Fisheries and Resources Monitoring System

EspañolFrançais
Vermillion snapper - Gulf of Mexico USA waters
Fact Sheet Title  Fact Sheet
Status of stocks and resources 2019
Vermillion snapper - Gulf of Mexico USA waters
Fact Sheet Citation  
Owned byFood and Agriculture Organization (FAO) – ownership
ident Blockident Blockdisplay tree map
 
Species List:
Species Ref: en - Vermilion snapper, fr - Vivaneau ti-yeux, es - Pargo cunaro
ident Block Vermillion snapper - Gulf of Mexico USA waters
Aq Res
Biological Stock: Yes         Value: National
Management unit: Yes        Reference year: 2014
 
 
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State Trend Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State TrendF(2014) = 0.08Not applicable
Aq Res State TrendSSB2014/SSB0 = 32%Not applicable
Aq Res State Trend
Aq Res State TrendMaximally sustainably fished

The most recent assessment in USA waters of the Gulf of Mexico indicated that the stock was not overfished nor undergoing overfishing (SEDAR, 2016c). 
Habitat Bio
Climatic Zone: Tropical.   Vertical Dist: Demersal.  

Water Area Overview
Spatial Scale: National

Water Area Overview
Aq Res Struct
Biological Stock: Yes
Exploit
 

The primary commercial gear used for Gulf of Mexico vermilion snapper is vertical hook and line (vertical lines, bandit rigs, rod and reel, etc…). Vermilion snapper are occasionally captured on long line gear and in the trap fishery. In most years, the take from the trap and long line fisheries were a small fraction of the total landings. The data collected from these fisheries included landings, discards, catch-per-unit effort, and age composition. Commercial data were tabulated by broad geographical region loosely separated by the Mississippi River and was updated for SEDAR 45 through 2014 for both regions. In general, the 2011 Update assessment recreational landings estimates are quite close to the SEDAR 45 values (Figure 6). Minor discrepancies existed from1981-1985 (due to historical calibration ratio changes) and 2004-2012 (due to APAIS calibration adjustments). Recreational landings peaked in the 1990s before declining to relatively low levels through the 2000s. Landings have increased again over the last few years to average levels from the 1990s. The recreational catch is dominated by landings from the eastern region and recent increases are almost solely due to landings in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (Figure 6). Catch in the west is dominated by the headboat sector, but in the east charter and headboats account for approximately equivalent catches and show similar trends (Table 6). Landings from the recreational fleet date back to 1981. Landings prior to when data were available was linearly interpolated to virgin conditions (no catch) in 1950 and fit as true landings in the model. 
Bio Assess
Uncertainty: Intermediate

Data

Data up to 2014. Landings of Vermillion snapper from the US Gulf of Mexico represent approximately 27% of total Vermillion snapper landings in FAO Area 31. Landings recorded by the US NMFS in 2015 and 2016 were lower than in 2014.
Assess Models
Type:  Age-structured
Stock Synthesis

For the purposes of the SEDAR 45 vermilion snapper assessment the Stock Synthesis 3 (SS3) software package was utilized (v3.24Y; Methot and Wetzel, 2013). Stock Synthesis is an integrated statistical catch-at-age (SCAA) model, which projects forward from initial conditions using age-structured population dynamics equations. SCAA models are comprised of three modeling modules: the population dynamics module, an observation module, and a likelihood function. For vermilion snapper a model of moderate complexity was implemented. A single area model was implemented where recruits are assumed to homogenously settle across the entire Gulf of Mexico. Although a two area model (eastern and western Gulf of Mexico) may be appropriate for this stock given differences in age structure and fishing behavior across the Gulf, lack of sufficient sampling in the western stock area precluded such a formulation (see Section 2.3.3.2 on recreational age composition data).
Results

