Fisheries and Resources Monitoring System

EspañolFrançais
Dentex - São Tomé e Príncipe
Fact Sheet Title  Fact Sheet
CECAF Scientific advice 2016
Dentex - São Tomé e Príncipe
Fact Sheet Citation  
Dorade (Dentex spp) - Sao Tomé-et-Principe
Owned byFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO) – ownership
ident Blockident Blockdisplay tree map
 
Species List:
Species Ref: en - Dentex nei, fr - Dentés nca, es - Dentones y samas nep, ru - Зубаны

Fishery Indicators
Production: Catch
ident Block Dentex - São Tomé e Príncipe
Aq Res
Biological Stock: Yes         Value: National
Management unit: Yes        Reference year: 2010
 
 
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State TrendUncertain/Not assessed
Habitat Bio
Climatic Zone: Tropical.   Depth Zone: Shelf - Deepshelf (100 m - 200 m).   Vertical Dist: Demersal.  

Geo Dist
Geo Dist: National

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: National

Water Area Overview
Aq Res Struct
Biological Stock: Yes


Dentex spp. is not important in the catches in Nigeria and Cameroon. Therefore the Working Group considered only the stock in Sao Tome & Principe.
Exploit
 
Fishery Indicators
TypeMeasureValueUnitTime period
ProductionCatch 148tonnes2001
Catch 153tonnes2002
Catch 160tonnes2003
Catch 166tonnes2004
Catch 168tonnes2005
Catch 173tonnes2006
Catch 178tonnes2007
Catch 183tonnes2008
Catch 188tonnes2009
Bio Assess
 

Assessment year: 2011
The CECAF Working Groups have adopted the following Biological Reference Points (BRPs):
- Limit Reference points: BMSY and FMSY
- Target Reference Points: B0.1 and F0.1
Stock status is assigned based on current estimates of fishing mortality (Fcur) and biomass (Bcur) relative to these target and limit reference points (Bcur/BMSY, Fcur/FMSY, Bcur/B0.1, Fcur/F0.1). The results from the stock assessment of this stock are found under the “Biological state and trend section”.
Assess Models
Type:  Biomass-aggregated
Schaefer dynamic production model

The Working Group used the total catches of Dentex spp. for Sao Tome & Principe from 2001 to 2010 and CPUE (artisanal – number of fishermen) for the same number of years.
Results

The model was attempted but rejected because the CPUE used was not in the appropriate format and did not provide a satisfactory fit.
Sci Advice

The Working Group was not in a position to recommend any specific management measure. Nevertheless, it recommends proceeding with an indepth analysis of the data before the next Working Group meeting.
Management
Management unit: Yes
Sources
 
FAO. 2016. Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Report of the seventh session of the Scientific Sub-Committee, Tenerife, Spain, 14–16 October 2015 / Comité des pêches pour l’Atlantique Centre-Est Rapport de la septième session du Sous-Comité scientifique. Tenerife, Espagne 14-16 octobre 2015. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report / FAO Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture No. 1128. Rome, Italy.  Click to openhttp://www.fao.org/3/I5301Bi/i5301bi.pdf
FAO. 2015. Report of the FAO/CECAF Working Group on the Assessment of Demersal Resources – Subgroup South. Accra, Ghana, 15–24 November 2011 / Rapport du Groupe de travail FAO/COPACE sur l’évaluation des ressources démersales – Sous-groupe Sud. Accra, Ghana, 15-24 novembre 2011. CECAF/ECAF Series/COPACE/PACE Séries. No. 15/76. Rome, Italy/Italie.  Click to openhttp://www.fao.org/3/a-i5138b.pdf
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2024
Powered by FIGIS
crawl