longliners and purse seiners (Organization for the Promotion of Responsible Tuna Fisheries [OPRT] and the World Tuna Purse Seine Organization [WTPO]). The project’s activities involved global studies, meetings of the TAC (Rome, Italy, 14 to 16 April 2004 and Madrid, Spain, 15 to 18 March 2005) and the Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity (La Jolla, California, United States of America, 8 to 12 May 2006).

Moreover, FAO collates data on nominal catches of all fish species including tunas and, separately, specifically of principal market tunas (see the Sources of catch data and other information in the Introduction). The first data set for all species is based mainly on official national statistics; it does not distinguish among different fishing gears and stocks. The second data set specifically for the principal tunas is able to do this, since it is based mainly on statistics of international organizations involved in tuna fisheries research (FAO, 2002). Both sets are handled through FAO’s Fisheries Global Information System (FIGIS) and can be accessed from the Fisheries and Aquaculture Department website. FAO also collates data on the geographic distribution of catches of tunas and billfishes on a global scale. These data and information on tuna resources, fisheries and their management are incorporated in FIGIS.
Source of information
 
Jacek Majkowski . Fishery Resources Officer. “Global fishery resources of tuna and tuna-like species” . FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 483. Rome, FAO. 2007. 54p. Click to open.
Bibliography
 
The bibliographic references are available through the hyperlink displayed in "Source of Information".
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2012
crawl