Fishing Mortality - Total harvest rate (total numbers killed divided by total exploitable numbers, age-1+) for the entire stock and fishing mortality by fleet (continuous rates) are provided in Figure 15 and Table 17. As the stock became exploited in the early 1960s and moved away from virgin conditions, the harvest rate remained at relatively low levels and slowly climbed until the 1980s when all three fisheries and the shrimp bycatch fleet became simultaneously active. Exploitation continued to climb until the mid-1990s when harvest rate peaked around 20%. Since that time, exploitation rate has seen a relatively steady decline to a 2014 value (.08) that is equivalent to values in the early 1980s when the recreational fleet first became active. Much of the decline is attributed to a precipitous drop in shrimp bycatch fishing mortality, which was the dominant source of removals for the entire timeseries up until the mid-2000s. Since that time, the commercial east fleet has been the dominant component with the commercial west fleet exhibiting similar, but typically lower fishing mortality. The recreational fleet is often the smallest component of fishing mortality, but has seen a sharp increase since 2010 and was actually the dominant component in the terminal year. All of the directed fleets have shown a generally increasing trend in fishing mortality since the 1980s. However, the commercial west fleet then showed a declining trend from the mid-2000s to the terminal year. The commercial east fishery showed two large peaks (timeseries highs) in 2009 and 2011, but has been declining from 2012-2014. Terminal year fishing mortality rates for the commercial east, commercial west, recreational, and shrimp bycatch fleets were 0.05, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.06, respectively. - Biomass and Abundance Trajectories - Spawning stock biomass (number of eggs) and total biomass (metric tons) have followed similar trends over the entire timeseries (Figures 22 and 23; Table 18). Steady declines occurred as the stock moved away from virgin conditions and was lightly exploited by the commercial fisheries up until the early 1980s, but simultaneously experience comparatively high shrimp bycatch mortality. In the early 1980s the recreational fleet began to exploit the resource and commercial mortality concomitantly increased causing a rapid decline in biomass until the late 1990s. Timeseries lows were reached in the late 1990s corresponding to the maximum bycatch mortality rates. With the reduction in shrimp effort and bycatch mortality in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the stock rebounded slightly and has seen a gradually increasing trend over the last two decades. Despite the decline in shrimp mortality being partially replaced by higher directed fishing mortality (compared to levels seen in the 1980s), the terminal biomass (10,952mt) is estimated to be at its highest point since 1995 and the same is true for terminal SSB (2.06E+14 eggs). Depletion levels (SSB/SSB0) reached a low point of 26% in 1999 and 2000 and fluctuated around 30% for all of the 2000s. In the last few years depletion has decreased and in 2014 was at 31%, the highest level since 1996. Similarly, total abundance has shown similar trends as biomass and SSB, but is slightly more volatile because of its sensitivity to recruitment values (Figure 23; Table 18). From timeseries lows in the late 1990s, abundance has shown a stronger increasing trend than biomass and reached its highest level since 1994 in 2013 and 2014 (terminal year estimate of 45 million fish). Abundance trends are characterized by periodic troughs due to below average recruitment events, but age structure has been steadily rebuilding since the late 1990s due to strong cohorts over the last decade and a half (Figure 23). Average age in the stock at virgin conditions was between 3 and 4 years of age. Average age is now around age-2. - Discussion - The model generally fit each of the data sources well with limited residual patterns, but did not tightly fit annual values for each of the indices. However, the trends among observed and predicted indices were in general agreement. Landings and age composition showed acceptable fits with no strong residual patterns. Length composition data from the video and groundfish survey were not as well fit as the age composition data, but this is not unexpected when fitting length data within an age structure model, particularly with a fast growing fish like vermilion snapper. There was some strong parameter correlation, particularly in domed selectivity parameters and between steepness and the stock-recruit variance (σR) term, which may be the cause of slight model instability. However, the bootstrap and jitter analysis indicated that these correlations were not causing excessive model instability as most runs converged to the same solution space. No retrospective trends were present indicating internal consistency within the model. In general, the model appears to be performing well with no convergence issues or any major instability. This is not to say it is the best possible model or the most accurate, but, given the available data and the results of a suite of diagnostic analyses, no pathological faults have been found. - Stock Status - Using SPR 30% as the basis for defining MSST and MFMT, stock status appears to be healthy. In 2014, the stock was around 73% of MFMT, 140% of MSST, and 105% of SSBSPR30% with an SSB2014/SSB0 of 32% (Tables 21 and 22). The Kobe plot (Figure 51) indicates that over the course of its history, overfishing occurred on vermilion snapper from 1986-2006, but this mostly corresponded to fishing down from equilibrium conditions (e.g., towards SPR 30%). Over the last decade, overfishing has generally not occurred except in a few years. On the other hand, vermilion has never been overfished. After the intense fishing pressure of the late 1980s and early 1990s, SSB did decline below that at SPR 30%, but never went below the MSST. With the recent decline in fishing mortality and the increase in SSB, vermilion snapper is currently not overfished and overfishing is not occurring.
Sci Advice

• Improve sample sizes in the recreational fisheries, particularly for age composition data, so that the recreational fleet can be modeled by mode and/or region. • Investigate a two region model that may be better able to account for differences in age structure and recruitment across the Gulf of Mexico. • Continue to evaluate discards by fleet and incorporate them if they become significant portions of total catch. • Evaluate discard mortality. • Evaluate the protocol for estimating shrimp bycatch and update the WinBugs program with any changes to data collection protocols that may have occurred over the last decade. • Obtain age or length compositions from the shrimp bycatch fisheries to better inform shrimp selectivity estimates. • Perform simulation validation of IFQ standardization techniques.

Management
Management unit: Yes
Sources
 
FAO. Western Central Atlantic Fishery Commission. 2019. Review of the state of fisheries and fisheries resources in the WECAFC region. Meeting document WECAFC/SAG/IX/2018/3 of the ninth session of the Scientific Advisory Group, Christ Church, Barbados, 19-20 November 2018.  Click to openhttp://www.fao.org/fi/static-media/MeetingDocuments/WECAFC/SAG2018/3e.pdf
SEDAR. 2016c. SEDAR 45 – Stock Assessment Report. Gulf of Mexico Vermillion Snapper. SEDAR, North Charleston SC. 188 pp.  Click to openhttps://sedarweb.org/docs/sar/S45_Final_SAR.pdf
Bibliography
 
FAO. Western Central Atlantic Fishery Commission/FAO Commission des pêches pour l’Atlantique Centre-Ouest/FAO Comisión Central de Pesca para el Atlántico CentroOccidental. 2019. Report of the ninth session of the Scientific Advisory Group, Christ Church, Barbados, 19-20 November 2018. Rapport de la neuvième session du Groupe scientifique consultatif, Christ Church, Barbade, 19-20 Novembre 2018. Informe de la octava sesión del Grupo Asesor Científico, Christ Church, Barbados, 19-20 de Noviembre de 2018. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report/Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture/Informe de Pesca y Acuicultura. No. 1266. Bridgetown, 156 pp.  Click to openhttp://www.fao.org/3/ca4776t/ca4776t.pdf
All references to figures, tables and bibliography in the text are found within the source of information.
powered by FIGIS  © FAO, 2024
Powered by FIGIS
crawl